Long Term Function Outcomes and Pain in Implant-based Post-mastectomy Breast Reconstruction

The Impact of Operative Approach on Long Term Function Outcomes and Pain in Implant-based Post-mastectomy Breast Reconstruction

The objective of this proposal is to broadly assess patient physical functioning following breast reconstruction.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

600

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Recruiting
        • Washington University School of Medicine
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Julie Margenthaler, M.D.
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Terence Myckatyn, M.D.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Janessa Sullivan
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Danielle Cooper, M.D.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Grace Keane
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Marissa Tenenbaum, M.D.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants who undergone breast reconstruction surgery with plastic surgery faculty at the Washington University School of Medicine Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female
  • At least 18 years of age
  • Had a mastectomy for breast cancer or cancer prevention any time between 01/01/2010 and 06/30/2021.
  • Has undergone breast reconstruction surgery with plastic surgery faculty at the Washington University School of Medicine Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.
  • Able to understand and willing to sign an IRB-approved written informed consent document.

Exclusion Criteria:

-Known distant metastatic disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Participants with prepectoral reconstruction
-Participants will complete the post-mastectomy breast reconstruction physical well-being survey
-The survey will ascertain: function status (BREAST Q - Physical Well Being Module and PROMIS upper extremity function), former interaction with physical or occupational therapy, amount of narcotics taken weekly due to chest/neck/breast pain, amount of Tylenol or similar anti-inflammatories taken weekly due to chest/neck/breast pain, and amount of muscle relaxants taken weekly due to chest/neck/breast pain.
Participants with postpectoral reconstruction
-Participants will complete the post-mastectomy breast reconstruction physical well-being survey
-The survey will ascertain: function status (BREAST Q - Physical Well Being Module and PROMIS upper extremity function), former interaction with physical or occupational therapy, amount of narcotics taken weekly due to chest/neck/breast pain, amount of Tylenol or similar anti-inflammatories taken weekly due to chest/neck/breast pain, and amount of muscle relaxants taken weekly due to chest/neck/breast pain.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compare the physical well-being Q-score derived from the BREAST-Q between the two groups
Time Frame: Completion of study (estimated to be 30 months)
The physical well-being module is one of the domains of the BREAST-Q that can be administered in isolation. Patients answer specific questions with answers that range from 1-4 to 1-5. Upon completion of this component of the survey, a physical well-being-specific numerical score is generated. This is then converted, based on previously published Rasch-modeling to generate a Q-score whose values range from 0-100. This same approach is used for all other domains of the BREAST-Q. Pre- versus postoperative Q-scores for physical well-being can be directly compared to study the impact of surgery on physical well-being. Similarly, the physical-well-being domain can be readministered to provide a longitudinal assessment of physical function over time.
Completion of study (estimated to be 30 months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Satisfaction with outcome
Time Frame: Completion of study (estimated to be 30 months)
-The satisfaction with outcome module is one of the domains of the BREAST-Q. Patients answer specific questions with answers that range from 1-3. Upon completion of this component of the survey, a specific numerical score is generated. This is then converted, based on previously published Rasch-modeling to generate a Q-score whose values range from 0-100.
Completion of study (estimated to be 30 months)
Satisfaction with breasts
Time Frame: Completion of study (estimated to be 30 months)
-The satisfaction with breast module is one of the domains of the BREAST-Q. Patients answer specific questions with answers that range from 1-4. Upon completion of this component of the survey, a specific numerical score is generated. This is then converted, based on previously published Rasch-modeling to generate a Q-score whose values range from 0-100.
Completion of study (estimated to be 30 months)
Upper extremity function as measured by PROMIS Upper Extremity Short Form 7a
Time Frame: Completion of study (estimated to be 30 months)
-Questions regarding upper extremity function as reported by patient. Answers range from 5=without any difficulty to 1=unable to do. The total score ranges from 5-35.
Completion of study (estimated to be 30 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Terence Myckatyn, M.D., Washington University School of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 7, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 14, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

July 20, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

March 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 202006199

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post-mastectomy Breast Reconstruction

Clinical Trials on Post-mastectomy breast reconstruction physical well-being survey

3
Subscribe