A Peer-mediated Vocational Social Skills Program for Young Adults With Autism

A Peer-mediated Vocational Social Skills Program for Adolescents & Young Adults With Autism

The Assistive Social Skills and Employment Training program (ASSET) is an occupationally-based, work-related social skills intervention, designed to address the pre-employment and mental health needs of young adults with high-functioning autism in school-to-work transition. Knowing that occupational therapy (OT) services designed to address the post-secondary transition needs of this population have been largely unexplored, and recognizing the need for OT students to gain practical experience facilitating psychosocial groups, this study seeks to: (1) evaluate program impacts on participants' psychosocial functioning and work readiness, and (2) pilot the use of OT students as group facilitators. The study will follow a mixed-methods, single group design, using questionnaires and interviews to assess skills, confidence, and psychological wellness before intervention, immediately after, and at follow-up. OT students will also be interviewed and complete pre- and post-intervention assessments of clinical self-efficacy and stress. This project supports the AOTF's objectives by: (1) building OT academic program capacity to partner with university services and the autism community to improve transition outcomes in an underserved group, (2) laying the groundwork for larger, more rigorous studies of ASSET's effectiveness, and (3) gathering pilot data to support future grant applications at the federal level.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Autism Spectrum Disorder High-Functioning
• Intervention / Treatment: Behavioral: Assistive Soft Skills & Employment Training (ASSET)

Detailed Description

There are two specific aims of this study. First, researchers will test the effects of the ASSET Program on: (a) improving social function, work-related social skills, and self-efficacy (primary outcomes), and (b) psychological wellness (secondary outcome) using a quasi-experimental, single group, time series design. Secondly and concurrently, researchers will collect pilot data on the "near peer" mediation aspects of the intervention from the perspectives of OT students and ASSET group participants. Specifically, researchers will measure occupational therapy student facilitators' perceived stress, clinical self-efficacy, and educational value of the experience; and collect data on ASSET participants' ratings of the quality of the facilitation as delivered by occupational therapy graduate students.

Design: Using a quasi-experimental, repeated time series design, this convergent parallel mixed-methods pilot study will use quantitative data to measure change in primary and secondary outcomes, while qualitative data (session feedback forms, pre/post/follow-up interviews) will be collected in order to compare or relate themes to the quantitative findings. Building from the results of our earlier work using professional facilitators, the following two aims will be examined. Psychometric properties of instruments are available in the Appendices.

AIM 1: Evaluate the effects of the ASSET program on the social function, work-related social skills knowledge, confidence (primary outcomes) and psychological wellness (secondary outcomes) of a group of college students with HFASD immediately after the 13-week intervention delivered by graduate students and at 3-month follow-up.

Research Questions and Hypotheses:

Q1: Is ASSET associated with improvements in work-related social skills knowledge, social function, and social self-efficacy when facilitated by OTS? H1: Immediately post intervention, on average, ASSET participants will show statistically significant improvements in primary outcomes (work-related social skills knowledge, social function, and social self-efficacy).

H2: At three-month follow-up, on average, ASSET participants will show declines in primary outcomes, yet scores will remain above baseline and at statistically significant levels.

H3: Immediately post intervention, on average, ASSET participants will show clinically significant improvements in secondary mental health outcomes (anxiety and depression); however, these gains may not reach the level of statistical significance.

H4: At three-month follow-up, on average, ASSET participants will show continued improvements in secondary mental health outcomes (anxiety and depression), with improvements in anxiety reaching a level of statistical significance when compared to baseline.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 15
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Florida
    • Fort Myers, Florida, United States, 33965
      • Florida Gulf Coast University

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years to 29 years (Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• 18-29 years of age
• previous diagnosis of autistic disorders, Asperger's disorder, Pervasive Developmental Disorder

Exclusion Criteria:

• no current participation in other work related social skills treatment
• no history of other neurological disorders
• no history of major mental illness (e.g., schizophrenia)

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: N/A
• Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

