- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04570202
Health cAre woRkers exposeD to COVID-19 (HARD-COVID19)
Symptoms of Depression, Stress and Burnout, and Long-term Psychological Impact in Health Care Professionals Exposed to the Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 Outbreak (HARD-COVID-19 - Health cAre woRkers exposeD to covID-19)
Health care workers working in hospital or nursing home for elderly people involved in the coronavirus epidemic are facing several challenges such as direct exposure and involvement in the resolution of major public health emergencies, exposure to potentially fatal contamination, physical exhaustion, unadjusted work organizations, the unusual number of deaths among patients, colleagues and close relatives, and significant ethical challenges in decision-making.
Preliminary data suggests that frontline and lay professionals suffer from different types of psychological distress. These data highlight the importance of screening for psychological distress in response to the scale of the pandemic and the provision of targeted psychological interventions, such as Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR, desensitization and neuro-emotional integration by eye movements), to improve the psychological well-being of healthcare workers exposed to COVID-19.
This project is both a cohort study with the proposal of a randomized trial to evaluate an intervention adapted to the exceptional circumstances of the crisis. As such, it is designed as Trial(s) Within Cohort design (TWIC).
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Health care workers working in hospital or nursing home for elderly people involved in the coronavirus epidemic are facing several challenges such as direct exposure and involvement in the resolution of major public health emergencies, exposure to potentially fatal contamination, physical exhaustion, unadjusted work organizations, the unusual number of deaths among patients, colleagues and close relatives, and significant ethical challenges in decision-making. Preliminary data from China suggests that frontline and lay professionals suffer from different types of psychological distress. A study of the mental health of 230 frontline medical staff in the COVID-19 outbreak found a high prevalence of anxiety and stress disorder (up to 25%).
These data highlight the importance of screening for psychological distress in response to the scale of the pandemic and the provision of targeted psychological interventions, such as EMDR (desensitization and neuro-emotional integration by eye movements), to improve the psychological well-being of healthcare workers exposed to COVID-19. EMDR is a therapy which for nearly 30 years has demonstrated, through well-conducted international experimental studies with a high level of evidence including a recent meta-analysis from 2019, its effectiveness in the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder and depression. Its use is recommended by the French National Authority for Health and the World Health Organization. In France, more than 1,700 therapists practice it. While the evidence for the effectiveness of EMDR is strong and its feasibility adapted to a crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic, its use has not been evaluated at the population level in the context of an exceptional health crisis.
This project is both a cohort study with the proposal of a randomized trial to evaluate an intervention adapted to the exceptional circumstances of the crisis. As such, it is designed as Trial(s) Within Cohort design (TWIC).
In addition, this project is also built to allow health professionals involved in the fight against COVID-19 to have regular access to self-administered screening with immediate feedback concerning the most frequent psychological symptoms, this method of screening and monitoring psychological distress in the context of a pandemic is not currently implemented in France.
The objectives of the study are as follows:
/ Create a cohort of French hospital health-care workers and French health professionals working in nursing home for elderly people involved in the care of COVID-19 patients in which we will:
- offer a self-administered mass screening test for common psychiatric disorders likely to occur in this context, and estimate the frequency of occurrence of common psychological symptoms in the short and long term (depression, burnout, post-traumatic stress);
- estimate the evolution over a year of the aforementioned symptoms and try to explain these trajectories.
- / To evaluate, in a randomized controlled trial, the effectiveness of 12 sessions of a specific therapeutic intervention combining "EMDR + usual care" compared to "usual care" alone in eligible participants (those screened positive for psychological symptoms) .
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Tours, France, 37044 cedex 9
- Bretonneau Regional Universitary Hospital
-
-
Centre Val De Loire
-
Tours, Centre Val De Loire, France, 37044
- Centre Investigation Clinique 1415
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria in the cohort:
- ≥ 18 years of age.
- French speaking.
- Health care workers: physicians, residents in medicine or pharmacy, dentist residents, nurses, auxiliary nurses, pharmacist, dentist, midwife, physiotherapists, radiographers, ambulance attendants, hospital porters, medical students, pharmacy students, dentist students, midwife students, nursing students, auxiliary nursing students, physiotherapist students, radiographer students.
- Working in metropolitan French public or private hospitals or in nursing home for elderly people (in French: "Etablissements d'Hébergement pour Personnes Agées Dépendantes" (EHPAD)).
- Have taken care of patients with COVID-19.
- Participants covered by or entitled to social security.
- Written informed consent obtained from the participant.
- Ability for participant to comply with the requirements of the study.
Inclusion criteria in the EMDR trial:
- Participant involved in the cohort study.
