Selective Avoidance of Nodal VolumEs at Minimal Risk (GCC 20110) (SAVER)

July 24, 2025 updated by: Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland, Baltimore

A Single-arm, Single-stage Phase II Trial of Selective Avoidance of Nodal VolumEs at Minimal Risk (SAVER) in the Contralateral Neck of Patients With p16-positive Oropharynx Cancer

This is a phase II, non-randomized, therapeutic trial with the primary objective to determine the efficacy of reduced contralateral (C/L) elective nodal treatment volumes in preventing C/L recurrences at 2 years in patients with p16 positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing definitive or adjuvant RT.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients with human papillomavirus (HPV) or its surrogate marker p16, positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (p16+OPSCC) exhibit favorable overall survival (OS) rates of 70-100% at 3 years. These outcomes are dependent on disease burden and patient characteristics and independent of treatment modality. Significant treatment related side effects exist despite advances in radiotherapy (RT) technology, surgical techniques, and supportive care. In addition to common acute toxicities, the favorable OS of patients with p16+OPSCC potentially places them at increased risk for developing long-term treatment-induced side-effects. Therefore, it is important to establish novel management approaches that maintain excellent current clinical outcomes while effectively reducing acute and long-term side effects.

One such approach of limiting RT-induced toxicity is to decrease the amount of normal tissue that receives radiation through judicious reduction of RT treatment volumes. Treatment of elective nodal volumes increases dose to numerous organs at risk (OARs). Patients with well-lateralized tonsil tumors and limited neck disease can effectively be treated with ipsilateral nodal radiotherapy. However, based on recent phase III trials, contralateral (C/L) elective nodal radiation is performed for the majority of patients with p16+OPSCC increasing acute and long-term toxicities. Therefore, judicious data-driven approaches for decreasing the number of elective ipsilateral and contralateral nodal levels treated is necessary to limit RT-induced side effects. This protocol tests the hypothesis that treating only the high-risk sub-volumes of levels II and III would be effective in maintaining regional control in the elective neck while decreasing xerostomia (dry mouth) and dysphagia (swallowing difficulties).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

52

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21201
        • University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21201
        • Maryland Proton Treatment Center
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21201
        • UMMC
      • Bel Air, Maryland, United States, 21014
        • Upper Chesapeake Health
      • Columbia, Maryland, United States, 21044
        • Central Maryland Radiation Oncology
      • Glen Burnie, Maryland, United States, 21061
        • Baltimore Washington Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Is there pathologically (histologically or cytologically) proven diagnosis of p16+ squamous cell carcinoma (including the histological variants papillary squamous cell carcinoma and basaloid squamous cell carcinoma) of the oropharynx (tonsil or base of tongue)? Note: Cytologic diagnosis from a cervical lymph node (from a paraffin block, not from smears) is sufficient in the presence of clinical evidence of a primary tumor in the oropharynx. Clinical evidence should be documented, may consist of palpation, imaging, or endoscopic evaluation, and should be sufficient to estimate the size of the primary (for T stage).
  2. Does the patient require elective contralateral radiotherapy in the definitive or adjuvant setting (i.e. base of tongue primary or tonsil with base of tongue invasion, soft palate invasion, or medialized as defined by > 1/3 of the distance from the tonsil to the midline of the soft palate?
  3. Does the patient have clinical stage T1-4, N0, N1 or N3, and M0 disease (AJCC 8th edition) as defined by physical examination and appropriate imaging (PET/CT preferred, CT neck with IV contrast with CT chest without contrast as recommended alternative to PET/CT)?
  4. Was a general history and physical examination performed by a radiation oncologist, medical oncologist, or head and neck surgeon within 60 days prior to registration?
  5. Was the patient's Zubrod Performance Status 0-1 within 30 days prior to registration?
  6. Is the patient ≥ 18 years of age?
  7. For women of childbearing potential, was a serum pregnancy test completed within 2 weeks of initiation or radiotherapy?
  8. If yes, was the serum pregnancy test negative?
  9. If a woman of child-bearing potential or sexually active male, is the patient willing to use effective contraception throughout their participation in the treatment phase of the study and at least 180 days following the last study treatment.
  10. Did the patient provide study specific informed consent prior to study entry, including consent for mandatory submission of tissue for required p16 review?

