- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04604158
Evaluating the Effect of a Mobile Audio Companion (Elly) to Reduce Anxiety in Cancer Patients
May 17, 2024 updated by: Gillian Gresham
IIT2020-13-GRESHAM-ELLY: Evaluating the Effect of a Mobile Audio Companion (Elly) to Reduce Anxiety in Cancer Patients
This is a single-arm, prospective, interventional study in cancer survivors and patients to examine the feasibility of a mobile health application, Elly (Elly Health Inc.), to reduce levels of anxiety, stress, loneliness, and social isolation.
Participants will be given access to the Elly phone application developed by Elly Health Inc. and will be asked to complete questionnaires measuring quality of life at multiple timepoints during the study.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
- Melanoma
- Sarcoma
- Neoplasms
- Lymphoma
- Kidney Cancer
- Leukemia
- Cancer
- Breast Cancer
- Head and Neck Cancer
- Gynecologic Cancer
- Glioblastoma
- Multiple Myeloma
- Stress
- Colorectal Cancer
- Anxiety
- Lung Cancer
- Prostate Cancer
- Bladder Cancer
- Loneliness
- Pancreas Cancer
- Cancer Metastatic
- Uterine Cancer
- Social Isolation
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
38
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90048
- Cedars Sinai Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of cancer of any type and currently receiving cancer-targeted treatment or have received cancer-targeted treatment within 6 months of consent date based on self-report. Cancer-targeted treatment includes chemotherapy, radiation therapy, hormonal therapy, biologic therapy, immunotherapy, and surgery.
- 18 years or older
- Access to and ability to use an iPhone (SE+, iOS 12.4+)
- Ability to understand and read English
- Have an understanding, ability, and willingness to fully comply with study procedures and restrictions
Exclusion Criteria:
- Hearing loss or vision impairment that would preclude the participant from accessing and using the app (use of hearing aids or visual aids is acceptable) based on self-report.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Elly Mobile Phone Application
|
The Elly mobile phone application delivers daily audio recording aimed at reducing anxiety, stress, loneliness, and social isolation.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Absolute change in patient-reported anxiety scores at Day 30 compared with baseline.
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Absolute change in patient-reported anxiety scores as measures using the NIH (National Institutes of Health) PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) questionnaire at Day 30 compared with baseline.
The minimum value is 6 and maximum value is 30, and a lower score means a better outcome.
|
30 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Absolute change in patient-reported anxiety scores at Day 14 compared with baseline.
Time Frame: 14 days
|
Absolute change in patient-reported anxiety scores as measures using the NIH (National Institutes of Health) PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) questionnaire at Day 14 compared with baseline.
The minimum value is 6 and maximum value is 30, and a lower score means a better outcome.
|
14 days
|
|
Absolute change in patient-reported anxiety scores at Day 60 compared with baseline.
Time Frame: 60 days
|
Absolute change in patient-reported anxiety scores as measures using the NIH (National Institutes of Health) PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) questionnaire at Day 60 compared with baseline.
The minimum value is 6 and maximum value is 30, and a lower score means a better outcome.
|
60 days
|
|
Absolute change in patient-reported anxiety scores at Day 90 compared with baseline.
Time Frame: 90 days
|
Absolute change in patient-reported anxiety scores as measures using the NIH (National Institutes of Health) PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) questionnaire at Day 90 compared with baseline.
The minimum value is 6 and maximum value is 30, and a lower score means a better outcome.
|
90 days
|
|
Absolute change in patient-reported anxiety scores at Day 120 compared with baseline.
Time Frame: 120 days
|
Absolute change in patient-reported anxiety scores as measures using the NIH (National Institutes of Health) PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) questionnaire at Day 120 compared with baseline.
The minimum value is 6 and maximum value is 30, and a lower score means a better outcome.
|
120 days
|
|
Absolute change in patient-reported anxiety scores at Day 150 compared with baseline.
Time Frame: 150 days
|
Absolute change in patient-reported anxiety scores as measures using the NIH (National Institutes of Health) PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) questionnaire at Day 150 compared with baseline.
The minimum value is 6 and maximum value is 30, and a lower score means a better outcome.
|
150 days
|
|
Absolute change in patient-reported anxiety scores at Day 180 compared with baseline.
Time Frame: 180 days
|
Absolute change in patient-reported anxiety scores as measures using the NIH (National Institutes of Health) PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) questionnaire at Day 180 compared with baseline.
The minimum value is 6 and maximum value is 30, and a lower score means a better outcome.
|
180 days
|
|
Absolute change in patient-reported depression scores at Day 30 compared with baseline.
