Ultrasound-guided Intermediate Cervical Block Versus Superficial Cervical Block for Carotid Endarterectomy (CERVECHO) (CERVECHO)

Ultrasound-guided Intermediate Cervical Block Versus Superficial Cervical Block for Carotid : a Randomised Controlled Trial

The aim of this prospective, randomised, controlled study is to compare the efficacy of ultrasound-guided intermediate cervical block to superficial block for carotid endarterectomy.

Patients scheduled for carotide endarterectomy under regional anaesthesia (ropivacaine 4.75 mg/ml) are randomised into 2 groups according to the technique of anaesthesia performed: superficial cervical block (Control group) or, ultrasound guided intermediate cervical block (Echo group). Main outcome is cervical block success, defined by surgery performed under regional anaesthesia without supplemental topical lidocaine. Secondary outcomes are rate of conversion to general anaesthesia, total dose of supplemental topical lidocaine and block-related complications.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

86

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Besançon, France, 25000
        • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patient scheduled for elective carotid artery endarterectomy under regional anaesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • indication for general anaesthesia
  • known bleedind diathesis
  • past medical allergy to local anaesthesic
  • severe chronic pulmonary disease
  • contralateral diaphragmatic motion abnormalities
  • previous cervical ipsilateral surgery
  • age < 18 years

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: control group
landmark-based superficial cervical block is used. After insertion of the needle superficially below the skin, 20 to 30 ml of 4.75 mg/ml ropivacaine are injected fan-like in the subcutaneus plane.
Experimental: echo group
ultrasound-guided intermediate cervical block was performed. The probe is placed perpendicular to the skin, in the horizontal plane at the C3-C4 level. Needle is inserted in-plane. 10 ml ropivacaine 4.75mg/ml are injected under ultrasound control, 5 ml injected when needle is withdrawn under ultrasound control, 5 ml in the subcutaneous plane.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
cervical block success
Time Frame: surgery time
carotid artery endarterectomy performed under regional anaesthesia without supplemental topical lidocaine.
surgery time

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
percentage of conversion to general anaesthesia
Time Frame: surgery time
conversion to general anaesthesia for insufficient analgesia
surgery time

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
percentage of patient needing intraoperative systemic analgesia or sedation
Time Frame: anaesthesia time
if patient related pain in spite of supplemental local anaesthesic. sedation/analgesia let to the discretion of the anesthesist in the operating room
anaesthesia time
amount of local anaesthesic used to performed the block
Time Frame: surgery time
surgery time
regional anaesthesia-related complications
Time Frame: 7 postoperative days
Horner syndrom, facial paralysis, cough, phrenic paralysis
7 postoperative days
surgery related complications
Time Frame: 7 postoperative days
hematoma, stroke, bleeding
7 postoperative days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pascal Petit, MD, CHRU Besançon
  • Principal Investigator: Sebastien Pili-Floury, MD PhD, CHRU Besançon

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 3, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

December 6, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 6, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2012

Last Verified

December 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carotid Atherosclerosis

Clinical Trials on landmark based superfical ropivacaine 4.75 mg/ml injection

3
Subscribe