High Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (HD-tDCS) for Early Alzheimer's Disease (HD-tDCS)

July 9, 2025 updated by: WANG KAI, Anhui Medical University
To investigate the clinical effect neural mechanism of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation combined with cognitive training on early AD

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Upon meeting the inclusion criteria and providing informed consent, each participant will complete a series of cognitive assessments and tDCS at the hospital outpatient clinics or inpatient department. Participants were randomly allocated to anode tDCS group with cognitive training, anode tDCS group and the sham group. There are about 20 participants in each group. Participants were studied using a double-blind design. Study participants and all personnel responsible for the effects of the participants remained masked to allocated condition and allocation parameters. Only tDCS administrators had access to the randomization list; they had minimal contact with the participants, and no role in cognitive assessments. For the first 30 participants, allocation was decided by draw. For the subsequent 30 patients, allocation was according to computer generated random numbers. Each participant would be treated for 10 days in two weeks by HD-tDCS.

Before the tDCS, a series of cognitive assessments and neuropsychological tests were obtained by a trained investigator to assess baseline. Each assessment will involve a set of assessment tools, including Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and associative memory as the primary outcome measure and various other tasks and questionnaires to measure cognition(DS, Stroop test, VFT, SDMT), memory (AVLT, AMT, working memory test), emotion(HAMA-17, HAMD-14, eye-tracking technolodgy), executive function(SST, WSCT, GDT) and stimulation tolerability. All the tests are conducted in two days. The participants had receiving a magnetic resonance imaging scan in multi-modalities, and electroencephalography (EEG) record.

Evaluations were conducted one week after treatment and at the end of two weeks of treatment, as well as the Global Index of Safety to assess adverse events of the stimulation. Participants were instructed to focus their answers on the past 7/14 days. The participants had also receiving a battery measure of neuropsychological tests, magnetic resonance imaging scan in multi-modalities, and EEG record. All tests were instructed to finished within 24 hours after the last stimulation. One month and three months after the last stimulation, participants were interviewed to obtain the same assessment as before. They were instructed to focus their answers on the past months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Anhui
      • Hefei, Anhui, China, 230032