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Absolute change in patient-reported depression scores as measures using the NIH (National Institutes of Health) PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) questionnaire at Day 30 compared with baseline.
The minimum value is 8 and maximum value is 40, and a lower score means a better outcome.
|
30 days
|
|
Absolute change in patient-reported depression scores at Day 60 compared with baseline.
Time Frame: 60 days
|
Absolute change in patient-reported depression scores as measures using the NIH (National Institutes of Health) PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) questionnaire at Day 60 compared with baseline.
The minimum value is 8 and maximum value is 40, and a lower score means a better outcome.
|
60 days
|
|
Absolute change in patient-reported depression scores at Day 90 compared with baseline.
Time Frame: 90 days
|
Absolute change in patient-reported depression scores as measures using the NIH (National Institutes of Health) PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) questionnaire at Day 90 compared with baseline.
The minimum value is 8 and maximum value is 40, and a lower score means a better outcome.
|
90 days
|
|
Absolute change in patient-reported depression scores at Day 120 compared with baseline.
Time Frame: 120 days
|
Absolute change in patient-reported depression scores as measures using the NIH (National Institutes of Health) PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) questionnaire at Day 120 compared with baseline.
The minimum value is 8 and maximum value is 40, and a lower score means a better outcome.
|
120 days
|
|
Absolute change in patient-reported depression scores at Day 150 compared with baseline.
Time Frame: 150 days
|
Absolute change in patient-reported depression scores as measures using the NIH (National Institutes of Health) PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) questionnaire at Day 150 compared with baseline.
The minimum value is 8 and maximum value is 40, and a lower score means a better outcome.
|
150 days
|
|
Absolute change in patient-reported depression scores at Day 180 compared with baseline.
Time Frame: 180 days
|
Absolute change in patient-reported depression scores as measures using the NIH (National Institutes of Health) PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) questionnaire at Day 180 compared with baseline.
The minimum value is 8 and maximum value is 40, and a lower score means a better outcome.
|
180 days
|
|
Absolute change in patient-reported loneliness scores at Day 30 compared with baseline.
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Absolute change in patient-reported loneliness scores as measures using the NIH (National Institutes of Health) PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) questionnaire at Day 30 compared with baseline.
The minimum value is 5 and maximum value is 25, and a lower score means a better outcome.
|
30 days
|
|
Absolute change in patient-reported loneliness scores at Day 60 compared with baseline.
Time Frame: 60 days
|
Absolute change in patient-reported loneliness scores as measures using the NIH (National Institutes of Health) PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) questionnaire at Day 60 compared with baseline.
The minimum value is 5 and maximum value is 25, and a lower score means a better outcome.
|
60 days
|
|
Absolute change in patient-reported loneliness scores at Day 90 compared with baseline.
Time Frame: 90 days
|
Absolute change in patient-reported loneliness scores as measures using the NIH (National Institutes of Health) PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) questionnaire at Day 90 compared with baseline.
The minimum value is 5 and maximum value is 25, and a lower score means a better outcome.
|
90 days
|
|
Absolute change in patient-reported loneliness scores at Day 120 compared with baseline.
Time Frame: 120 days
|
Absolute change in patient-reported loneliness scores as measures using the NIH (National Institutes of Health) PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) questionnaire at Day 120 compared with baseline.
The minimum value is 5 and maximum value is 25, and a lower score means a better outcome.
|
120 days
|
|
Absolute change in patient-reported loneliness scores at Day 150 compared with baseline.
Time Frame: 150 days
|
Absolute change in patient-reported loneliness scores as measures using the NIH (National Institutes of Health) PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) questionnaire at Day 150 compared with baseline.
The minimum value is 5 and maximum value is 25, and a lower score means a better outcome.
|
150 days
|
|
Absolute change in patient-reported loneliness scores at Day 180 compared with baseline.
Time Frame: 180 days
|
Absolute change in patient-reported loneliness scores as measures using the NIH (National Institutes of Health) PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) questionnaire at Day 180 compared with baseline.
The minimum value is 5 and maximum value is 25, and a lower score means a better outcome.
|
180 days
|
|
Absolute change in patient-reported social isolation scores at Day 30 compared with baseline.
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Absolute change in patient-reported social isolation scores as measures using the NIH (National Institutes of Health) PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) questionnaire at Day 30 compared with baseline.
The minimum value is 4 and maximum value is 20, and a lower score means a better outcome.
|
30 days
|
|
Absolute change in patient-reported social isolation scores at Day 60 compared with baseline.
