Does Quality of Life Decline During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Can we Change Behaviour to Improve Poor Quality of Life?

September 29, 2021 updated by: Tracy Epton, University of Manchester
The response to COVID-19 means social isolation/distancing for the majority of the UK. This has the potential to negatively affect all domains of quality of life (QoL). QoL can be improved by giving feedback on gaps between someone's perceived QoL in a domain and how important it is to them (plus prompting reflective questions). However, interventions that are designed to improve QoL may increase the effectiveness of this as optimised behaviour change techniques can be used. This study aims to develop and test a quality of life intervention during social isolation/distancing.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The response to COVID-19 means social isolation/distancing for the majority of the UK. This has the potential to negatively affect all domains of quality of life (QoL). QoL can be improved by giving feedback on gaps between someone's perceived QoL in a domain and how important it is to them (plus prompting reflective questions). However, interventions that are designed to improve QoL may increase the effectiveness of this as optimised behaviour change techniques can be used. This study aims to develop and test a quality of life intervention during social isolation/distancing.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

274

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Cheshire
      • Manchester, Cheshire, United Kingdom, M13 9PT
        • University of Manchester - online

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 18+ years
  • Living in United Kingdom during COVID-19 pandemic.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • English language - all participants are required to be able to read and understand English to participate.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Feedback Intervention

All participants will complete an online questionnaire. This will include demographic information, social distancing/isolation history, The Lubben Social Network Scale, The 6-item Loneliness Scale, Ten-Item Personality Scale, Spontaneous Self-affirmation Scale, Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire and the WHOQoL COMBI plus importance of QOL facet questions.

Participants randomly allocated to the feedback intervention will then be provided with graphs showing WHOQOL COMBI facet scores and their perceived importance ratings. The graphs will highlight where quality of life might be poor but important to the participant. Participants will be asked three questions (i.e. how could your QoL in this domain be improved, what resources would you need to make this change, what practical actions are needed to address the discrepancies in your QoL?) to help them plan how they might be able to improve quality of life currently rated as poor but important.

The intervention targets each facet of the five domains of WHOQOL COMBI. The intervention is based on the COM-B Framework (Michie et al., 2012) and utilises behaviour change techniques to help participants change their behaviour to improve their quality of life.

The intervention will be compared to an active comparator 'feedback intervention' and a waitlist control group.

Experimental: Extended Intervention

All participants will complete an online questionnaire (as described above).

Participants randomly allocated to the extended intervention will then be provided with graphs to highlight differences between their actual WHOQoL COMBI scores and their perceived importance ratings. The graphs will highlight where quality of life might be poor but important to the participant. Participants will be asked three questions (i.e. how could your QoL in this domain be improved, what resources would you need to make this change, what practical actions are needed to address the discrepancies in your QoL?) to help them plan how they might be able to improve quality of life currently rated as poor but important.

Participants will then receive an online intervention that will provide them with behaviour change techniques to help them address the discrepancies in the relevant quality of life domains.

The intervention targets each facet of the five domains of WHOQOL COMBI. The intervention is based on the COM-B Framework (Michie et al., 2012) and utilises behaviour change techniques to help participants change their behaviour to improve their quality of life.

The intervention will be compared to an active comparator 'feedback intervention' and a waitlist control group.

Other: Waitlist Control

All participants will complete an online questionnaire. This will include demographic information, social distancing/isolation history, The Lubben Social Network Scale, The 6-item Loneliness Scale, Ten-Item Personality Scale, Spontaneous Self-affirmation Scale, Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire and the WHOQoL COMBI plus importance of QOL facet questions.

Participants randomly allocated to the waitlist control group will then receive their WHOQoL COMBI scores only, with no information about differences between quality of life and importance or intervention materials.

The intervention targets each facet of the five domains of WHOQOL COMBI. The intervention is based on the COM-B Framework (Michie et al., 2012) and utilises behaviour change techniques to help participants change their behaviour to improve their quality of life.

The intervention will be compared to an active comparator 'feedback intervention' and a waitlist control group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in World Health Organisation Quality of Life Combination
Time Frame: Change from baseline quality of life to 2 weeks post intervention
Measure of quality of life, score ranges from 0-100 per domain, with a higher score indicating greater quality of life
Change from baseline quality of life to 2 weeks post intervention
Change in World Health Organisation Quality of Life Combination
Time Frame: Change from baseline quality of life to 3 months post intervention
Measure of quality of life, score ranges from 0-100 per domain, with a higher score
Change from baseline quality of life to 3 months post intervention
Change in World Health Organisation Quality of Life Combination
Time Frame: Change from baseline quality of life to 6 months post intervention
Measure of quality of life, score ranges from 0-100 per domain, with a higher score
Change from baseline quality of life to 6 months post intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in The Lubben Social Network Scale
Time Frame: Change from baseline social isolation to 2 weeks post intervention
Measure of social isolation, score ranges between 0 and 30, with a higher score indicating more social engagement.
Change from baseline social isolation to 2 weeks post intervention
Change in The Lubben Social Network Scale
Time Frame: Change from baseline social isolation to 3 months post intervention
Measure of social isolation, score ranges between 0 and 30, with a higher score indicating more social engagement.
Change from baseline social isolation to 3 months post intervention
Change in The Lubben Social Network Scale
Time Frame: Change from baseline social isolation to 6 months post intervention
Measure of social isolation, score ranges between 0 and 30, with a higher score indicating more social engagement.
Change from baseline social isolation to 6 months post intervention
Change in 6-Item Loneliness Scale
Time Frame: Change from baseline loneliness to 2 weeks post intervention
Measure of loneliness, score ranges between 0 and 50, with a higher score indicating less loneliness.
Change from baseline loneliness to 2 weeks post intervention
Change in 6-Item Loneliness Scale
Time Frame: Change from baseline loneliness to 3 months post intervention
Measure of loneliness, score ranges between 0 and 50, with a higher score indicating less loneliness.
Change from baseline loneliness to 3 months post intervention
Change in 6-Item Loneliness Scale
Time Frame: Change from baseline loneliness to 6 months post intervention
Measure of loneliness, score ranges between 0 and 50, with a higher score indicating less loneliness.
Change from baseline loneliness to 6 months post intervention
Quality of Life Importance Ratings
Time Frame: Change from baseline importance to 2 weeks post intervention
Measure of importance of different facets of quality of life, score ranges 0-200, with a higher score indicating greater importance of quality of life.
Change from baseline importance to 2 weeks post intervention
Quality of Life Importance Ratings
Time Frame: Change from baseline importance to 3 months post intervention
Measure of importance of different facets of quality of life, score ranges 0-200, with a higher score indicating greater importance of quality of life.
Change from baseline importance to 3 months post intervention
Quality of Life Importance Ratings
Time Frame: Change from baseline importance to 6 months post intervention
Measure of importance of different facets of quality of life, score ranges 0-200, with a higher score indicating greater importance of quality of life.
Change from baseline importance to 6 months post intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tracy Epton, University of Manchester

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 22, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 12, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 21, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 30, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 29, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

WHOQOL COMBI data cannot be shared with researchers outside of the research team.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on Behaviour Change Technique Intervention to Improve Quality of Life

3
Subscribe