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject diagnosed with early Alzheimer's disease or related diseases according to NINCDS-ACDRADA criteria.
  • Subjects must have a MMSE score between 10 and 27,indicating mild cognitive impairment or dementia
  • CDR score ≤ 2
  • Subject under treatment by IAChE for at least 3 months.
  • psychotropic treatments are tolerated if they were administered and unchanged for at least 3 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • CDR > 2
  • Any history or clinical signs of other severe psychiatric illnesses (like major depression,psychosis or obsessive compulsive disorder).
  • History of head injury,stroke,or other neurologic disease.
  • Organic brain defects on T1 or T2 images.
  • History of seizures or unexplained loss of consciousness.
  • Implanted pacemaker,medication pump,vagal stimulator,deep brain stimulator.
  • Family history of medication refractory epilepsy.
  • History of substance abuse within the last 6 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Anodal tDCS with Cognitive training
Participants will receive anoale tDCS daily and cognitive training for two weeks
Computer-based cognitive training (CCT) is a potentially important tool for individuals at risk of dementia. This trial will employ a computerized multi-domain adaptive training program. This program and training model have been demonstrated to be effective and beneficial in patients with vascular cognitive impairment. In the CCT intervention group, participants will undergo 2 weeks of computerized, multi-domain, adaptive training. The training domains include processing speed, attention, perception, long-term memory, working memory, calculation, executive control, reasoning, and problem-solving. Task rigor varies across domains and determines task grouping. Participants are required to complete 30 minutes of daily training(one session each of six 5-minute tasks).
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation tool that alters cortical excitability and activity via application of weak direct currents.HD-tDCS was administered using the Soterix 1×1 tDCS Low-Intensity Stimulator and the Soterix 4×1 Adapter. The selection of the electrode montage was based on computational models generating simulated current topography using HD Explore, which demonstrated good current distribution in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). For left DLPFC stimulation, the anodal electrode was placed at the F3 position (using the International 10-20 EEG system), and the 4 return electrodes (cathodes) were placed at positions AFz, FCz, F7, and C5 (4-6 cm from the anode). The center position CZ was aligned with the vertex of the head. During anodal DLPFC stimulation, participants received stimulation at 2 mA for 30 minutes, including a 30-second ramp-up period at the start and a 30-second ramp-down period at the end.
Sham Comparator: Sham-Anode tDCS&Cognitive training
Participants will receive Cognitive training+Sham tDCS daily for two weeks
Computer-based cognitive training (CCT) is a potentially important tool for individuals at risk of dementia. This trial will employ a computerized multi-domain adaptive training program. This program and training model have been demonstrated to be effective and beneficial in patients with vascular cognitive impairment. In the CCT intervention group, participants will undergo 2 weeks of computerized, multi-domain, adaptive training. The training domains include processing speed, attention, perception, long-term memory, working memory, calculation, executive control, reasoning, and problem-solving. Task rigor varies across domains and determines task grouping. Participants are required to complete 30 minutes of daily training(one session each of six 5-minute tasks).
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation tool that alters cortical excitability and activity via application of weak direct currents.HD-tDCS was administered using the Soterix 1×1 tDCS Low-Intensity Stimulator and the Soterix 4×1 Adapter. The selection of the electrode montage was based on computational models generating simulated current topography using HD Explore, which demonstrated good current distribution in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). For left DLPFC stimulation, the anodal electrode was placed at the F3 position (using the International 10-20 EEG system), and the 4 return electrodes (cathodes) were placed at positions AFz, FCz, F7, and C5 (4-6 cm from the anode). The center position CZ was aligned with the vertex of the head. For sham stimulation, participants received only the initial 30-second ramp-up to 2 mA, after which stimulation was immediately terminated.
Active Comparator: Anodal tDCS without Cognitive training
Participants will receive anoale tDCS daily without cognitive training for two weeks
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation tool that alters cortical excitability and activity via application of weak direct currents.HD-tDCS was administered using the Soterix 1×1 tDCS Low-Intensity Stimulator and the Soterix 4×1 Adapter. The selection of the electrode montage was based on computational models generating simulated current topography using HD Explore, which demonstrated good current distribution in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). For left DLPFC stimulation, the anodal electrode was placed at the F3 position (using the International 10-20 EEG system), and the 4 return electrodes (cathodes) were placed at positions AFz, FCz, F7, and C5 (4-6 cm from the anode). The center position CZ was aligned with the vertex of the head. During anodal DLPFC stimulation, participants received stimulation at 2 mA for 30 minutes, including a 30-second ramp-up period at the start and a 30-second ramp-down period at the end.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Memory improved assessed by Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog)
Time Frame: changes from baseline at 7,14 days and 4,12 weeks post-treatment
This is an very common clinical motor estimating scale. including orientation, language, structure, application of concepts, immediate recall of words and recognition of words, with a full score of 70. Higher scores indicate worse symptoms.
changes from baseline at 7,14 days and 4,12 weeks post-treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
special-version working memory
Time Frame: changes from baseline at 7,14 days and 4,12 weeks post-treatment
the accuracy and reaction time in working memory task
changes from baseline at 7,14 days and 4,12 weeks post-treatment
Associative Memory
Time Frame: changes from baseline at 7,14 days and 4,12 weeks post-treatment
The changes in Associative Memory will constitute the major research outcome measure used to assess response to HD-tDCS.
changes from baseline at 7,14 days and 4,12 weeks post-treatment
MMSE(Mini Mental State Examination)
Time Frame: changes from baseline at 7,14 days and 4,12 weeks post-treatment
The full name of MMSE is mini-mental state examination, and the scale consists of 30 subject, include the following seven aspects: time orientation, place orientation,immediate memory,attention and calculation,delay memory,language, visual space.One point is awarded for each question correctly answered during MMSE evaluation. If subject give the wrong answer or don't know answe he/she awarded 0 score, scope of scale score of 0 to 30 points. The higher the score, the better.
changes from baseline at 7,14 days and 4,12 weeks post-treatment
LMT (Logic Memory Test)
Time Frame: changes from baseline at 7,14 days and 4,12 weeks post-treatment
The changes in LMT will constitute the secondary research outcome
changes from baseline at 7,14 days and 4,12 weeks post-treatment