Time Frame: 60 days
|
Absolute change in patient-reported social isolation scores as measures using the NIH (National Institutes of Health) PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) questionnaire at Day 60 compared with baseline.
The minimum value is 4 and maximum value is 20, and a lower score means a better outcome.
|
60 days
|
|
Absolute change in patient-reported social isolation scores at Day 90 compared with baseline.
Time Frame: 90 days
|
Absolute change in patient-reported social isolation scores as measures using the NIH (National Institutes of Health) PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) questionnaire at Day 90 compared with baseline.
The minimum value is 4 and maximum value is 20, and a lower score means a better outcome.
|
90 days
|
|
Absolute change in patient-reported social isolation scores at Day 120 compared with baseline.
Time Frame: 120 days
|
Absolute change in patient-reported social isolation scores as measures using the NIH (National Institutes of Health) PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) questionnaire at Day 120 compared with baseline.
The minimum value is 4 and maximum value is 20, and a lower score means a better outcome.
|
120 days
|
|
Absolute change in patient-reported social isolation scores at Day 150 compared with baseline.
Time Frame: 150 days
|
Absolute change in patient-reported social isolation scores as measures using the NIH (National Institutes of Health) PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) questionnaire at Day 150 compared with baseline.
The minimum value is 4 and maximum value is 20, and a lower score means a better outcome.
|
150 days
|
|
Absolute change in patient-reported social isolation scores at Day 180 compared with baseline.
Time Frame: 180 days
|
Absolute change in patient-reported social isolation scores as measures using the NIH (National Institutes of Health) PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) questionnaire at Day 180 compared with baseline.
The minimum value is 4 and maximum value is 20, and a lower score means a better outcome.
|
180 days
|
|
Frequency of Elly app use
Time Frame: 180 days
|
Frequency of study participant opening the Elly app
|
180 days
|
|
Participant's experience with Elly app at Day 14-30.
Time Frame: Day 30
|
Participant's experience with Elly app based on qualitative interview done between Day 14-30.
|
Day 30
|
|
Participant's experience with Elly app at Day 180-360.
Time Frame: Day 360
|
Participant's experience with Elly app based on qualitative interview done between Day 180-360.
|
Day 360
|
|
Elly app login amount (frequency and duration)
Time Frame: 180 days
|
Number of logins to Elly app by study participant
|
180 days
|
|
Feasibility
Time Frame: 180 days
|
Download of Elly app and engage with app at least 40% 3 or more times over study period.
|
180 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Gillian Gresham, PhD, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
December 2, 2020
Primary Completion (Actual)
May 17, 2024
Study Completion (Actual)
May 17, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 21, 2020
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 21, 2020
First Posted (Actual)
October 27, 2020
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
May 21, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 17, 2024
Last Verified
May 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Mental Disorders
- Digestive System Diseases
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Vascular Diseases
- Immune System Diseases
- Neoplasms by Histologic Type
- Neoplasms
- Lymphoproliferative Disorders
- Immunoproliferative Disorders
- Urologic Neoplasms
- Urogenital Neoplasms
- Neoplasms by Site
- Kidney Diseases
- Urologic Diseases
- Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial
- Genital Neoplasms, Female
- Uterine Diseases
- Endocrine System Diseases
- Hematologic Diseases
- Digestive System Neoplasms
- Endocrine Gland Neoplasms
- Hemorrhagic Disorders
- Astrocytoma
- Glioma
- Neoplasms, Neuroepithelial
- Neuroectodermal Tumors
- Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal
- Neoplasms, Nerve Tissue
- Hemostatic Disorders
- Paraproteinemias
- Blood Protein Disorders
- Neoplasms, Plasma Cell
- Pancreatic Diseases
- Female Urogenital Diseases
- Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
- Urogenital Diseases
- Male Urogenital Diseases
- Genital Diseases
- Genital Diseases, Female
- Kidney Neoplasms
- Glioblastoma
- Multiple Myeloma
- Anxiety Disorders
- Pancreatic Neoplasms
- Uterine Neoplasms
Other Study ID Numbers
- IIT2020-13-GRESHAM-ELLY
