Erectus Nerve Block for Lumbar Spine Surgery (EFABE)

Erectus Nerve Block for Lumbar Spine Surgery : a Prospective Randomized Study

: Spine surgery induced severe postoperative pain. Several techniques as intravenous multimodal analgesia have been proposed to reduce pain relief and morphine rescue over the first postoperative days. Regional anesthesia using the erectus nerve block is a simple infiltration across lamina of the vertebra: Ultrasound-guided posterior ramus of spinal nerve block for anesthesia and analgesia in lumbar spinal surgery This study compared erector nerve block with local anesthetic vs placebo to reduce pain and morphine rescue after lumbar spine surgery. The investigators hypothesized that eructor nerve block induced a large block from L1 to L5 that induced posterior nerve roots block anesthesia. This block reduced pain after surgery.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Gard
      • Nîmes, Gard, France, 30 000
        • CHU Nîmes

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age> 18years and <80 years
  • lumbar spine surgery (2-4 levels)
  • posterior approach
  • ASA 1-3

Exclusion Criteria:

  • refusal
  • age < 18yrs
  • <50 kg and >120 kg
  • pregnant
  • renal or hepatic severe desease
  • ASA 4
  • no French speaking
  • emergency surgery
  • local or systemic infection
  • surgical resumption of the surgical site
  • surgery involving a thoracic approach
  • allergy to local anesthetics

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treated
active treatment (Local anaesthetic): Local administration of ropivacaine 30 mL (5mg/mL)
Erector nerve block with local ropivacaine injection in addition with conventional anesthesia for spine surgery
Placebo Comparator: Control
Local administration of Placebo ( Saline Solution)
injection of saline solution in addition with conventional anesthesia for spine surgery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
morphine consumption (mg)
Time Frame: 24 Hours after surgery
Quantity administered in the post-interventional monitoring room and in hospitalization via a self-controlled morphine pump by the patient
24 Hours after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse events
Time Frame: from surgery to 3 months
Nausea, vomiting, confusion, urinary retention, hematoma, reintervention
from surgery to 3 months
pain at rest and at movement: Visual Analogic scale
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 3, Day od hospital discharge and month 3
Visual Analogic scale of pain (0-10)
Day 1 to Day 3, Day od hospital discharge and month 3
chronic pain: DN4 questionnaire
Time Frame: Questionnaire DN4 at 3 months
pain score as mesured with DN4 questionnaire
Questionnaire DN4 at 3 months
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: hospital length of stay, an average of 4 days
Number of day in hospital
hospital length of stay, an average of 4 days
Length of stay in the post-intervention care unit
Time Frame: Day 1
Number of minutes that patient stay in post intervention care unit in minutes
Day 1
Patient Satisfaction: visual analogic scale
Time Frame: Day of hospital discharge, an average of day 4
Patient satisfaction mesured with a visual analogic scale (0-10)
Day of hospital discharge, an average of day 4
Patient Quality of life: EQ-5D Questionnaire
Time Frame: 3 months
Patient Quality of life mesured with EQ-5D Questionnaire
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Geoffrey Avis, Md, Geoffrey.avis@chu-nimes.fr

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 27, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 25, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

September 9, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 27, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 15, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

July 16, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 16, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 15, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spine Surgery

Clinical Trials on Local administration of ropivacaine

3
Subscribe