- Participant who are screened positive for PTSD (≥ 40 on PCL-5), depression (≥ 15 on PHQ-9), or on one of the burnout dimensions (≤ 22 on compassion satisfaction dimension, ≥ 42 on burnout dimension, or ≥ 42 on compassion fatigue dimension, as measured using the ProQOL) at M0 or M3 or M6.
Exclusion Criteria in the cohort:
- none
Exclusion criteria in the EMDR trial:
- none
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Usual Care
Subject from this group are screened positive for psychological distress but they will only receive standard of care.
|
|
|
Experimental: Eye Movement Desensitization & Reprocessing Group
Subject from this group are screened positive for psychological distress.
They will receive 12 sessions of Eye Movement Desensitization & Reprocessing therapy by a trained therapist over three months in addition to standard of care.
|
The EMDR therapy is organized in eight different phases, requiring attending multiple sessions, usually 12 separate sessions.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Efficacy on symptoms of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
Time Frame: From inclusion to 6 months after inclusion
|
This study is investigating three different conditions (PTSD, Depression and Burnout) each assessed with its own primary endpoint. Thus, the trial will have three primary endpoints. Change over a 6 months period in symptoms of PTSD measured by the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist Scale for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of mental disorders fifth edition ((DSM-5), PCL-5). The PCL-5 score is on a scale from 0 to 80. The higher the score, the higher the level of PTSD symptoms are. |
From inclusion to 6 months after inclusion
|
|
Efficacy on symptoms of Burnout
Time Frame: From inclusion to 6 months after inclusion
|
Change over a 6 months period in symptoms of Burnout measured by the Professional Quality Of Life questionnaire (ProQOL).
The ProQOL score is on a scale from 30 to 150.
The higher the score, the higher the level of Burnout symptoms are.
|
From inclusion to 6 months after inclusion
|
|
Efficacy on symptoms of Depression
Time Frame: From inclusion to 6 months after inclusion
|
Change over a 6 months period in symptoms of depression measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9).
The PHQ-9 score is on a scale from 0 to 27.
The higher the score, the higher the level of depression symptoms are.
|
From inclusion to 6 months after inclusion
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Short-term efficacy on symptoms of PTSD
Time Frame: From inclusion to 3 months after inclusion
|
Change over a 3 months period in symptoms of PTSD measured by the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist Scale for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of mental disorders fifth edition ((DSM-5), PCL-5).
The PCL-5 score is on a scale from 0 to 80.
The higher the score, the higher the level of PTSD symptoms are.
|
From inclusion to 3 months after inclusion
|
|
Short-term efficacy on symptoms of Burnout
Time Frame: From inclusion to 3 months after inclusion
|
Change over a 3 months period in symptoms of Burnout measured by the Professional Quality Of Life questionnaire (ProQOL).
The ProQOL score is on a scale from 30 to 150.
The higher the score, the higher the level of Burnout symptoms are.
|
From inclusion to 3 months after inclusion
|
|
Short-term efficacy on symptoms of Depression
Time Frame: From inclusion to 3 months after inclusion
|
Change over a 3 months period in symptoms of depression measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9).
The PHQ-9 score is on a scale from 0 to 27.
The higher the score, the higher the level of depression symptoms are.
|
From inclusion to 3 months after inclusion
|
|
Long-term efficacy on symptoms of PTSD
Time Frame: From inclusion to 12 months after inclusion
|
Change over a 12 months period in symptoms of PTSD measured by the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist Scale for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of mental disorders fifth edition ((DSM-5), PCL-5) for the participants who will be enrolled in the trial at M0 of the cohort.
The PCL-5 score is on a scale from 0 to 80.
The higher the score, the higher the level of PTSD symptoms are.
|
From inclusion to 12 months after inclusion
|
|
Long-term efficacy on symptoms of Burnout
Time Frame: From inclusion to 12 months after inclusion
|
Change over a 12 months period in symptoms of Burnout measured by the Professional Quality Of Life questionnaire (ProQOL) for the participants who will be enrolled in the trial at M0 of the cohort.
The ProQOL score is on a scale from 30 to 150.
The higher the score, the higher the level of Burnout symptoms are.
|
From inclusion to 12 months after inclusion
|
|
Long-term efficacy on symptoms of Depression
Time Frame: From inclusion to 12 months after inclusion
|
Change over a 12 months period in symptoms of depression measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) for the participants who will be enrolled in the trial at M0 of the cohort.
The PHQ-9 score is on a scale from 0 to 27.
The higher the score, the higher the level of depression symptoms are.
|
From inclusion to 12 months after inclusion
|
|
Efficacy on symptoms of Anxiety
Time Frame: From inclusion to 6 months after inclusion
|
Change over a 6 months period in anxiety measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 questionnaire (GAD-7).
