Assessment of Anterior Teeth Restored With Ultra-translucent Multilayer Zirconia vs Lithium Disilicate Laminate Veneers

October 21, 2020 updated by: Mahmoud abd alkarim ahmed, Cairo University

Clinical Assessment of Anterior Teeth Restored With Ultra-translucent Multilayer Zirconia Versus Lithium Disilicate Laminate Veneers (Randomized Clinical Trial)

The aim of the present study is to assess the clinical performance of multilayered translucent zirconia laminate veneers versus lithium disilicate laminate veneers in terms of modified USPHS criteria for assessment of dental restorations (retention, restoration integrity, color match and marginal adaptation)

Study Overview

Detailed Description

inferior mechanical properties of glass ceramics necessities the continuous development and modification for materials suitable for all clinical situations

multilayered translucent zirconia provides the advantages of high mechanical properties than all glass ceramic in addition to the improved translucency in the new generations.

Therefore, the purpose of the present study is to evaluate the clinical performance of newly introduced multilayered translucent zirconia as a monolithic laminate veneer in comparison with lithium disilicate laminate veneer to determine the clinical functional and structural integrity of the restoration

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

26

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • sufficient sound enamel thickness
  • Presence of one adjacent natural teeth that doesn't need laminate to compare shade
  • age range 20 to 40 years old
  • non smokers
  • diastema less than 2mm
  • tooth fracture not exceeding incisal one third
  • normal occlusion
  • vital teeth
  • healthy periodontal tissues

Exclusion Criteria:

  • -insufficient enamel thickness
  • restoration more than 40 % of tooth surface
  • parafunctional habits
  • deep discoloration
  • sever teeth rotation
  • edge to edge or deep bite
  • abnormal occlusion
  • bad oral hygiene

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Ultra-translucent multilayer zirconia
Ultra-translucent multilayer zirconia laminate veneer treatment
Ultra-translucent multilayer zirconia laminate veneer treatment
Experimental: Lithium disilicate
Lithium disilicate laminate veneer treatment
Lithium disilicate laminate veneer treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Retention
Time Frame: 12 months follow up period
assessment of restoration will be done for retention on the base of of modified USPHS criteria for assessment of dental restorations
12 months follow up period

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Restoration integrity
Time Frame: 12 months follow up period
assessment of restoration will be done for restoration integrity on the base of of modified USPHS criteria for assessment of dental restorations
12 months follow up period

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Color match
Time Frame: 12 months follow up period
assessment of restoration will be done for color match on the base of of modified USPHS criteria for assessment of dental restorations
12 months follow up period
Marginal adaptation
Time Frame: 12 months follow up period
assessment of restoration will be done for Marginal adaptation on the base of of modified USPHS criteria for assessment of dental restorations
12 months follow up period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

October 18, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 15, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 21, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

October 22, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 22, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 21, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Retention, Color Match, Marginal Adaptation and Restoration Integrity

Clinical Trials on Ultra-translucent multilayer zirconia

Subscribe