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Does the patient have cancer considered to be from an oral cavity site (oral tongue, floor mouth, alveolar ridge, buccal or lip), nasopharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx?
  2. Does the patient have a carcinoma of the neck of unknown primary origin?
  3. Does the patient have distant metastasis?
  4. Does the patient have prior invasive malignancy (except non-melanomatous skin cancer) unless disease free for a minimum of 3 years?
  5. Did the patient have prior systemic chemotherapy for the study cancer (prior chemotherapy for a different cancer is allowable)?
  6. Did the patient have prior radiotherapy to the region of the study cancer that would result in overlap of radiation therapy fields?
  7. Did the patient have prior surgery of the head and neck excluding superficial removal of cutaneous skin malignancies?
  8. Is the patient homeless?
  9. Does the patient have an active drug or alcohol dependency?
  10. Is the patient pregnant or nursing (an exception will be made for nursing patients that are not receiving chemotherapy)?
  11. Radiographic evidence of contralateral nodal disease as described below. 1) Max standardized uptake value (SUV) greater than 3.0, or 2) Short-axis diameter is > 1.5 cm for level II nodes, > 0.8 cm for retropharyngeal node, or > 1.0 cm for level III, IV, or V, or 3) Central necrosis or heterogeneous enhancement

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Reduced C/L elective nodal volume
All patients will receive the reduced C/L elective nodal volume as described. Treatment will be delivered via IMRT/VMAT or PBPT.
Delivered over 6 weeks in 30 daily fractions in the adjuvant setting and over 6.5 weeks in 33 daily fractions in the definitive setting. In the adjuvant setting, areas with positive surgical margins or nodal stations with pathologic extranodal extension will receive 63 Gy. Margin negative resection bed and involved nodal stations without extranodal extension will receive 54 Gy. Low-risk elective nodal volumes (i.e. ceCTV) will receive 51 Gy. In the definitive setting, gross disease will receive 69.96 Gy, areas at high-risk for subclinical disease will receive 60 Gy, and areas at low-risk for harboring subclinical disease (i.e. ceCTV) will receive 52.8 Gy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Elective out-of-field contralateral nodal failure
Time Frame: 2-years following completion of radiotherapy
Time to failure will be calculated from the date of informed consent until the date of nodal failure in the untreated elective neck sub-volume.
2-years following completion of radiotherapy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Grade 2/3 xerostomia
Time Frame: 2-years following completion of radiotherapy
defined by PRO-CTCAE (patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurement system - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE))
2-years following completion of radiotherapy
Dysphagia using The M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)
Time Frame: 2-years following completion of radiotherapy
The M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory is a self-administered questionnaire designed specifically for evaluating the impact of dysphagia on the Quality of Life (QOL) of patients with head and neck cancer.
2-years following completion of radiotherapy
PEG-tube rate
Time Frame: 2-years following completion of radiotherapy
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG)-tube rate
2-years following completion of radiotherapy
Overall survival
Time Frame: 2-years following completion of radiotherapy
2-years following completion of radiotherapy
Progression-free survival
Time Frame: 2-years following completion of radiotherapy
2-years following completion of radiotherapy
Locoregional control
Time Frame: 2-years following completion of radiotherapy
2-years following completion of radiotherapy
Incidence of pulmonary metastases
Time Frame: 2-years following completion of radiotherapy
2-years following completion of radiotherapy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Matthew Witek, MD, University of Maryland/Maryland Proton Treatment Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 23, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 23, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

October 30, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 29, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Head and Neck Cancer

Clinical Trials on Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)/volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) or Pencil beam proton therapy (PBPT)

Subscribe