Comparing Basic Life Support Performance With Serious Game Based Module and Simulation Based Hands on Training

August 29, 2020 updated by: Emin Aksoy, Acibadem University

Comparing Basic Life Support Performance Data Acquired From Serious Game Based Module and Simulation Based Hands on Training Via Built in Sensors of Simulators

The aim of this study is creating this platform and investigating whether performance evaluation of BLS trainings would be more objective compared to conventional OSCE (Objective Structured Clinical Examination) exams, if these evaluations were carried out with the platform which is combining OSCE scoring criteria with sensor data retrieved from the simulator's sensors.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The participants of this study consisted of 25 volunteers among Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University students without prior knowledge of basic life support protocol. 11 Participants (44.0%) were male, 14 (56.0%) were female. The participants were informed about the study and signed consent forms before participating the study. After a brief introduction of the serious gaming module, the participants were asked to choose the self-test mode of the serious game module. The participants' number of attempts was not limited. Following serious game based training, the hands-on training module combining OSCE scoring criteria with sensor data retrieved from the simulator's sensors was used for hands-on performance evaluation. After familiarization with the system using self-training mode, the participants were asked to proceed the BLS Hands-on training app with the simulator under the supervision of the educator. The simulation sessions were also recorded in order to use these recordings for conventional OSCE (Objective Structured Clinical Examination) performance evaluation. Conventional OSCE score of each participant was obtained by watching the recorded sessions of BLS trainings.Spearman's rho correlation test was used for calculating the correlation between serious gaming, hands on training module with including sensor data from the simulator and OSCE scores.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

25

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Turkey
    • Non-US/Canada
      • Istanbul, Non-US/Canada, Turkey, 34758
        • Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University - CASE (Center of Advanced Simulation and Education)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 25 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The participants of this study consisted of 25 volunteers among Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University students without prior knowledge of basic life support protocol. 11 Participants (44.0%) were male, 14 (56.0%) were female. The mean age of the participants was 24,2 years.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Having no prior Basic Life Support Training

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having prior Basic Life Support Training

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
BLS Training Group (Students without prior BLS Training)
  1. After completing training mode of the serious game module, participants were asked to choose the self-test mode of the serious game module.
  2. the participants were asked to practice their hands-on skills in simulation center under the supervision of educators. After familiarization with the system using self-training mode, the participants were asked to proceed the BLS Hands-on training app with the simulator under the supervision of the educator.
  3. Conventional OSCE score of each participant was obtained by watching the recorded sessions of BLS trainings.
Other: Medical simulator (3B Scientific Lilly Pro) and Platform combining simulator sensor data with OSCE scores
Hands-on training app combining OSCE scoring criteria with sensor data retrieved from the simulator's sensors was used for hands-on performance evaluation.
Other Names:
  • Basic Life Support Serious Game Module

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Getting BLS(Basic Life Support Training) performance scores from serious gaming module, hands -on module with sensor data and OSCE exam on day 1.
Time Frame: One day
Serious gaming module, hands -on module with sensor data and OSCE exam had the same scoring criteria depending European Resuscitation Council Basic Life Support 2015 Algorithm. The scores were calculated over 100 points, whereas higher scores meant better scores. The participants were considered as successful, if at least 80 points out of 100 were obtained.
One day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Acibadem University

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mehmet Emin Aksoy, Ph.D., Acibadem University Case(center Of Advanced Simulation And Education)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 4, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 15, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

August 22, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 26, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

September 1, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 1, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ATADEK-2020/16

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in South Korea

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe