Pilates Exercises In Individuals With Fibromyalgia

January 3, 2020 updated by: Berna Cagla Caglayan

Investigation Of Effectiveness Of Reformer Pilates In Individuals With Fibromyalgia: Randomized Controlled Trial

This study investigated the effects of reformer pilates exercises in Fibromyalgia, which is a chronic musculoskeletal disease characterized by widespread pain in the body, on number of painful regions, disease activity, lower extremity muscle strength, functional mobility, balance, kinesophobia, fatigue, sleep quality, biopsychosocial status and quality of life and compared effects of clinical pilates-based home pilates which is performed on a mat.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In this study, effects of reformer pilates were evaluated by comparing with home mat pilates method. A total of 28 volunteer women who were diagnosed with FM according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 2016 criteria were included in the study. Reformer pilates group had 14 participants, home mat pilates group had 14 participants.

All individuals were evaluated by same physiotherapist according to standardized test protocols and in the same conditions at baseline and at the end of 6th week. Number of painful regions with Pain Location Inventory (PLI), disease activity with Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), lower extremity muscle strength with Chair Test, functional mobility with The Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), balance with Single Leg Stance Test, kinesiophobia with Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale, fatigue with Fatigue Severity Scale, sleep quality with Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), biopsychosocial status with Cognitive Exercise Therapy Approach- Biopsychosocial Questionnaire (BETY-BQ) and quality of life with Short Form-36 (SF-36) were evaluated.

Pilates exercises were performed by a certified and experienced physiotherapist in this field as two different methods (reformer group and home mat group) in 2 times a week for 6 weeks. Before starting treatment program, 5 key elements of clinical pilates exercises, which are breathing, focus, and placement of the rib cage, shoulder, head and neck, were taught to all patients. Participants were encouraged to focus and maintain these 5 key elements during all exercises.

Data were assessed using SPSS (Version 21.0). Continuous variables were stated as average, standard deviation and percentage. When parametric test assumptions were provided the Independent Samples Test was used, when parametric test assumptions were not provided Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the differences between the independent groups. When parametric test assumptions were provided, the Paired Simple T Test was used, when parametric test assumptions were not provided, Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the differences between the dependent groups. P value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

39

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Denizli, Turkey
        • Pamukkale University School of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 63 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • having FM diagnosis according to ACR 2016 criteria
  • aged 18-65
  • being stable in drug use for at least 3 months or more
  • being volunteer to participate in this study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • doing exercise regularly for the last 3 months
  • having orthopaedic and cardiopulmonary diseases which would prevent patients of doing exercise
  • neurological disorders
  • unstable endocrine system diseases
  • malignancy, pregnancy
  • severe psychological diseases
  • having undergone any surgery in the last 6 months
  • having communication problems.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Reformer pilates group
All participants were informed about the reformer machine and the treatment program by the physiotherapist in reformer pilates group. Reformer pilates exercises were applied in the form of general muscle strengthening and flexibility exercises under the supervision of physiotherapist. Exercises were performed in 2 times a week for 6 weeks. The duration of one session was 60 minutes.
The program consisted of 10 minutes warm-up exercises, reformer pilates exercises for 40 minutes and 10 minutes cool-down exercises. The exercises were started with 6-8 repetitions, increased to 1-2 repetitions each week and applied to be 12-15 repetitions in the last week. Increasing the resistance of the springs and adding different positions were used for progression of exercises.
Active Comparator: Home mat pilates group
In home mat pilates group, clinical pilates exercises were applied as a home program. Brochures and exercise follow-up forms, which illustrated and written all the exercises in this program, which consisted of clinical pilates-based general muscle strength and flexibility exercises, were given to all participants in this group. Exercises were performed in 2 times a week for 6 weeks at home. Participants marked the follow-up form when they performed exercises. Attendance of participants to exercise was checked by phone calls.
The program consisted of 10 minutes warm-up exercises, clinical pilates-based exercises on mat for 40 minutes and 10 minutes cool-down exercises. The exercises were started with 6-8 repetitions, increased to 1-2 repetitions each week, and applied to be 12-15 repetitions in the last week.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire
Time Frame: 1 year
It is a questionnaire consisting of 10 questions which assess physical health, work status, depression, anxiety, sleep, pain, fatigue, stiffness and well-being in order to evaluate health status and physical functionality of individuals with fibromyalgia.
1 year
Pain Location Inventory
Time Frame: 1 year
Participants mark the areas in which feel pain in last seven days from the 28 parts of the body. The score is between 0-28. Higher scores indicate having more number of painful body regions.
1 year
Chair Test
Time Frame: 1 year
In this test, which evaluates lower extremity muscle strength, participants sit and stand up as fast as possible for 30 seconds in a standard chair which is an average height of 44 cm and without back support and arm support. The number of repetitions which are completed were recorded
1 year
The Timed Up and Go Test
Time Frame: 1 year
In this test, where functional mobility was evaluated, the evaluation was started while the participant was sitting in the chair. It recorded the time that a participant took to rise from a chair, walked three meters, turned around, walked back to the chair, and sat down
1 year
Single Leg Stance Test
Time Frame: 1 year
This test evaluate participant's balance. The participant must stand unassisted on one leg and is timed in seconds from the time one foot is flexed off the floor to the time when it touches the ground.
1 year
Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale
Time Frame: 1 year
It is a 17-item scale that assesses fear of movement/ repeat injury. The range of total score are from 17 to 68. High score indicates that the person has high kinesiophobia
1 year
Fatigue Severity Scale
Time Frame: 1 year
It was developed to evaluate the severity of fatigue in the last week. The range of total score are from 1 to 7. Higher scores indicate more severity of fatigue
1 year
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Time Frame: 1 year
It was developed to identify good and poor sleep and to evaluate sleep quality. Scoring of the answers is based on a 0 to 3 scale, whereby 3 reflects the negative extreme on the Likert Scale. A global sum of "5"or greater indicates a "poor" sleeper.
1 year
Cognitive Exercise Therapy Approach- Biopsychosocial Questionnaire
Time Frame: 1 year
This scale, which was developed in Turkish and consists of 30 items, was used to evaluate the disease-related biopsychosocial process. The range of total score are from 0 to 120. Higher scores indicate bad biopsychosocial status of patients.
1 year
Short Form-36
Time Frame: 1 year
This scale is one of the most commonly used questionnaires to assess quality of life. "100 points" indicate good health status and "0 points" indicate poor health status.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Bilge Basakcı Calık, Assoc.Prof., Pamukkale University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 14, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 2, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

October 11, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 31, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 2, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

January 6, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 7, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 3, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fibromyalgia

Clinical Trials on Reformer pilates exercises

3
Subscribe