High vs. Standard Dose Rifampicin for Effusive Tuberculous Pericarditis (IMPI-3)

February 29, 2024 updated by: Mpiko Ntsekhe, University of Cape Town

IMPI-3 - A Randomized Controlled Trial of High vs. Standard Dose Rifampicin for Effusive Tuberculous Pericarditis

The investigators hypothesise that high dose RIF (RIF35) will increase pericardial fluid RIF exposure and so enhance mycobacterial clearance, compared to standard of care dosing (RIF10).

This Phase 2b randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial will evaluate the efficacy and safety of RIF 35mg/kg compared 10mg/kg, added to standard first-line ATT, for the treatment of PCTB.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

IMPI-3 - A Randomized Controlled Trial of High vs. Standard Dose Rifampicin for Effusive Tuberculous Pericarditis

Phase 2b Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded clinical trial

The trial will enroll 100 adult participants with pericardial TB from two research sites in South Africa, with no exclusions being made on the basis of sex/gender, racial or ethnic group.

Consenting participants will be stratified by HIV status and PCF GX-Ultra status, then randomized 1:1 to receive either standard of care anti-tuberculosis treatment (ATT) or standard of care plus high dose Rifampicin (RIF), both administered orally for 2 months, followed by a continuation phase of 4 months' RH at standard doses.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Eastern Cape
      • Mthatha, Eastern Cape, South Africa, 5099
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Nelson Mandela Academic Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Khulile Moeketsi, Dr
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Samuel Alomatu, Dr
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Thandazile Obed Fathuse, Dr
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Pamela Mda, Dr
    • Western Cape
      • Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa, 7925
        • Recruiting
        • Groote Schuur Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Mpiko Ntsekhe, PhD
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Robert J Wilkinson, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Sean Wasserman, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Kishal Lukhna, Dr
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Vanessa Mabiala, Dr

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Aged >18 years
  2. Suspected PCTB with confirmed pericardial effusion on echocardiography (i.e., echo free space of ≥1 cm anterior to the right ventricle in diastole)
  3. Consent to study participation including testing for HIV-1 (if HIV status is unknown)
  4. Microbiologically detected Mtb in PCF or diagnosis of probable PCTB. Probable PCTB (in the absence of a positive pericardial fluid culture) will be defined as per Mayosi et al.4:

    1. Evidence of pericarditis with microbiologic confirmation of Mtb- infection elsewhere in the body and/or
    2. Exudative, lymphocyte predominant effusion with elevated adenosine deaminase (≥35 U/L)
  5. Participant will undergo pericardiocentesis (as per clinical indication)
  6. Within 5 days of ATT initiation

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Glomerular filtration rate <30ml/min or renal failure requiring dialysis
  2. Rifampin-resistant TB
  3. Severe concurrent opportunistic infection
  4. Contraindication to placement of intra-pericardial catheter
  5. Failed pericardiocentesis procedure and/or failure of placement of intra-pericardial catheter
  6. Any disease or condition in which the use of the standard anti-TB drugs (or any of their components) are contraindicated. This includes, but is not limited to, allergy to any TB drug or their components.
  7. In females: a positive urine pregnancy test result
  8. Confirmed autoimmune disorders (e.g. systemic lupus erythematosus)

Additional Exclusions for Gadolinium contrasted CMR

  1. Any implanted devices that are not MR compatible (e.g. pacemaker, defibrillators, cerebral aneurysm clips, cochlear implants etc.)
  2. Claustrophobia
  3. Gadolinium allergy
  4. Inability to lie on a flat surface for prolonged periods of time (e.g. severe congestive cardiac failure)
  5. Breastfeeding

