Reducing In-Hospital and 60-Day Mortality in ICU Patients After Surgery With Strict Nutritional Supplementation

September 25, 2023 updated by: Eun Young Kim, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital

Reducing In-Hospital and 60-Day Mortality in Critically Ill Patients After Surgery With Strict Nutritional Supplementation: A Prospective, Single-Labeled, Randomized Controlled Trial

Malnutrition in critically ill patients is a global concern due to its association with increased infectious complications, prolonged hospital stays, and higher morbidity rates. Patients who undergo abdominal surgery are particularly vulnerable due to alterations in gastrointestinal function and prolonged fasting. Despite the significance of proper nutrition, guidelines remain broad, and practical implementation is often inadequate.

The investigators aimed to assess the effects of strict nutritional provision, targeting an energy adequacy of 80% or more and a protein intake of at least 1.5 g/kg/day, on in-hospital and 60-day mortality.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

During the acute phase of critical illness, patients experience metabolic and physiological changes that affects their nutrition status. One prominent feature is the activation of stress hormones and inflammatory mediators, which contribute to a negative nitrogen balance, increased gluconeogenesis, and accelerated muscle proteolysis. Among these patients, those who undergo abdominal surgery are particularly vulnerable to malnutrition as they experience alterations in the structural barrier of the gastrointestinal tract, impaired nutrient absorption, and prolonged fasting due to concerns such as the integrity of an anastomosis. Thus, appropriate nutritional therapy should be prioritized for critically ill patients following abdominal surgery, and it should include adequate nutritional support to preserve lean body mass and organ function.

Despite the importance of nutritional supply, the recommendations for protein or calorie intake vary according to different guidelines, and this is the same for surgical patients. Additionally, some patients experience a delay in initiating nutritional support, and several studies reported that only 39 - 63% of the intended energy and 45 - 55% of the prescribed protein are being administered to critically ill patients during the acute phase. Furthermore, recent randomized controlled trials reported conflicting results with current guidelines, with some suggesting that lower calorie or higher protein dose administrations did not significantly impact clinical outcomes and may even worsen the outcomes for certain patient groups. Thus, the optimal nutritional provision target during the acute phase of critical illness, particularly for surgical patients, remains controversial, and there is no standardized protocol.

In our previous study, the malnutrition status upon admission, indicated by a modified Nutrition Risk in the Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) score of 5 or higher, and low energy adequacy during intensive care unit (ICU) stay were identified as mortality predictors in critically ill patients following abdominal surgery. The investigators aimed to assess the effects of strict nutritional provision, targeting an energy adequacy of 80% or more and a protein intake of at least 1.5 g/kg/day, on in-hospital and 60-day mortality. Additionally, the investigators investigated the appropriate target for nutrition support in critically ill patients who undergo abdominal surgery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

368

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Seocho-gu, Banpo-dong Banpodaero 222
      • Seoul, Seocho-gu, Banpo-dong Banpodaero 222, Korea, Republic of, 137-701
        • Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients admitted after abdominal surgery to our institution's surgical ICU
  • They were enrolled regardless of the surgical method, either open, laparoscopy, or robotic.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • aged under 18 years
  • underwent surgery under local or regional anesthesia
  • pregnant
  • readmitted to the ICU
  • diagnosed with renal failure and receiving renal replacement therapy
  • lacked individual data necessary to calculate the mNUTRIC score measured at ICU admission
  • failed to provide informed consent, or with 'do-not-resuscitate' status.
  • the patient was discharged or expired within 48 hours of ICU admission
  • patients diagnosed with multiorgan failure, represented by a high Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (≥9) upon ICU admission

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active nutritional supplementation
The participants in active nutritional supplementation arm received nutritional support targeting specific protein (over 1.5 g/kg/day) and calorie intake (over 20 kcal/kg/day), with consultation from the nutritional support team and the initiation of nutritional supplementation on the same day as intensive care unit admission.

The participants in active nutritional supplementation arm received consultation from the nutritional support team (NST) upon ICU admission, and nutritional supplementation was initiated on the same day.

NST is a multidisciplinary support team comprised of physicians, nurses, dietitians, and pharmacists, which assesses the nutritional status of patients, and provides recommendations for nutritional therapy. Targets in the participants in active nutritional supplementation arm were protein supplementation at over 1.5 g/kg/day, calorie provision at over 20 kcal/kg/day, and energy adequacy of at least 80%. Energy target was estimated by multiplying the resting energy expenditure using the Harris and Benedict equation by an activity factor of 1.3 and a stress factor of 1.1. Actual body weight was used as the body weight for patients with a percent of ideal body weight (PIBW) of less than 120%, while adjusted body weight was used for patients with a PIBW greater than or equal to 120%.

Experimental: Conventional nutritional supplementation
The participants in conventional nutritional supplementation arm underwent conventional nutrition management without specific protein or caloric targets.
The participants in conventional nutritional supplementation arm received conservative nutritional management without specific protein or caloric targets.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
60-day mortality rate
Time Frame: Participants were followed upto 60th day after surgery
Proportion of patients who died within 60 days after surgery among participants
Participants were followed upto 60th day after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
In-hospital mortality rate
Time Frame: Participants were followed upto 60th day after surgery
Proportion of patients who died during the hospitalization period
Participants were followed upto 60th day after surgery
Incidence of postoperative complications
Time Frame: Participants were followed upto 60th day after surgery
Proportion of patients who died within 60 days after surgery among participants
Participants were followed upto 60th day after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Hye sung Kim, The Catholic University of Korea

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 5, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 25, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 28, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 28, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 25, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NUMIS_02

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Protein-Energy Malnutrition

Clinical Trials on Active nutritional supplementation

3
Subscribe