Whole-Body Vibration Training and Pilates Exercises for Healthy Women

Comparison of the Effects of Whole-Body Vibration Training and Pilates Exercises on Physical Fitness, Fatigue and Physical Self Perception in Healthy Women

This study aimed to compare the effects of whole-body vibration (WBV) training and Pilates exercises on physical fitness, fatigue, and physical self-perception in healthy women. This study was carried out on 36 healthy sedentary female subjects. Subjects were divided into three groups; Pilates training group, WBV training group, and control group. In the Pilates group, the exercises were performed with "Reformer®" for eight weeks, twice in a week, 45-min per day. In the WBV group, the training was given "Power Plate®" for eight weeks, twice in a week, and 30 minutes in a day. The control group did not receive any training.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Fatigue; Body Weight; Healthy Lifestyle
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: Pilates exercises; Other: Whole body vibration

Detailed Description

This study aimed to compare the effects of whole-body vibration (WBV) training and Pilates exercises on physical fitness, fatigue, and physical self-perception in healthy women aged between 25-45 years. The study was conducted between August 2018-January 2019 in a health and physiotherapy clinic. This study was carried out on 36 healthy sedantary female subjects.

Before starting the study, the subjects were divided into three groups in a randomized manner using "Random Online Allocation Software" (www.Graphpad.com)

1. Group 1: Pilates training group
2. Group 2: WBV training group
3. Group 3: Control group

Pilates training group: The exercises were performed with "Reformer®" for eight weeks, twice in a week, 45-min per day. Warm-up and cool-down exercises were performed before and after the training.

WBV training group: The training was given "Power Plate®" for eight weeks, twice in a week, and 30 minutes in a day. Warm-up and cool-down exercises were performed before and after the training.

Control group: The control group did not receive any training.

The body composition of the subjects was evaluated with body mass index, waist-hip ratio and bioelectrical impedance analysis; functional capacity with Shuttle Run Test; core endurance with lateral bridge test, modified Biering-Sorensen test, trunk flexion test and prone bridge test and functional core strength with sit-ups and modified push-up tests. The stability of the core muscles was also measured with a pressure biofeedback instrument. The Sit and Reach test was used to assess flexibility and the Functional Reach Test was used for balance. Fatigue was evaluated with The Fatigue Severity Scale and physical self-perception was assessed with the Physical Self Perception Profile. The subjects were evaluated pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 36
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Turkey
  • Ankara, Turkey, 06810
    • Başkent University

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 25 years to 45 years (ADULT)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Genders Eligible for Study: Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Individuals have not been exercising regularly in the last six months
• Physical activity level was between 600-3000 MET min/week (Metabolic equivalent minutes/week) according to the result of the "International Physical Activity Questionnaire"
• Bodyweight of less than 130 kg Individuals.

Exclusion Criteria:

• History of malignancy
• Pregnant individuals
• Musculoskeletal pain due to orthopedic or rheumatic diseases
• History of fractures in the past year
• Neurological disease (stroke, epilepsy, etc.)
• Chronic kidney or liver disease, cardiovascular diseases (cardiac arrhythmia, cardiac insufficiency, etc.)
• Imbalance due to peripheral vestibular disorder diagnosis (Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, Meniere's disease, etc.)
• Individuals who not be able to tolerate vibration for more than five minutes were not included in the study

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Interventional Model: FACTORIAL
• Masking: NONE

