Study of 2 Modalities of Dialysis and Nutrition on the Nutritional Status of Malnourished Chronic Renal Disease Patients

Study of Two Modalities of Dialysis and Nutrition on the Nutritional Status of Malnourished Chronic End-stage Renal Disease Patients Dependent on Intradialytic Parenteral Nutrition

Describe the impact of dialysis by high permeability and adsorbent membrane (PEPA®) associated with oral nutritional supplementation on the nutritional status of malnourished chronic end-stage renal disease patients dependent on intradialytic parenteral nutrition.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study proposes to compare the nutritional state after 6 months of dialysis with standard membrane associated with intradialytic parenteral nutrition (retrospective phase) with the nutritional state after 6 months of dialysis with high permeability membrane associated with oral nutritional supplementation (prospective phase).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

11

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lille, France
        • Hôpital Privé La Louvière

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with renal failure, on hemodialysis for at least 12 months;
  • Hemodialysis patient in 3 weekly sessions on a device with a standard permeability membrane (polysulfone, polyethersulfone or polyartylethersulfone type);
  • Malnourished patient, on intradialytic parenteral nutrition for at least 6 months;
  • Patient who may benefit, according to the doctor, from a change in dialysis and nutrition strategy:
  • Patient who signed an informed consent form to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known allergy to PEPA® ;
  • Protected patient (under legal protection, or deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision);
  • Patient with a chronic infection in progress;
  • Patient with life expectancy <6 months according to the investigator;
  • Inability to understand information related to the study (linguistic, psychological, cognitive reason, etc.);
  • Pregnant woman or likely to be (of childbearing age, without effective contraception) or breastfeeding;
  • Patient participating in another clinical trial, or in a period of exclusion from another clinical trial;
  • Patient not benefiting from a social security scheme.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: SEQUENTIAL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Membrane PEPA®
Patient will use the membrane PEPA® for the dialysis
Adjunction of oral nutritional supplementation
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Standard membrane of dialysis
Patient will use a standard membrane for the dialysis
Adjunction of intradialytic parenteral nutrition

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evolution of the nutritional status
Time Frame: Month 6
The main endpoint is the evolution between M0 and M6 of the nutritional status measured by the serum albumin level.
Month 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evolution of nutritional assessment
Time Frame: Month 6
Evolution of the percentage of weight loss (in Kg)
Month 6
Appearance of adverse events
Time Frame: Month 6
Incidence and characteristics of adverse events / effects
Month 6
Measure of the Quality of life
Time Frame: Month 6
Evolution of the quality of life, evaluated by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire of the quality of life with 28 questions with 4 possible answers from "not at all" to "a lot of"
Month 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

July 21, 2020

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 4, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 4, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 19, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 22, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

June 24, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 5, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2020-A01267-32

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Renal Insufficiency

Clinical Trials on oral nutritional supplementation

3
Subscribe