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
DST (Digital Span Test; Forward and Backward)
Time Frame: changes from baseline at 14 days and 4,12 weeks post-treatment
The changes in DST will constitute the other research outcome.
changes from baseline at 14 days and 4,12 weeks post-treatment
TMT (Trail Making Test)
Time Frame: changes from baseline at 14 days and 4,12 weeks post-treatment
The Trail Making Test (TMT) is divided into two parts, part A and part B. Part A requires the subject to connect 25 Numbers on the paper in sequence, and part B requires the subject to connect 25 Numbers of different colors alternately in sequence. The time it takes for the subject to complete all the Numbers is the subject's final score.
changes from baseline at 14 days and 4,12 weeks post-treatment
HAMD (Hamilton Depression Scale)
Time Frame: changes from baseline at 14 days and 4,12 weeks post-treatment
The changes in HAMD will constitute the other research outcome. The examination content consists of 17 questions (about 10 minutes), with a full score of 52. The higher the score, the more severe the depressive symptoms are.
changes from baseline at 14 days and 4,12 weeks post-treatment
HAMA (Hamilton Anxiety Scale)
Time Frame: changes from baseline at 14 days and 4,12 weeks post-treatment
The changes in HAMD will constitute the other research outcome. The examination content consists of 14 questions (about 10 minutes), with a full score of 56. The higher the score, the more severe the anxiety symptoms are.
changes from baseline at 14 days and 4,12 weeks post-treatment
NPI (Neuropsychiatric Inventory)
Time Frame: changes from baseline at 14 days and 4,12 weeks post-treatment
The changes in HAMD will constitute the other research outcome.
changes from baseline at 14 days and 4,12 weeks post-treatment
MRI measures
Time Frame: changes from baseline at 14 days and 4,12 weeks post-treatment
Multimodal magnetic resonance data were acquired, including structural phase magnetic resonance and rest state magnetic resonance.
changes from baseline at 14 days and 4,12 weeks post-treatment
changes in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Time Frame: changes from baseline at 14 days and 4,12 weeks post-treatment
MoCA was developed by Nasreddine et al. based on clinical experience and reference to the MMSE cognitive items and scores, and the final version was finalized in November 2004. We adopted a localized version (Mandarin version,includes 2 alternative versions) in line with the Chinese cultural background.It includes 11 inspection items in 8 cognitive fields, including visual structure skills, executive function, naming, attention and calculation, language, abstract thinking, memory, and orientation. With a total score of 30 or more than 26, it is normal. Anyone who has been education for less than 12 years will need to add one point to his final score.
changes from baseline at 14 days and 4,12 weeks post-treatment
GDS(Geriatric depression scale)
Time Frame: changes from baseline at 14 days and 4,12 weeks post-treatment
The Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) was created in 1982 by Brank et al. and is dedicated to screening for depression in the elderly. The most suitable feelings for the elderly in the past week were evaluated.There are 30 items in the scale, the total score is 30 points. The higher the score, the more obvious the depressive symptoms. It is generally considered that less than 10 points is normal.
changes from baseline at 14 days and 4,12 weeks post-treatment
JLOT(Judgment of line Judgment of line orientation test orientation test)
Time Frame: changes from baseline at 14 days and 4,12 weeks post-treatment
The JLOT test was determined by Benton et al. in 1994. There are two versions of H and V. The difference is that the order in which the pictures are presented is different. Each version contains 35 images, of which the official test consists of 30 images, and the other 5 images are for the participants to learn. The final score is the correct number of subjects to answer, the full score is 30 points, the higher the score, the better the space perception ability of the subject.
changes from baseline at 14 days and 4,12 weeks post-treatment
HVOT(Hooper visual organization test Hooper visual organization test)
Time Frame: changes from baseline at 14 days and 4,12 weeks post-treatment
The changes in HVOT(Hooper visual organization test Hooper visual organization test) will constitute assess response to rTMS the secondary research outcome measure.HVOT is a cognitive test used to evaluate the perceived structure of the subject. It consists of 30 items,and each question is 1 point and the total score is 30 points. The final score is the correct number of subjects to answer, the full score is 30 points, the higher the score, the better the space perception ability of the subject.
changes from baseline at 14 days and 4,12 weeks post-treatment
The Stroop color test
Time Frame: changes from baseline at 14 days and 4,12 weeks post-treatment
The Stroop color word test was developed by Stroop in 1935 and is used to evaluate the attention function of the subject. The subject is required to correctly read the target color on the stimulus card and record the completion time. The final completion time is the score of the participant. The shorter the time used, the better the performance of the subjects.
changes from baseline at 14 days and 4,12 weeks post-treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 18, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 18, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

October 23, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 9, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Early Alzheimer's Disease

Clinical Trials on computer-based cognitive training

Subscribe