Efficacy Analysis in Long Term of Radiofrecuency Combined vs. T.E. in the Treatment of Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome.

Analysis of the Efficacy in the Lomg Term (Six Months Follow up) of the Combination of Radiofrecuency and Therapeutic Exercise Versus Therapeutic Exercise Alone in the Treatment of Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome.

The present study aims to promote research in the field of Physiotherapy, focusing on a health problem of maximum relevance, such as patellofemoral pain syndrome.

Although these treatments seem to be based on theoretical reasoning, the evidence for the efficacy of these interventions is not well established. Therefore, we select from among all the therapeutic tools available in physiotherapy, a procedure of therapeutic physical exercise.

Main objectives:

To know the efficacy of a therapeutic physical exercise protocol in the reduction of pain and the improvement of functional disability in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS).

Secondary objectives:

• Quantify the reduction of pain in the anterior aspect of the knee in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS), after treatment with monopolar capacitive diathermy by radiofrequency.
• To evaluate the improvement of functional disability in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS), after treatment with monopolar capacitive diathermy by radiofrequency.

Study hypothesis:

The treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) with a therapeutic physical exercise protocol produces statistically significant changes in the reduction of pain and functional disability and the normalization of the anthropometric values of the joint balance of the knee

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: Therapeutic Exercise; Other: Radiofrecuency

Detailed Description

At first, a meeting will be held with the patients under study where they will be informed and any doubts that may arise in relation to the investigation will be resolved. In addition, the correct adaptation of these to the inclusion and exclusion criteria of our study will be verified. Subsequently, they will be given individually the informed consent prepared expressly for the present study, the doubts arising with respect to this one will be resolved and their signature will proceed. At this time, and individually again, we will proceed to the development of the Clinical History of Physiotherapy where only the information necessary for our study will be collected.

To emphasize in this point that the participants will grant their consent for the treatment of the data obtained for scientific purposes, according to the legal norms.

Next, the patients will be randomly assigned to two groups: control group and experimental group. The randomization of the sample was done through the EPIDAR software in version 3.1 between the Experimental Group and the Control Group Subsequently, the evaluations and measurements of the study variables will be carried out by the research team.

CONTROL GROUP: You will be provided exclusively therapeutic exercises protocol to develop supervised by Physical Therapist that you must perform following a daily activity for three weeks. They will be evaluated at the end of that period and six moths later in order to have at least three timepoints to evaluate.

EXPERIMENTAL GROUP: After the initial evaluation, the first 10 treatment sessions will be developed at the rate of five daily sessions in the first week, three sessions on alternate days in the second week and two sessions on alternate days in the third week (3 weeks in total), applying the monopolar capacitive diathermy with radiofrequency in the anterior aspect of the knee, in dynamic application in one of the members: affect or randomized (uni or bilateral pathology, respectively). This diathermy will be combined with a therapeutic exercise program supervised by a Physiotherapist.

The treatment is administered with a Diathermy equipment and inductive electrodes of 100 W peak power, with a frequency of application of twice daily with a dose submitis (grade I), for 10 min, with a frequency of repetition of the impulses of 46 Hz and a pulse duration of 0.2 ms

After the tenth treatment session all the measurements will be repeated following the same environmental conditions as at the beginning and by the evaluators themselves to the components of both groups.Those measurements will be evaluated at the end of that three weeks period and six moths later in order to have at least three timepoints to evaluate.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 86
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Spain
  • Sevilla, Spain, 41008
    • Cristo Jesús Barrios Quinta

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Citeria:

1. Age from 18 to 55
2. . Patients with anterior knee pain were referred by a primary care physician at a public health center in southern Spain. Those participants with a self-reported pain intensity = 30 mm on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and a score <45 points in personal psychology The Apprehension Scale (PPAS) were invited to participate. The PPAS is a valid, reliable and easy-to-use tool for assessing the apprehension of subjects to receive electrical stimulation therapy.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Any contraindication for the use of MDR.
2. Present cognitive alterations.
3. Have undergone conservative or surgical treatment of the knee in less than 6 months.
4. Having received injections of corticosteroids or hyaluronic acid; impaired cognition or communication; and be involved in an ongoing medical-legal dispute.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: CONTROL GROUP: You will be provided exclusively therapeutic exercises protocol to develop in the home setting that you must perform following a daily activity for three weeks.	Other: Therapeutic Exercise; CONTROL GROUP: will be provided exclusively therapeutic exercises protocol to develop in the home setting that you must perform following a daily activity for three weeks. They will be evaluated at the end of that period and six moths later in order to have at least three timepoints to evaluate.
Experimental: EXPERIMENTAL GROUP; After the initial evaluation, the first 10 treatment sessions will be developed at the rate of five daily sessions in the first week, three sessions on alternate days in the second week and two sessions on alternate days in the third week (3 weeks in total), applying the monopolar capacitive diathermy with radiofrequency in the anterior aspect of the knee, in dynamic application in one of the members: affect or randomized (uni or bilateral pathology, respectively). This diathermy will be combined with a therapeutic exercise program supervised by a Physiotherapist. The treatment is administered with a pulsatile short-wave equipment and inductive electrodes of 100 W peak power, with a frequency of application of twice daily with a dose submitis (grade I), for 10 min, with a frequency of repetition of the impulses of 46 Hz and a pulse duration of 0.2 ms.	Other: Radiofrecuency; EXPERIMENTAL GROUP: After the initial evaluation, the first 10 treatment sessions will be developed at the rate of five daily sessions in the first week, three sessions on alternate days in the second week and two sessions on alternate days in the third week (3 weeks in total), applying the monopolar capacitive diathermy with radiofrequency in the anterior aspect of the knee, in dynamic application in one of the members: affect or randomized (uni or bilateral pathology, respectively). This diathermy will be combined with a therapeutic exercise program supervised by a Physiotherapist.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
The perception of pain through the Visual Analogue Scale (EVA).	The perception of pain through the Visual Analogue Scale (EVA). This variable has been obtained through a validated scale of 10 centimeters (0-10), where the subject self-positioned from absence of pain to the worst bearable pain.	Time point 1: before the intervention
The perception of pain through the Visual Analogue Scale (EVA).	The perception of pain through the Visual Analogue Scale (EVA). This variable has been obtained through a validated scale of 10 centimeters (0-10), where the subject self-positioned from absence of pain to the worst bearable pain.	Time point 2: when the intervention was finished (after 10 sesions : 2 weeks)
The perception of pain through the Visual Analogue Scale (EVA).	The perception of pain through the Visual Analogue Scale (EVA). This variable has been obtained through a validated scale of 10 centimeters (0-10), where the subject self-positioned from absence of pain to the worst bearable pain.	Time point 3: six months later the initial evaluation.
Kujala Score.	The functional disability, quantified by means of the tests: Kujala Score.	Time point 1: before the intervention
Kujala Score.	The functional disability, quantified by means of the tests: Kujala Score.	Time point 2: when the intervention was finished (after 10 sesions : 2 weeks)
Kujala Score.	The functional disability, quantified by means of the tests: Kujala Score.	Time point 3: six months later the initial evaluation.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Active and Pasive Knee's Range of Movement	In addition an anthropometric study of knee joint range of movement will be performed. Evaluating the Active and Pasive Knee's Range of Movement using universal goniometer measurement. we pay special attention to the possible restrictions in the normal range of motion	Time point 1: before the intervention.
Active and Pasive Knee's Range of Movement	In addition an anthropometric study of knee joint range of movement will be performed. Evaluating the Active and Pasive Knee's Range of Movement using universal goniometer measurement. we pay special attention to the possible restrictions in the normal range of motion	Time point 2: when the intervention was finished (after 10 sesions : 2 weeks)
Active and Pasive Knee's Range of Movement	In addition an anthropometric study of knee joint range of movement will be performed. Evaluating the Active and Pasive Knee's Range of Movement using universal goniometer measurement. we pay special attention to the possible restrictions in the normal range of motion	Time point 3: six months later the initial evaluation.

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: University of Seville

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): October 1, 2019
• Primary Completion (Actual): March 30, 2020
• Study Completion (Actual): March 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: June 26, 2020
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: July 5, 2020
• First Posted (Actual): July 8, 2020

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): August 17, 2020
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: August 13, 2020
• Last Verified: August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Knee Pain; Physiotherapy; Musculoskeletal; Physical Medicine / Rehabilitation
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Mental Disorders; Pathologic Processes; Disease; Joint Diseases; Musculoskeletal Diseases; Syndrome; Somatoform Disorders; Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome
• Other Study ID Numbers: RvsTE6MFU

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No