The GAD-7 score is on a scale from 0 to 21.
The higher the score, the higher the level of anxiety symptoms are.
|
From inclusion to 6 months after inclusion
|
|
Long-term efficacy on symptoms of Anxiety
Time Frame: From inclusion to 12 months after inclusion
|
Change over a 12 months period in anxiety measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 questionnaire (GAD-7) for the participants who will be enrolled in the trial at M0 of the cohort.
The GAD-7 score is on a scale from 0 to 21.
The higher the score, the higher the level of anxiety symptoms are.
|
From inclusion to 12 months after inclusion
|
|
Efficacy on suicide attempts
Time Frame: From inclusion to 6 months after inclusion
|
Number of suicide attempts over a 6-month period from baseline
|
From inclusion to 6 months after inclusion
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Efficacy on suicidal ideation
Time Frame: From inclusion to 6 months after inclusion
|
Changes in the level of suicidal ideation over a 6 months period from baseline measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
The VAS is on a scale from 0 to 10.
The higher the VAS score, the higher suicidal ideation level is.
|
From inclusion to 6 months after inclusion
|
|
Long-term efficacy on suicidal ideation
Time Frame: From inclusion to 12 months after inclusion
|
Changes in the level of suicidal ideation over a 12 months period from baseline measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for the participants who are enrolled in the trial at M0 of the cohort.
The VAS is on a scale from 0 to 10.
The higher the VAS score, the higher suicidal ideation level is.
|
From inclusion to 12 months after inclusion
|
|
Efficacy on the impact of health on functioning: Role Emotional
Time Frame: From inclusion to 6 months after inclusion
|
Change in the impact of health on functioning (Role Emotional (RE) subdomain of the MOS Short Form-36 health survey v1.3 (SF-36)) over a 6 months period from baseline.
The RE score is on a scale from 0 to 100.
The higher the score, the better Role Emotional is.
|
From inclusion to 6 months after inclusion
|
|
Long-term efficacy on the impact of health on functioning: Role Emotional
Time Frame: From inclusion to 12 months after inclusion
|
Change in the impact of health on functioning (Role Emotional (RE) subdomain of the MOS Short Form-36 health survey v1.3 (SF-36)) over a 12 months period from baseline for the participants who are enrolled in the trial at M0 of the cohort.
The RE score is on a scale from 0 to 100.
The higher the score, the better Role Emotional is.
|
From inclusion to 12 months after inclusion
|
|
Efficacy on the impact of health on functioning: Role Physical
Time Frame: From inclusion to 6 months after inclusion
|
Change in the impact of health on functioning (Role Physical (RP) subdomain of the MOS Short Form-36 health survey v1.3 (SF-36)) over a 6 months period from baseline.
The RP score is on a scale from 0 to 100.
The higher the score, the better Role Physical is.
|
From inclusion to 6 months after inclusion
|
|
Long-term efficacy on the impact of health on functioning: Role Physical
Time Frame: From inclusion to 12 months after inclusion
|
Change in the impact of health on functioning (Role Physical (RP) subdomain of the MOS Short Form-36 health survey v1.3 (SF-36)) over a 12 months period from baseline for the participants who are enrolled in the trial at M0 of the cohort.
The RP score is on a scale from 0 to 100.
The higher the score, the better Role Physical is.
|
From inclusion to 12 months after inclusion
|
|
Substance use
Time Frame: From inclusion to 6 months after inclusion
|
Evolution of substance use over 6 months
|
From inclusion to 6 months after inclusion
|
|
Long-term substance use
Time Frame: From inclusion to 12 months after inclusion
|
Evolution of substance use over 12 months for the participants who are enrolled in the trial at M0 of the cohort
|
From inclusion to 12 months after inclusion
|
|
Medication use
Time Frame: From inclusion to 6 months after inclusion
|
Evolution of medication use over 6 months
|
From inclusion to 6 months after inclusion
|
|
Long-term medication use
Time Frame: From inclusion to 12 months after inclusion
|
Evolution of medication use over 12 months for the participants who are enrolled in the trial at M0 of the cohort
|
From inclusion to 12 months after inclusion
|
|
Health care utilization
Time Frame: From inclusion to 6 months after inclusion
|
Number of consultations of health professionals within the period of follow-up (general practitioner, psychiatrist, psychotherapist, psychologist, professionals who are practicing alternative medicines); Occurrence of EMDR therapy within the control group; Number of visits at the emergency unit of a hospital; Number of nights spent in hospital as a patient (short-term); Number of nights spent in rehabilitation facilities as a patient.
|
From inclusion to 6 months after inclusion
|
|
Long-term health care utilization
Time Frame: From inclusion to 12 months after inclusion
|
Number of consultations of health professionals within the period of follow-up (general practitioner, psychiatrist, psychotherapist, psychologist, professionals who are practicing alternative medicines); Occurrence of EMDR therapy within the control group; Number of visits at the emergency unit of a hospital; Number of nights spent in hospital as a patient (short-term); Number of nights spent in rehabilitation facilities as a patient.
