Optimizing Treatment to Improve TBM Outcomes in Children (TBM-KIDS)

October 27, 2021 updated by: Johns Hopkins University

Phase I/II Randomized, Open-label Trial to Evaluate the PK, Safety, and Outcomes of Treatment Including High Dose Rifampicin +/- Levofloxacin vs Standard Treatment for Pediatric Tuberculous Meningitis (TBM)

In this open-labeled, randomized clinical trial, the Investigator will assess the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of model-optimized doses of rifampicin (RIF) with or without levofloxacin (LEVO) given to children as part of multidrug treatment for tuberculous meningitis (TBM) versus standard treatment. The Investigators will also assess functional and neurocognitive outcomes by treatment group, as measured by the Pediatric Modified Rankin Score (MRS) and the Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL), respectively.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Open-label, randomized clinical trial in three treatment groups. Patients with probable or definite TB meningitis (TBM) will all receive isoniazid and pyrazinamide at standard doses for 8 weeks. Arm 1 participants will receive high-dose rifampicin plus ethambutol (EMB) at standard doses for 8 weeks. Arm 2 participants will receive high-dose rifampicin plus levofloxacin for 8 weeks. Arm 3 participants will receive rifampicin plus ethambutol at standard doses for 8 weeks (control arm). Patients will be screened to confirm TBM diagnosis, will receive 8 weeks of study treatment, and then will receive isoniazid (INH)/rifampicin for an additional 40 weeks, to complete 12 months of TBM treatment. All participants will receive oral steroids. PK sampling will be performed within first week and 6 (+/- 2) weeks following treatment initiation. Participants will have scheduled follow-up visits to assess safety and clinical status. In addition, functional and neurocognitive outcomes up to 18 months following treatment initiation will be assessed. Interim PK and safety analyses will be performed to ensure dosing is producing predefined PK targets and safety is acceptable. It is anticipated that a majority of children will be hospitalized for the initial 2-8 weeks of the study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

38

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maharashtra
      • Pune, Maharashtra, India, 411001
        • Byramji Jeejeebhoy Government Medical College and Sassoon Hospital
    • Tamil Nadu
      • Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, 600031
        • National Institute of Research in TB and Institute of Child Health
    • Lilongwe District
      • Lilongwe, Lilongwe District, Malawi
        • UNC Project- Malawi

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 months to 12 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Weight > 6kg
  • Age ≥ 6 months to < 12 years and, in the opinion of the investigator, can tolerate the treatment and study participation.
  • Probable or definite TBM according to diagnostic criteria or a positive Gene Xpert cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) test.
  • Since participants will all be under legal age of independent consent, a parent or legal guardian must be willing and able to provide informed consent. If the subject is of appropriate age, she/he will also be asked to give assent if developmentally appropriate and clinically possible.
  • Participant can comply with the protocol requirements in the opinion of the site investigator.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • TB treatment for > 7 days
  • Exposure via close contact with someone with multi drug resistant TB (MDR-TB) (or rifampicin mono-resistant TB) or personal history of MDR-TB (or rifampicin mono-resistant TB)
  • Known intolerance or allergy to any of the study drugs
  • Death imminent and expected within 24 hours, as assessed by the site investigator
  • Moderate to severe renal or liver dysfunction (Grade 2 or higher abnormalities of creatinine, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), or direct bilirubin)
  • HIV infection with any of the following:

Planned initiation of antiretroviral treatment (ART) during the experimental treatment phase (first 8 weeks), as initiation of ART is contraindicated in that time period with TBM.

On ART with planned continued use of a protease inhibitor or nevirapine (children can be switched to an acceptable alternative regimen and then participate)

  • Having participated in other clinical studies with investigational agents or treatments within 8 weeks prior to enrollment.
  • A clinically significant active medical condition or the presence of any concomitant severe illness or rapidly deteriorating health condition (outside of TB), which, in the opinion of the site investigator, would prevent appropriate participation in the trial, or that would make implementation of the protocol or interpretation of the study results difficult, or otherwise make the subject a poor candidate for a clinical trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: high dose RIF, INH, PZA, EMB
Arm 1 participants will receive high-dose rifampicin for 8 weeks plus ethambutol at standard doses, in addition to standard doze pyrazinamide (PZA) and isoniazid.
high-dose rifampicin plus standard dose H,Z,E, given for 8 weeks in treatment Arms 1 and 2
Other Names:
  • Rifampin
Experimental: high dose RIF, INH, PZA, LEVO
Arm 2 participants will receive high-dose rifampicin plus levofloxacin for 8 weeks, in addition to standard doze pyrazinamide and isoniazid.
high-dose rifampicin plus standard dose H,Z, with levofloxacin substituted for ethambutol for 8 weeks in treatment Arm 2
Other Names:
  • Levaquin
Active Comparator: standard dose RIF, INH, PZA, EMB
Arm 3 participants will receive standard of care dose rifampicin plus ethambutol for 8 weeks, in addition to standard doze pyrazinamide and isoniazid.
standard doses of R,H,Z,E given for 8 weeks in treatment Arm 3, control arm.
Other Names:
  • control group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Characterize the Volume of Distribution (Vd) in plasma of rifampicin given at model-derived optimal daily doses in children ages 6 months to 12 years of age with TBM.
Time Frame: Weeks 1-16
Apparent volume of distribution estimated using population PK model
Weeks 1-16
Characterize the Oral Clearance (CL/F) in plasma of rifampicin given at model-derived optimal daily doses in children ages 6 months to 12 years of age with TBM.
Time Frame: Weeks 1-16

Examines the apparent total clearance of rifampicin from plasma after oral administration.

Unit of Measure: Volume/time or volume/time/kg

Weeks 1-16
Characterize the Rate of Absorption (ka) in plasma of rifampicin given at model-derived optimal daily doses in children ages 6 months to 12 years of age with TBM.
Time Frame: Weeks 1-16
Examines the absorption rate constant for orally administered rifampicin. Unit of Measure: will be represented as a decimal.
Weeks 1-16
Characterize the Penetration Coefficient in CSF of rifampicin given at model-derived optimal daily doses in children ages 6 months to 12 years of age with TBM.
Time Frame: Weeks 1 and 6
Examines the ratio of CSF concentration to Plasma concentration of rifampicin Unit of Measure: will be represented as a decimal
Weeks 1 and 6
Characterize the Volume of Distribution (Vd) in plasma of levofloxacin given at model-derived optimal daily doses in children ages 6 months to 12 years of age with TBM.
Time Frame: Weeks 1-16

Examines the apparent volume in which levofloxacin is distributed (i.e., the parameter relating drug concentration to drug amount in the body).

Unit of measure: Liter (L)

Weeks 1-16
Characterize the Volume of Distribution (Vd) in plasma of levofloxacin given at model-derived optimal daily doses in children ages 6 months to 12 years of age with TBM.
Time Frame: Week 4

Examines the apparent volume in which levofloxacin is distributed (i.e., the parameter relating drug concentration to drug amount in the body).

Unit of measure: Liter (L)

Week 4
Characterize the Volume of Distribution (Vd) in plasma of levofloxacin given at model-derived optimal daily doses in children ages 6 months to 12 years of age with TBM.
Time Frame: Week 8

Examines the apparent volume in which levofloxacin is distributed (i.e., the parameter relating drug concentration to drug amount in the body).

Unit of measure: Liter (L)

Week 8
Characterize the Volume of Distribution (Vd) in plasma of levofloxacin given at model-derived optimal daily doses in children ages 6 months to 12 years of age with TBM.
Time Frame: Week 16

Examines the apparent volume in which levofloxacin is distributed (i.e., the parameter relating drug concentration to drug amount in the body).

Unit of measure: Liter (L)

Week 16
Characterize the Oral Clearance (CL/F) in plasma of levofloxacin given at model-derived optimal daily doses in children ages 6 months to 12 years of age with TBM.
Time Frame: Weeks 1-16

Examines the apparent total clearance of levofloxacin from plasma after oral administration.

