- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04574011
Fluid Responsiveness in Spontaneously Ventilating Patient
Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness With Non-invasive Dynamic Parameters in Spontaneous Breathing Patients
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Knowing when to give fluids to the patient is very important in fluid therapy.It is appropriate to administer it to patients whose cardiac output will increase when the fluid is administered (a patient with fluid responsiveness). Appropriate fluid administration can hemodynamically stabilize the patient's condition and reduce unnecessary fluid administration, thereby reducing complications that occur when fluid is insufficient or excessive fluid is administered.
The most commonly used dynamic variables in clinical practice are pulse pressure variation (PPV), stroke volume variation (SVV), and systolic pressure variation that can be obtained by invasive arterial tube insertion. However, recently a non-invasive monitoring method is being used in more and more areas, and in many cases it is necessary to closely monitor the patient's hemodynamic status without mounting an arterial catheter. Therefore, if the variables measured by a non-invasive method can predict fluid responsiveness at a reliable level, it will be of great help in clinical practice.
According to previous studies, dynamic variables can relatively accurately predict fluid responsiveness only in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. However, in actual clinic, it is necessary to evaluate fluid reactivity even in patients who are not under mechanical positive pressure ventilation. Accurate fluid treatment should be performed during or after surgery under spinal anesthesia in the recovery room. In addition, there are cases in which dynamic variables must be monitored non-invasively in spontaneous breathing patients who do not undergo mechanical ventilation even in intensive care units.
It is clinically meaningful to predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneous breathing patients using such a non-invasive method of monitoring. However, there is limited data on how to evaluate fluid responsiveness in these patient groups. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate whether fluid responsiveness can be predicted in spontaneous breathing patients using non-invasive dynamic variables.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Youngwon Kim, M.D
- Phone Number: 82-2072-3283
- Email: youngwon.md@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
Jongro-gu
-
Seoul, Jongro-gu, Korea, Republic of, 03080
- Seoul National University Hospital
-
Contact:
- Youngwon Kim, M.D
- Phone Number: 82-2072-3283
- Email: youngwon.md@gmail.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- for patients undergoing surgery under actual spinal anesthesia whose estimated blood loss during surgery is moderate to high (e.g. total knee arthroplasty, total hip arthroplasty)
- Patients with a history of cerebrovascular disease
- Patients with a history of 1 or 2 vessel disease
- Left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) Patients with 30% or more and less than 55% of these patients
- Patients who need close hemodynamic monitoring during operation
- ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) physical status classification system I, II, III
- no difficulty in passive leg raising maneuver
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients unable to communicate
- Patients who cannot or have difficulty in PLR (passive leg raising) maneuver (patients who cause pain when performing PLR due to trauma of the lower extremities, patients with spine disease that causes pain during PLR, and patient applying splint due to a fracture of the lower extremity)
- Patients unable to attach the finger cuff of the ClearSight sytem to one of the fingers of both hands. (Patients applying a splint due to a fracture of both upper limbs, etc.)
- Patients unable to perform transthoracic ultrasound examination (multiple trauma patients with rib fracture, etc.)
- Patients having difficulty obtaining blood pressure waveforms through the ClearSight system due to poor peripheral vascular perfusion (uncontrolled diabetes patients, patients with peripheral vascular disease, etc.)
- Patients with arrhythmia with moderate or higher risk such as atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter
- Heart failure patients with less than 30% of the left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF) on echocardiography or patients with moderate to severe left ventricular wall motor dysfunction, or patients with cardiovascular disease of 3 vessel disease
- Other patients who are not appropriate to participate in the study as judged by the researcher
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Fluid challenge responder
If the ratio of the stroke volume change after passive leg raising is the same or larger than 10%, the patient is assigned to RESPONDER group.
|
Raise the patient's lower limb at a 45 degree angle while lying down
|
Experimental: Fluid challenge non-responder
If the ratio of the stroke volume change after passive leg raising is less than 10%, the patient is assigned to RESPONDER group.