For the participants who are enrolled in the trial at M0 of the cohort
|
From inclusion to 12 months after inclusion
|
|
Acceptability of EMDR in the EMDR group
Time Frame: From inclusion to 12 months after inclusion
|
Proportion of those who will be offered EMDR and will actually receive EMDR
|
From inclusion to 12 months after inclusion
|
|
Compliance in the EMDR group
Time Frame: From inclusion to 12 months after inclusion
|
Number of sessions attended over the total planned number
|
From inclusion to 12 months after inclusion
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Wissam EL-HAGE, MD-PhD, University hospital of Tours
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Behavioral Symptoms
- Mental Disorders
- Coronavirus Infections
- Coronaviridae Infections
- Nidovirales Infections
- RNA Virus Infections
- Virus Diseases
- Infections
- Respiratory Tract Infections
- Respiratory Tract Diseases
- Mood Disorders
- Pneumonia, Viral
- Pneumonia
- Lung Diseases
- Stress, Psychological
- Occupational Stress
- Occupational Diseases
- Trauma and Stressor Related Disorders
- Depression
- Depressive Disorder
- COVID-19
- Burnout, Professional
- Burnout, Psychological
- Stress Disorders, Traumatic
- Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic
Other Study ID Numbers
- DR200160-HARD-COVID-19
- 2020-A01642-37 (Registry Identifier: ID-RCB)
- 1-20-046 ID 48680 (Other Identifier: CPP SOOM-1)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Depression
-
Massachusetts General HospitalRecruitingDepression | Depression - Major Depressive Disorder | Depression Chronic | Depression in Adults | Depression Disorders | Depression DisorderUnited States
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)Active, not recruitingDepression Moderate | Depression Mild | Depression, TeenUnited States
-
ProgenaBiomeWithdrawnDepression | Depression, Postpartum | Depression, Anxiety | Depression Moderate | Depression Severe | Clinical Depression | Depression in Remission | Depression, Endogenous | Depression ChronicUnited States
-
Sorlandet Hospital HFUniversity of Oslo; Karolinska Institutet; Australian Catholic University; Helse...RecruitingAnxiety | Anxiety Depression | Depression Anxiety Disorder | Depression - Major Depressive DisorderNorway
-
Lipocine Inc.CompletedDepression, Postpartum | Postnatal Depression | Peripartum Depression | Depression, Post-Partum | Postpartum Depression (PPD) | Post-Natal DepressionUnited States
-
Washington University School of MedicineCompletedTreatment Resistant Depression | Late Life Depression | Geriatric Depression | Refractory Depression | Therapy-Resistant DepressionUnited States, Canada
-
Kintsugi Mindful Wellness, Inc.Sonar Strategies; Vituity PsychiatryActive, not recruitingDepression | Depression Moderate | Depression Severe | Depression MildUnited States
-
Kintsugi Mindful Wellness, Inc.Sonar Strategies; Kolby Walker, DO; Brittany KimbleRecruitingDepression | Depression Moderate | Depression Severe | Depression MildUnited States
-
University of CincinnatiNational Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)RecruitingMild DepressionUnited States
-
University of MinnesotaCompletedDepression SymptomsUnited States
Clinical Trials on EMDR
-
Erasmus Medical CenterNot yet recruitingAnxiety and Fear
-
Lega Cancro TicinoRecruitingCancer | Psychological DistressSwitzerland
-
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam...RecruitingPain | Sickle Cell Disease | Pain, Chronic DiseaseNetherlands
-
Khushal Khan Khattak Univeristy, Karak, PakistanRecruitingMajor Depressive Disorder 1Pakistan
-
Medisch Spectrum TwenteLeiden University Medical Center; University of TwenteEnrolling by invitation
-
University of PisaCompletedObsessive-Compulsive Disorder | Post-traumatic Stress Disorder | Guilt | Adult ALL | Shame | DisgustItaly
-
Ciclo de MutaçãoSao Jose do Rio Preto Medical SchoolCompleted
-
Mersin UniversityCompleted
-
Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-ThionvilleUniversity of LorraineCompletedBreast Cancer | Eye Movement Desensitization and Processing | PsychoterapyFrance