1

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Intervention / Treatment

Experimental: ASSET Intervention; 13-session group intervention

Behavioral: Assistive Soft Skills & Employment Training (ASSET); The ASSET curriculum covers six key social skill areas: (a) Communication; (b) Networking; (c) Attitude & Enthusiasm; (d) Teamwork; (e) Problem Solving & Critical Thinking; and (f) Professionalism, as well as new content added based on our pilot findings (Mental Health; Stress Management and Self-Advocacy; and Awareness of Self & Others). The schedule includes two sessions for Communication and Professionalism, and a graduation session; thus, bringing the total number of sessions to 13. The structural elements of the training format include didactic lecture, experiential activities, group discussions, role-plays, performance feedback,and weekly take-home assignments. A key element is a social hour following each 90-minute session, in which participants practice learned skills while sharing a meal.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Baseline Social Functioning	Social Responsiveness System-2 (Constantino & Gruber, 2012), 65-item rating scale measuring social functioning categorized into five subscales: Social Awareness, Social Cognition, Social Communication, Social Motivation and Restricted Interests, and Repetitive Behavior. Each item is scored on a 4-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 1 (not true) to 4 (almost always true). A score decrease indicates improved functioning.	immediately pre-intervention
Change in Social Functioning	Social Responsiveness System-2 (Constantino & Gruber, 2012), 65-item rating scale measuring social functioning categorized into five subscales: Social Awareness, Social Cognition, Social Communication, Social Motivation and Restricted Interests, and Repetitive Behavior. Each item is scored on a 4-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 1 (not true) to 4 (almost always true). A score decrease indicates improved functioning.	immediately post intervention
Change in Social Functioning	Social Responsiveness System-2 (Constantino & Gruber, 2012), 65-item rating scale measuring social functioning categorized into five subscales: Social Awareness, Social Cognition, Social Communication, Social Motivation and Restricted Interests, and Repetitive Behavior. Each item is scored on a 4-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 1 (not true) to 4 (almost always true). A score decrease indicates improved functioning.	85-95 days post intervention
Baseline General Self-efficacy	The General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE; Schwarzer and Jerusalem 1995) is a ten-item, four point Likert-type scale, ranging from 1 (not true at all) to 5 (exactly true), which measures perceived ability to cope with challenges. Higher scores indicate higher functioning.	immediately pre-intervention
Change in General Self-efficacy	The General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE; Schwarzer and Jerusalem 1995) is a ten-item, four point Likert-type scale, ranging from 1 (not true at all) to 5 (exactly true), which measures perceived ability to cope with challenges. Higher scores indicate higher functioning.	immediately post intervention
Change in General Self-efficacy	The General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE; Schwarzer and Jerusalem 1995) is a ten-item, four point Likert-type scale, ranging from 1 (not true at all) to 5 (exactly true), which measures perceived ability to cope with challenges. Higher scores indicate higher functioning.	85-95 days post intervention
Baseline Perceived Empathic Self-efficacy	The Perceived Empathic Self-Efficacy Scale (PESE; Caprara and Steca 2005) is a six-item self-report inventory, which measures participants' perceived ability to exercise theory of mind. The PESE uses a five-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 1 (not well at all) to 5 (very well). Higher scores indicate higher functioning.	immediately pre-intervention
Change in Perceived Empathic Self-efficacy	The Perceived Empathic Self-Efficacy Scale (PESE; Caprara and Steca 2005) is a six-item self-report inventory, which measures participants' perceived ability to exercise theory of mind. The PESE uses a five-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 1 (not well at all) to 5 (very well). Higher scores indicate higher functioning.	immediately post intervention
Change in Perceived Empathic Self-efficacy	The Perceived Empathic Self-Efficacy Scale (PESE; Caprara and Steca 2005) is a six-item self-report inventory, which measures participants' perceived ability to exercise theory of mind. The PESE uses a five-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 1 (not well at all) to 5 (very well). Higher scores indicate higher functioning.	85-95 days post intervention
Baseline Perceived Social Self-efficacy	The Perceived Social Self-Efficacy Scale (PSSE; Caprara and Steca 2005) is a five-item inventory used to measure participants' self-perceived ability to express opinions, share personal experiences, work cooperatively, and manage interpersonal conflict. Respondents rate each item on a five-point scale from 1 (not well at all) to 5 (very well). Higher scores indicate higher functioning.	immediately pre-intervention
Change in Perceived Social Self-efficacy	The Perceived Social Self-Efficacy Scale (PSSE; Caprara and Steca 2005) is a five-item inventory used to measure participants' self-perceived ability to express opinions, share personal experiences, work cooperatively, and manage interpersonal conflict. Respondents rate each item on a five-point scale from 1 (not well at all) to 5 (very well). Higher scores indicate higher functioning.	immediately post intervention
Change in Perceived Social Self-efficacy	The Perceived Social Self-Efficacy Scale (PSSE; Caprara and Steca 2005) is a five-item inventory used to measure participants' self-perceived ability to express opinions, share personal experiences, work cooperatively, and manage interpersonal conflict. Respondents rate each item on a five-point scale from 1 (not well at all) to 5 (very well). Higher scores indicate higher functioning.	85-95 days post intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Baseline Depression	The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9; Spitzer et al. 2000) is a nine-item self-report inventory used to assess depressive symptoms. The PHQ-9 uses a four-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day) with total scores ranging from 0 to 27. Sample items include: "Little interest or pleasure in doing things," and "Feeling down, depressed, or hopeless." Lower scores indicate less symptoms.	immediately pre-intervention
Change in Depression	The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9; Spitzer et al. 2000) is a nine-item self-report inventory used to assess depressive symptoms. The PHQ-9 uses a four-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day) with total scores ranging from 0 to 27. Sample items include: "Little interest or pleasure in doing things," and "Feeling down, depressed, or hopeless." Lower scores indicate less symptoms.	immediately post-intervention
Change in Depression	The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9; Spitzer et al. 2000) is a nine-item self-report inventory used to assess depressive symptoms. The PHQ-9 uses a four-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day) with total scores ranging from 0 to 27. Sample items include: "Little interest or pleasure in doing things," and "Feeling down, depressed, or hopeless." Lower scores indicate less symptoms.	85-95 days post-intervention
Baseline Anxiety	The General Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire-7 (GAD-7; Spitzer et al., 2006) is a seven-item self-report measure used to measure anxiety. The GAD-7 uses a four-point Likert-type scale to assess frequency of symptoms, ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day) with total scores range from 0 to 21. Sample items include: "Feeling nervous, anxious or on edge," and "Worrying too much about different things." Lower scores indicate less symptoms.	immediately pre-intervention
Changes in Anxiety	The General Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire-7 (GAD-7; Spitzer et al., 2006) is a seven-item self-report measure used to measure anxiety. The GAD-7 uses a four-point Likert-type scale to assess frequency of symptoms, ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day) with total scores range from 0 to 21. Sample items include: "Feeling nervous, anxious or on edge," and "Worrying too much about different things." Lower scores indicate less symptoms.	immediately post-intervention
Changes in Anxiety	The General Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire-7 (GAD-7; Spitzer et al., 2006) is a seven-item self-report measure used to measure anxiety. The GAD-7 uses a four-point Likert-type scale to assess frequency of symptoms, ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day) with total scores range from 0 to 21. Sample items include: "Feeling nervous, anxious or on edge," and "Worrying too much about different things." Lower scores indicate less symptoms.	85-95 days post-intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Florida Gulf Coast University
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Annemarie Connor, PhD, Assistant Professor

