Dysphagia and Dysphonia Outcomes in SARS CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection (DYADS Study) (DYADS)

June 26, 2025 updated by: Ekpemi Irune, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Dysphagia and Dysphonia Outcomes in SARS CoV-2 (COVID-19): A Prospective Observational Cohort Study.

This study examines the presence, severity and natural history of dysphagia and dysphonia in the post-extubation and severely unwell COVID-19 patient.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cambridge, United Kingdom, CB2 0QQ
        • Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 81 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients identified with dysphagia and dysphonia secondary to COVID19 infection. Specifically severely unwell patients and post-extubation patients.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have been diagnosed with a positive SARS CoV-2 test.
  • Patients who have been diagnosed with dysphonia and/or dysphagia following COVID 19 treatment.
  • Patients who require investigation and management for dysphonia and/or dysphagia following COVID 19 treatment.
  • Adult patients aged 18 years - 85 years.
  • Patients that meet threshold for referral to the joint MDT clinic following screening

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who cannot undertake the assessment for dysphonia and/or dysphagia.
  • Patients who are being managed with palliative intent.
  • Patients with pre-existing dysphonia and/or dysphagia not previously responding to therapy (pre-existing prior to COVID-19 diagnosis).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary endpoint is severity of dysphonia and dysphagia at the time of initial assessment t = day 0 (for ITU patients: Day 0 = 24 hours after extubation or decannulation).
Time Frame: t = day 0 (for ITU patients: Day 0 = 24 hours after extubation or decannulation).
Based on therapy outcome measures from FEES, VoiS
t = day 0 (for ITU patients: Day 0 = 24 hours after extubation or decannulation).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The severity of dysphonia and/or dysphagia over an initial 12 month period (at t = 14 days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months)
Time Frame: t = 14 days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
Clinical assessment including outcome measures, FEES and/or Videofluoroscopy
t = 14 days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
The severity of dysphonia and/or dysphagia at t = day 5, day 10, day 14, day 21 - For in-patients only.
Time Frame: t = day 5, day 10, day 14, day 21 - For in-patients only.
Clinical assessment including outcome measures, FEES and/or Videofluoroscopy
t = day 5, day 10, day 14, day 21 - For in-patients only.
Relationship between severity of dysphonia and/or dysphagia with grade of ARDS
Time Frame: t = day 0 and 9 months
Clinical assessment including outcome measures, FEES and/or Videofluoroscopy
t = day 0 and 9 months
Relationship between severity of dysphonia and/or dysphagia with length of intubation
Time Frame: t = day 0 and 9 months
Clinical assessment including outcome measures, FEES and/or Videofluoroscopy
t = day 0 and 9 months
Relationship between severity of dysphonia and/or dysphagia with duration of mechanical ventilation
Time Frame: t = day 0 and 9 months
Clinical assessment including outcome measures, FEES and/or Videofluoroscopy
t = day 0 and 9 months
Relationship between severity of dysphonia on quality of life using Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS) questionnaire over time at day 0, 1 month and 9 months.
Time Frame: t = day 0, 1 month and 9 months.
Questionnaire assessment: This is a 30-item validated quality of life tool that is also a self-reporting tool. It appraises the impact of the patient's abnormal voice from an emotional perspective, related physical symptoms and stratifies the impairment itself in context of day to day activities. VoiSS is currently the most psychometrically robust voice outcome measure. Each item is scored 0 - 4 on the frequency responses: never, occasionally, some of the time, most of the time, always. The total score of 120 measures general voice pathology which is made up of Impairment = maximum score of 60; Emotional = maximum score of 32; Physical = maximum score of 28
t = day 0, 1 month and 9 months.
Relationship between severity of dysphagia on quality of life using Dysphagia Handicap Index (DHI) questionnaire over time at day 0, 1 month and 9 months
Time Frame: t = day 0, 1 month and 9 months
Questionnaire assessment: This is a 25-item questionnaire assessing three domains: physical (9 items), functional (9 items), and emotional aspects (7 items) of the Quality of Life (QOL) in patients suffering with dysphagia. For each statement the patient checks if it applies to him/her all the time, some of the time or never. The suggested scores are 0, 2 and 4, respectively. Using this scoring system amounts to a DHI score range of 0 - 100. The higher the score, the worse the dysphagia related QOL. The patient is also asked to provide a rating of their own impression of the severity of the dysphagia experienced on a scale from 1 (normal) to 7 (severe problem).
t = day 0, 1 month and 9 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 15, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

January 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 10, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

October 14, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 29, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 26, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on Fibreoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES)

Subscribe