PEP Flute-selfcare in COVID-19 (PEP-CoV)

March 21, 2022 updated by: Berit Lilienthal Heitmann, Bispebjerg Hospital

PEP Flute-selfcare to Prevent Respiratory Deterioration and Hospitalization Among COVID-19 Patients: a Randomized Trial

Most research on the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 disease relate to screening measures, development of vaccines and optimising treatment of hospitalised patients. It is likely that this pandemic will be ongoing for several years until a high level of immunity is reached in the population or a vaccine has been developed. Thus, there is a need of measures to help the SARS-CoV-2 infected individual at home to overcome the course of disease with less symptoms and strain. A Positive Expiratory Pressure (PEP) flute is feasible for home use and it is possible that regular use of PEP flute may prevent the progression of respiratory symptoms in non-hospitalized individuals with COVID-19 disease.

The primary objective of the study is to examine the effect of PEP flute use among SARS-CoV-2 infected, non-hospitalized patients on self-reported change in COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score during 30 days of follow-up.

The secondary objectives are to compare the development in hospitalization rates and use of antibiotics in the intervention group and the control group during the follow-up period.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

It is hypothesized that the PEP flute has positive effects on SARS-CoV-2 infected individual's self-reported respiratory symptoms such as dyspnoea, coughing and perceived mucus clearance through beneficial effects on lung function and airway clearance. Furthermore, the investigators expect a lower rate of hospitalization and use of antibiotics in the intervention group as compared to the control group.

Finally, potential subgroup effects by gender, age, comorbidity and BMI at study entry will be explored for all outcomes.

Based upon a sample size estimation the investigators assess that inclusion of 200 participants in each intervention arm will be an adequate number. Based on the present testing strategy and COVID-19 incidence, current expectations are that two months should be enough to recruit 400 patients. The investigators will allow for recruitment to the end of December 2020, but will terminate enrolment at n = 400.

Link to detailed protocol paper will be added once published.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

378

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Frederiksberg, Denmark, 2000
        • Research Unit for Dietary Studies at the Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospitals

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Positive SARS-CoV-2
  • Symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection e.g. fever, cough and shortness of breath.
  • Access to use a smartphone
  • Can reply to a questionnaire (sent on email, text messages or via telephone interview) in Danish
  • Given informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 18 years.
  • Any condition or impairment that, in the opinion of the investigator, makes a potential participant unsuitable for participation or which obstruct participation, such as psychiatric disorders.
  • Hospitalised patients or citizens living in nursing homes

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment group

The participants will be handed three airway resistances equivalent to a resistance of 10-20 cm H2O alongside one PEP flute. Two videos will guide the participants in use of the PEP flute; one with instructions of the rationale and how to use the flute, including how to choose the suitable resistance and one video, which gives instructions of hygienic maintenance.

Participants in the intervention group will be advised to continue use of their PEP flute in the active intervention period of 30 days or at least if they still have respiratory symptoms. They will receive daily text-messages to prompt their reporting and to use the PEP flute according to instructions.

Participants are advised to use a PEP flute at least three times daily at an appropriate resistance. Ideally, each session consists of 15 breaths (for approximately 1 minute) repeated twice at an upright position.
No Intervention: Control group
The participants in the control group will receive daily text-messages to prompt their reporting of CAT-scores. To avoid attrition of the trial due to early recovery of symptoms, the project manager will call the participants by phone at day 15 to ask them about their present condition (i.e. CAT-score) and address potential concerns of continued participation of the trial. Otherwise, they will only receive usual care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-reported CAT-score (COPD Assessment Test)
Time Frame: Day 30.
CAT-scores will be measured using a telephone administered questionnaire. The CAT-score is validated to evaluate symptoms in COPD patients. Eight items covers symptoms of cough, sputum, chest pain, dyspnoea, activities of daily living at home, feeling safe at home despite symptoms (modified for the present study from feeling safe at leaving home despite symptoms), sleep quality and vigour. The eight items sum up to a range of 0-40 with higher scores indicating more respiratory impairment. Although validated for COPD-use, the CAT-scale is considered useful in the present study because several of the items (dyspnoea, cough, fatigue, sputum and pleuritic chest pain) previously have been used as outcome variables in pneumonia studies. The outcome assessment can be taken within + 1 week for the scheduled visit.
Day 30.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hospital admissions
Time Frame: Up to day 30, 90 and 180.
Will be obtained from the Danish National Patient Registry, from which also data of comorbidity will be retrieved.
Up to day 30, 90 and 180.
Use of antibiotics
Time Frame: Up to day 30, 90 and 180.
Will be obtained from the Danish National Prescription Registry.
Up to day 30, 90 and 180.
Self-reported CAT-score (COPD Assessment Test)
Time Frame: Day 90, Day 180.
CAT-scores will be measured using a telephone or email-administered questionnaire. The outcome assessment can be taken within + 1 week for the scheduled visit.
Day 90, Day 180.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Serious Adverse Events
Time Frame: During treatment, up to 30 days.
Assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (CTCAE).
During treatment, up to 30 days.
General and respiratory symptoms
Time Frame: Day 30, 90, Day 180.
Measured according to the COVIDmeter from Statens Serum Institut using a telephone or email-administered questionnaire. The outcome assessment can be taken within + 1 week for the scheduled visit.
Day 30, 90, Day 180.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Berit L. Heitmann, Professor, Ph.D, Research Unit for Dietary Studies at the Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospitals, Denmark

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 6, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 29, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 25, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 27, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 22, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on COVID-19

Clinical Trials on PEP flute

Subscribe