|
Raise the patient's lower limb at a 45 degree angle while lying down
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
ClearSight PPV
Time Frame: before induction, 20 minutes
|
Pulse pressure variation measured by ClearSight System arterial waveform
|
before induction, 20 minutes
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
ClearSight SVV
Time Frame: before induction, 20 minutes
|
Stroke volume variation measured by ClearSight System
|
before induction, 20 minutes
|
normal ventilation △IVC (inferior vena cava) diameter
Time Frame: before induction, 20 minutes
|
△IVC diameter variation on normal ventilation
|
before induction, 20 minutes
|
augmented ventilation △IVC (inferior vena cava) diameter
Time Frame: before induction, 20 minutes
|
△IVC diameter variation on augmented ventilation
|
before induction, 20 minutes
|
normal ventilation △POP (pulse oximeter plethysmography)
Time Frame: before induction, 20 minutes
|
△POP on normal ventilation
|
before induction, 20 minutes
|
augmented ventilation △POP (pulse oximeter plethysmography)
Time Frame: before induction, 20 minutes
|
△POP on augmented ventilation
|
before induction, 20 minutes
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jintae Kim, M.D, SNUH
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Cecconi M, Monge Garcia MI, Gracia Romero M, Mellinghoff J, Caliandro F, Grounds RM, Rhodes A. The use of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in spontaneously breathing patients to assess dynamic arterial elastance and to predict arterial pressure response to fluid administration. Anesth Analg. 2015 Jan;120(1):76-84. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000442.
- Chaves RCF, Correa TD, Neto AS, Bravim BA, Cordioli RL, Moreira FT, Timenetsky KT, de Assuncao MSC. Assessment of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients: a systematic review of literature. Ann Intensive Care. 2018 Feb 9;8(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13613-018-0365-y.
- Cavallaro F, Sandroni C, Antonelli M. Functional hemodynamic monitoring and dynamic indices of fluid responsiveness. Minerva Anestesiol. 2008 Apr;74(4):123-35. Epub 2008 Jan 24.
- Drvar Z, Pavlek M, Drvar V, Tomasevic B, Baronica R, Peric M. [Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation are good predictors of fluid responsiveness in sepsis patients]. Acta Med Croatica. 2013 Dec;67(5):407-14. Croatian.
- Slagt C, Malagon I, Groeneveld AB. Systematic review of uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis to determine cardiac output and stroke volume variation. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Apr;112(4):626-37. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet429. Epub 2014 Jan 14.
- Vos JJ, Poterman M, Salm PP, Van Amsterdam K, Struys MM, Scheeren TW, Kalmar AF. Noninvasive pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation to predict fluid responsiveness at multiple thresholds: a prospective observational study. Can J Anaesth. 2015 Nov;62(11):1153-60. doi: 10.1007/s12630-015-0464-2. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
- Thiel SW, Kollef MH, Isakow W. Non-invasive stroke volume measurement and passive leg raising predict volume responsiveness in medical ICU patients: an observational cohort study. Crit Care. 2009;13(4):R111. doi: 10.1186/cc7955. Epub 2009 Jul 8.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- H-2010-013-1161
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Fluid Responsiveness
-
CHU de ReimsCompletedFluid Responsiveness | Preload ResponsivenessFrance
-
Bhumibol Adulyadej HospitalNot yet recruitingFluid Responsiveness
-
Erasme University HospitalUniversité Paris-Saclay-Assistance publique des hôpitaux de ParisCompleted
-
Yonsei UniversityCompletedFluid ResponsivenessKorea, Republic of
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine,...Unknown
-
Institute of Mountain Emergency MedicineDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Merano Hospital, ItalyCompleted
-
Radboud University Medical CenterUnknownFluid ResponsivenessNetherlands
-
Seoul National University HospitalNot yet recruitingAnesthesia | Fluid Responsiveness
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, AmiensRecruitingFluid Therapy | Pharmacodynamics | Fluid Responsiveness | Fluid Challenge | Intravenous FluidsFrance
-
Istanbul Saglik Bilimleri UniversityCompletedFluid Responsiveness | Intraoperative CareTurkey
Clinical Trials on Passive leg raising
-
Recep Tayyip Erdogan UniversityTurkish Society of Thoracic and Cardio-Vascular Anesthesia and Intensive...Not yet recruitingCardiovascular Diseases | Surgery | Hypotension | Hypotension During Surgery | Hypotension on InductionTurkey
-
Region MidtJylland DenmarkEdwards LifesciencesCompletedCardiovascular InsufficiencyDenmark
-
Augusta UniversityWithdrawn
-
Charles University, Czech RepublicUnknownSeptic Shock | Vein Collapsibility | Intravascular Doppler | Volume Responsiveness in Septic ShockCzechia
-
Tri-Service General HospitalCompletedTachycardia | HypotensionTaiwan
-
Institute of Mountain Emergency MedicineDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Merano Hospital, ItalyCompleted
-
Southeast University, ChinaZhongda HospitalCompleted
-
Fortis Hospital, IndiaUnknown
-
Medical Centre LeeuwardenCompleted
-
Hopital Antoine BeclereUnknownHemodynamic MonitoringFrance