Unit of Measure: Volume/time or volume/time/kg

Weeks 1-16
Characterize the Oral Clearance (CL/F) in plasma of levofloxacin given at model-derived optimal daily doses in children ages 6 months to 12 years of age with TBM.
Time Frame: Week 4

Examines the apparent total clearance of levofloxacin from plasma after oral administration.

Unit of Measure: Volume/time or volume/time/kg

Week 4
Characterize the Oral Clearance (CL/F) in plasma of levofloxacin given at model-derived optimal daily doses in children ages 6 months to 12 years of age with TBM.
Time Frame: Week 8

Examines the apparent total clearance of levofloxacin from plasma after oral administration.

Unit of Measure: Volume/time or volume/time/kg

Week 8
Characterize the Rate of Absorption (ka) in plasma of levofloxacin given at model-derived optimal daily doses in children ages 6 months to 12 years of age with TBM.
Time Frame: Weeks 1-16
Examines the absorption rate constant for orally administered levofloxacin. Unit of Measure: will be represented as a decimal.
Weeks 1-16
Characterize the Rate of Absorption (ka) in plasma of levofloxacin given at model-derived optimal daily doses in children ages 6 months to 12 years of age with TBM.
Time Frame: Week 4
Examines the absorption rate constant for orally administered levofloxacin. Unit of Measure: will be represented as a decimal.
Week 4
Characterize the Rate of Absorption (ka) in plasma of levofloxacin given at model-derived optimal daily doses in children ages 6 months to 12 years of age with TBM.
Time Frame: Week 16
Examines the absorption rate constant for orally administered levofloxacin. Unit of Measure: will be represented as a decimal.
Week 16
Characterize the Penetration Coefficient in CSF of levofloxacin given at model-derived optimal daily doses in children ages 6 months to 12 years of age with TBM.
Time Frame: Weeks 1 and 6
Examines the ratio of CSF to Plasma concentration of levofloxacin Unit of Measure: will be represented as a decimal
Weeks 1 and 6
Assess the relationship between RIF concentrations and longitudinal functional outcomes as measured by longitudinal Modified Rankin Score (MRS) for children
Time Frame: 48 weeks
At the end of treatment, all participants' RIF concentrations (Cmax and AUC) will be compared across time against their MRS scores. MRS parameters and their scores (in parentheses) as follows: No symptoms at all (0),No significant disabilities despite symptoms in clinical examination; age appropriate behaviour and further development (1),Slight disability; unable to carry out all previous activities, but same independence as other age- and sex-matched children (no reduction of levels on the gross motor function scale) (2),Moderate disability; requiring some help, but able to walk without assistance; in younger patients adequate motor development despite mild functional impairment (reduction of one level on the gross motor function scale) (3), Moderately severe disability; unable to walk without assistance; in younger patients reduction of at least 2 levels on the gross motor function scale (4),Severe disability; bedridden, requiring constant nursing care and attention (5),
48 weeks
To evaluate the safety of TBM treatment over eight weeks, by treatment Arm, as measured by Grade 3 or higher adverse events
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Grade 3 Adverse Events as defined by the Division of AIDS (DAIDS) Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events
8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Describe neurocognitive outcomes among children ages 6 months to 6 years of age who are treated for TBM, longitudinally over 18 months, by treatmentArm, as measured by the Mullen Gross Motor Scale
Time Frame: 72 weeks

The Gross Motor Scale is used to assess infants who are 33 months of age or younger and provides information about the child's kinesthetic experience.

Maximum Raw Scores of Gross Motor Scale: 36 Raw scores are converted to T Scores (A type of standardized score) based on the child's age.

A T Score has a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. A T Score between 20 and 30 (or less than 20) has a descriptive category of "Very Low" A T Score between 31 and 39 has a descriptive category of "Below Average" A T Score between 40 and 60 has a descriptive category of "Average" A T Score between 61 and 69 has a descriptive category of "Above Average" A T Score between 70 and 80 has a descriptive category of "Very High"

72 weeks
Describe neurocognitive outcomes among children ages 6 months to 6 years of age who are treated for TBM, longitudinally over 18 months, by treatmentArm, as measured by the Mullen Visual Reception Scale
Time Frame: Week 72

A cognitive score that may be derived from children ages birth to 68 months of age.