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Melanoma
-
University of Southern CaliforniaNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedRecurrent Melanoma | Stage IV Melanoma | Mucosal Melanoma | Ciliary Body and Choroid Melanoma, Medium/Large Size | Ciliary Body and Choroid Melanoma, Small Size | Iris Melanoma | Metastatic Intraocular Melanoma | Recurrent Intraocular Melanoma | Stage IV Intraocular Melanoma | Stage IIIA Melanoma | Stage... and other conditionsUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingMucosal Melanoma | Anal Melanoma | Bladder Melanoma | Cervical Melanoma | Esophageal Melanoma | Gallbladder Melanoma | Oral Cavity Mucosal Melanoma | Penile Mucosal Melanoma | Rectal Melanoma | Recurrent Mucosal Melanoma | Sinonasal Mucosal Melanoma | Urethral Melanoma | Vaginal Melanoma | Vulvar Melanoma | Head and... and other conditionsUnited States, Canada
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedRecurrent Melanoma | Stage IIIA Melanoma | Stage IIIB Melanoma | Stage IIIC Melanoma | Stage IIB Melanoma | Stage IIC Melanoma | Stage IA Melanoma | Stage IB Melanoma | Stage IIA MelanomaUnited States
-
Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyNational Cancer Institute (NCI); University of VirginiaCompletedStage IIIB Skin Melanoma | Stage IIIC Skin Melanoma | Stage III Skin Melanoma | Stage IIA Skin Melanoma | Stage IIB Skin Melanoma | Stage IIC Skin Melanoma | Stage IIIA Skin Melanoma | Stage IA Skin Melanoma | Stage IB Skin Melanoma | Stage 0 Skin Melanoma | Stage I Skin Melanoma | Stage II Skin MelanomaUnited States
-
MelanomaPRO, RussiaRecruitingMelanoma | Melanoma (Skin) | Melanoma Stage IV | Melanoma Stage III | Melanoma, Stage II | Melanoma, Uveal | Melanoma in Situ | Melanoma, OcularRussian Federation
-
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research InstituteTurnstone Biologics, Corp.CompletedMetastatic Melanoma | Conjunctival Melanoma | Ocular Melanoma | Unresectable Melanoma | Uveal Melanoma | Cutaneous Melanoma | Mucosal Melanoma | Iris Melanoma | Acral Melanoma | Non-Cutaneous MelanomaUnited States
-
Fudan UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Roswell Park Cancer InstituteNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedStage IV Skin Melanoma | Recurrent Melanoma | Stage IIIB Skin Melanoma | Stage IIIC Skin Melanoma | Stage IIA Skin Melanoma | Stage IIB Skin Melanoma | Stage IIC Skin Melanoma | Stage IIIA Skin Melanoma | Stage IA Skin Melanoma | Stage IB Skin MelanomaUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedStage IV Skin Melanoma | Recurrent Melanoma | Stage IIIB Skin Melanoma | Stage IIIC Skin Melanoma | Stage IIA Skin Melanoma | Stage IIB Skin Melanoma | Stage IIC Skin Melanoma | Stage IIIA Skin Melanoma | Stage IA Skin Melanoma | Stage IB Skin MelanomaUnited States
-
Mayo ClinicNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedRecurrent Melanoma | Stage IV Melanoma | Stage IIIA Melanoma | Stage IIIB Melanoma | Stage IIIC Melanoma | Stage IIB Melanoma | Stage IIC Melanoma | Stage IIA MelanomaUnited States
Clinical Trials on Elly Mobile Phone Application
-
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical CenterCompleted
-
MelanomaPRO, RussiaPrivolzhsky Research Medical UniversityRecruitingNevus | Nevus, Pigmented | Melanoma (Skin) | Basal Cell Carcinoma | Squamous Cell Carcinoma | Bowen's Disease | Nevus, Spitz | Melanoma in Situ | Nevus Halo | Spot PigmentedRussian Federation
-
Northwestern UniversityNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)WithdrawnDepressive Symptoms | Anxiety GeneralizedUnited States
-
Anjali Raja BeharelleMediService AGCompletedHypertension | Medication AdherenceSwitzerland
-
Collabree AGUniversity Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandCompletedHypertension | Medication AdherenceSwitzerland
-
Mbarara University of Science and TechnologyCompletedmHealth | Maternal Health | MultimediaUganda
-
University of MichiganBlue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan FoundationCompletedDiabetes Mellitus | Prediabetic StateUnited States
-
General Health Council, MexicoEli Lilly and Company; Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales de los Trabajadores...RecruitingDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Mexico
-
Chulalongkorn UniversityThai Red Cross AIDS Research Centre; International AIDS SocietyCompletedHIV Prevention | Adherence, Medication | Adolescent Behavior | Mobile Health | Sexual HealthThailand
-
Baylor College of MedicineU.S. National Science FoundationRecruitingDiabetes Prevention | Obesity and Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2United States