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Arm 1: Standard of care (RIF10)
Dosing of the daily oral RHZE fixed dose combination (FDC) will be according to WHO weight bands
Experimental: Arm 2: High-dose RIF (RIF35)
Simulations were performed to determine the dose of RIF required to achieve the most equitable drug exposures across the weight range, 30 to 100 kg. Demographic data of a reference cohort of TB patients (n = 1225), with or without HIV-1 coinfection, recruited in clinical trials conducted in West Africa and South Africa were used for the simulations35-38. An additional 12 250 virtual patients were generated using the weight and height distributions of the 1225 patients to increase the number of patients with a weight close to the boundaries of the weight range. Parameter estimates of the population PK model for RIF were used to simulate (100 replicates) RIF exposures22. Four dosing scenarios were evaluated using the weight-band based dosing with 4-drug FDC tablets and extra RIF tablets with each tablet containing 150 mg or 600 mg RIF. The FDC tablets were assumed to have 20% reduced bioavailability based on data from a clinical trial where the same formulation was used39
Simulations were performed to determine the dose of RIF required to achieve the most equitable drug exposures across the weight range, 30 to 100 kg. Demographic data of a reference cohort of TB patients (n = 1225), with or without HIV-1 coinfection, recruited in clinical trials conducted in West Africa and South Africa were used for the simulations35-38. An additional 12 250 virtual patients were generated using the weight and height distributions of the 1225 patients to increase the number of patients with a weight close to the boundaries of the weight range. Parameter estimates of the population PK model for RIF were used to simulate (100 replicates) RIF exposures22. Four dosing scenarios were evaluated using the weight-band based dosing with 4-drug FDC tablets and extra RIF tablets with each tablet containing 150 mg or 600 mg RIF. The FDC tablets were assumed to have 20% reduced bioavailability based on data from a clinical trial where the same formulation was used

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Drug exposure in PCF and mediates in Mtb load
Time Frame: 72 hours and 52 weeks
To determine whether higher dose rifampicin (35mg/kg) increases pericardial fluid (AUC) RIF levels and increases time to positivity of mycobacterial culture at 72 hours compared to standard dose Rifampicin
72 hours and 52 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mortality between study arms
Time Frame: week 8 and 52 weeks
To investigate clinical outcome by mortality (attributable to PCTB and all cause)
week 8 and 52 weeks
re-accumulation of pericardial effusion between study arms
Time Frame: 52 weeks
To investigate clinical outcome by comparing clinical evidence of constrictive pericarditis between study arms
52 weeks
TB-IRIS between study arms
Time Frame: 52 weeks
To investigate clinical outcome by comparison of the incidence of TB immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (TB-IRIS) between study arms
52 weeks
Constrictive pericarditis between the study arms
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Comparison of the incidence of constrictive pericarditis between the study arms
52 weeks
CMR evidence
Time Frame: 52 weeks

To investigate clinical outcome by evidence on week 52 CMR of:

  1. Constrictive physiology
  2. Pericardial inflammation
  3. Pericardial thickening
  4. Pericardial fibrosis
  5. Inflammatory exudative or hemorrhagic pericardial effusion
52 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To investigate the safety and tolerability of RIF35 for PCTB by:
Time Frame: week 8 and 52 weeks
  1. The occurrence of Grade 3 or 4 transaminitis during ATT
  2. Permanent discontinuation of the RIF10 or RIF35 ATT arm at week 8
week 8 and 52 weeks
Discontinuation rate
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Comparison of discontinuation rates between study arms Comparison of discontinuation rates between study arms
52 weeks
Change in Mtb bacterial load
Time Frame: 72 hours
To investigate early change in Mtb bacterial load by measures other than culture TTP (CFU, Xpert ct values, ddPCR, CEQ, Mtb RNA, FujiLAM) in PCF over 72 hours by treatment allocation
72 hours
Relationships between pericardial Mtb-specific T cells with Mtb bacterial load
Time Frame: 52 weeks
To determine relationships between pericardial Mtb-specific T cells with Mtb bacterial load, treatment response and outcome in PCTB
52 weeks
Mtb-induced markers of host cell death pathways and Mtb bacterial load in PCTB
Time Frame: 52 weeks
To assess whether there is association between Mtb-induced markers of host cell death pathways and Mtb bacterial load in PCTB
52 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mpiko U Ntsekhe, Professor, Department of Cardiology, Groote Schuur Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 10, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 15, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 28, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 16, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 21, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

March 1, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 29, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV Status

Clinical Trials on high dose Rifampicin (RIF)

3
Subscribe