The Visual Reception Scale assesses visual processing skills through isolation of oculomotor and visual-motor operations. This scale minimizes the motor output required to execute the response and eliminates the need for verbalized responses.

Maximum Raw Scores of the Visual Reception Scale: 50 Raw scores are converted to T Scores (A type of standardized score) based on the child's age.

A T Score has a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. A T Score between 20 and 30 (or less than 20) has a descriptive category of "Very Low" A T Score between 31 and 39 has a descriptive category of "Below Average" A T Score between 40 and 60 has a descriptive category of "Average" A T Score between 61 and 69 has a descriptive category of "Above Average" A T Score between 70 and 80 has a descriptive category of "Very High"

Week 72
Describe neurocognitive outcomes among children ages 6 months to 6 years of age who are treated for TBM, longitudinally over 18 months, by treatmentArm, as measured by the Mullen Fine Motor Scale
Time Frame: Week 72

A cognitive score that may be derived from children ages birth to 68 months of age.

The Fine Motor Scale emphasizes the output aspect of visual organization by assessing visual-motor skills, such as motor planning, motor control, and writing readiness.

Maximum Raw Scores of the Fine Motor Scale: 49 Raw scores are converted to T Scores (A type of standardized score) based on the child's age.

A T Score has a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. A T Score between 20 and 30 (or less than 20) has a descriptive category of "Very Low" A T Score between 31 and 39 has a descriptive category of "Below Average" A T Score between 40 and 60 has a descriptive category of "Average" A T Score between 61 and 69 has a descriptive category of "Above Average" A T Score between 70 and 80 has a descriptive category of "Very High"

Week 72
Describe neurocognitive outcomes among children ages 6 months to 6 years of age who are treated for TBM, longitudinally over 18 months, by treatmentArm, as measured by the Mullen Receptive Language Scale
Time Frame: Week 72

A cognitive score that may be derived from children ages birth to 68 months of age.

The Receptive Language Scale evaluates the ability to decode verbal input through tasks requiring auditory discrimination, linguistic conceptualization, sequencing, and use of spatial concepts.

Maximum Raw Scores of the Fine Motor Scale: 48 Raw scores are converted to T Scores (A type of standardized score) based on the child's age.

A T Score has a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. A T Score between 20 and 30 (or less than 20) has a descriptive category of "Very Low" A T Score between 31 and 39 has a descriptive category of "Below Average" A T Score between 40 and 60 has a descriptive category of "Average" A T Score between 61 and 69 has a descriptive category of "Above Average" A T Score between 70 and 80 has a descriptive category of "Very High"

Week 72
Describe neurocognitive outcomes among children ages 6 months to 6 years of age who are treated for TBM, longitudinally over 18 months, by treatmentArm, as measured by the Mullen Expressive Language Scale
Time Frame: Week 72

A cognitive score that may be derived from children ages birth to 68 months of age.

The Expressive Language Scale focuses on the child's use of spoken language for communication and expression during spontaneous utterances and during specific vocal or verbal responses to tasks.

Maximum Raw Scores of the Fine Motor Scale: 50 Raw scores are converted to T Scores (A type of standardized score) based on the child's age.

A T Score has a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. A T Score between 20 and 30 (or less than 20) has a descriptive category of "Very Low" A T Score between 31 and 39 has a descriptive category of "Below Average" A T Score between 40 and 60 has a descriptive category of "Average" A T Score between 61 and 69 has a descriptive category of "Above Average" A T Score between 70 and 80 has a descriptive category of "Very High"

Week 72
Describe TBM treatment outcomes at 12 months which will be classified as favorable (cured or treatment completed) or unfavorable (death, lost to follow up, treatment failure, transferred out) at 48 weeks.
Time Frame: 48 weeks
TB treatment outcomes , favorable or unfavorable
48 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 22, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 15, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

November 15, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 4, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

November 8, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 28, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 27, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tuberculosis, Meningeal

Clinical Trials on High-dose: RIF, INH, PZA, EMB

3
Subscribe