Number of Arms

3

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Pilates training group; In the Pilates group, the exercises were performed with "Reformer®" for eight weeks, twice in a week, one hour per day.	Other: Pilates exercises; Pilates exercises are a combined exercise procedure including strengthening and stretching. Pilates exercises are performed with different equipment for example; therabands, mats, reformer, etc.
EXPERIMENTAL: Whole-body vibration (WBV) group; In the WBV group, the training was given "Power Plate®" for eight weeks, twice in a week, and 30 minutes in a day.	Other: Whole body vibration; Whole-body vibration gives vibration to the body with a platform at different frequencies (Power-plate). The participant performed exercises on the platform.
NO_INTERVENTION: Control group; The control group did not receive any training.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Body Composition Change	The body composition of the subjects was evaluated with bioelectrical impedance analysis (Tanita BC 601,Tanita Corp., Maeno-Cho, Tokyo, Japan). Body fat proportion was recorded as a percentage.	Pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Body Mass Index	The body composition of the subjects was evaluated with body mass index (BMI). The BMI is a person's weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters. A high BMI can be an indicator of high body fatness.	Pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention
Waist-hip ratio	The body composition of the subjects was also evaluated with waist-hip ratio. The waist to hip ratio measurement is calculated by dividing the measurement of your waist by your hip measurement. The score recorded as centimeter.	Pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention
Aerobic capacity	The aerobic capacity of the participants was evaluated with Shuttle-run test. Shuttle run test involve repetitive running back and forth, either over the same distance, or with changing distances. The shorter trial recorded as seconds.	Pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention
Flexibility	The sit and reach test used for flexibility. Sit and reach test measures measures the flexibility of the lower back and hamstring muscles.The score is recorded to the nearest centimeter as the distance reached by the hand.	Pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention
Balance	The balance was evaluated by Functional reach test. The test evaluated dynamic balance and limit of stability. This test measures the distance between the length of an outstretched arm in a maximal forward reach from a standing position,while maintaining a fixed base of support. The score recorded as centimeter. Higher scores indicate good level of balance.	Pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention
Physical Self-Perception	Physical self-perception was assessed with Physical Self Perception Profile. The questionnaire has four subdomain subscales designed to assess perceived bodily attractiveness, sports competence, physical strength, and physical conditioning were constructed along with a general physical self-worth subscale as the basis of the Physical Self-Perception Profile.	Pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention
Fatigue Severity Scale	The 9-item scale which measures the severity of fatigue and its effect on a person's activities and lifestyle. Each item consists of statements that are scored on a seven-point Likert type scale ranging from 1 ("strongly disagree") to 7 ("strongly agree"). The higher scores indicates severe fatigue.	Pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention
Lateral Bridge test	Lateral bridge test involves static, isometric contractions of the lateral muscles on each side of the trunk that stabilize the spine. The score recorded as second. Higher scores indicate good level of endurance.	Pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention
Modified Biering-Sorensen test	Modified Biering-Sorensen test measuring how many seconds the subject is able to keep the unsupported upper body (from the upper border of the iliac crest) horizontal, while placed prone with the buttocks and legs fixed to the couch by three wide canvas straps and the arms folded across the chest. The score recorded as second. Higher scores indicate good level of endurance.	Pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention
Trunk flexion test	Trunk flexion test involving a static, isometric contraction of the anterior muscles, stabilizing the spine until the individual exhibits fatigue and can no longer hold the assumed position. The score recorded as second. Higher scores indicate good level of endurance.	Pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention
Prone bridge test	The prone bridge test measures the muscular endurance of the abdominal muscles.The score recorded as second. Higher scores indicate good level of endurance.	Pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention
Sit-ups test	The sit-ups test is a measure the endurance of the abdominal and hip-flexor muscles. The aim of this test is to perform as many sit-ups as you can in two minutes.	Pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention
Modified push-up test	The modified push-up test was used to measure upper body strength endurance and trunk stability. This variation, which uses a modified technique with a clap behind the back while in the 'down' position and a touch from one hand to the other in the 'up' position.The total number of correctly completed push-ups were recorded.	Pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Baskent University
• Investigators: Study Director: Ozlem Yuruk, Assoc. Prof., Başkent University

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (ACTUAL): August 20, 2018
• Primary Completion (ACTUAL): January 10, 2019
• Study Completion (ACTUAL): January 10, 2019

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: July 7, 2020
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: July 24, 2020
• First Posted (ACTUAL): July 29, 2020

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (ACTUAL): July 29, 2020
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: July 24, 2020
• Last Verified: July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: exercise; Physical fitness; Health
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Fatigue; Body Weight
• Other Study ID Numbers: KA18/268

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No