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.
• Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.
• Caprara GV, Steca P, Gerbino M, Pacielloi M, Vecchio GM. Looking for adolescents' well-being: self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of positive thinking and happiness. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. 2006 Jan-Mar;15(1):30-43. doi: 10.1017/s1121189x00002013.
• Aldridge FJ, Gibbs VM, Schmidhofer K, Williams M. Investigating the clinical usefulness of the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) in a tertiary level, autism spectrum disorder specific assessment clinic. J Autism Dev Disord. 2012 Feb;42(2):294-300. doi: 10.1007/s10803-011-1242-9.
• Connor A, Sung C, Strain A, Zeng S, Fabrizi S. Building Skills, Confidence, and Wellness: Psychosocial Effects of Soft Skills Training for Young Adults with Autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 2020 Jun;50(6):2064-2076. doi: 10.1007/s10803-019-03962-w.
• Sung C, Connor A, Chen J, Lin CC, Kuo HJ, Chun J. Development, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of an employment-related social skills intervention for young adults with high-functioning autism. Autism. 2019 Aug;23(6):1542-1553. doi: 10.1177/1362361318801345. Epub 2018 Dec 22.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): September 16, 2019
• Primary Completion (Actual): April 15, 2020
• Study Completion (Actual): June 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: May 14, 2020
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: July 8, 2020
• First Posted (Actual): July 13, 2020

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): February 3, 2021
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: February 2, 2021
• Last Verified: February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: social skills; Mental health; employment; vocational rehabilitation
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Mental Disorders; Neurodevelopmental Disorders; Child Development Disorders, Pervasive; Autistic Disorder; Autism Spectrum Disorder
• Other Study ID Numbers: 2018-11

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: No

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No