PREselection of Patients at Risk for COgnitive DEcline After Radiotherapy Using Advanced MRI

January 2, 2023 updated by: Maastricht Radiation Oncology

Meningioma are slow growing and frequently occurring intracranial tumors, responsible for 33% of all asymptomatic intracranial tumors and 13-26% of all symptomatic primary brain tumors. The 10-year survival rate is 72%. A variety of treatment options is available for symptomatic meningioma including surgical removal with or without radiotherapy or radiotherapy alone. These therapies can have negative impact on cerebral functioning.

After high dose radiotherapy for primary or metastatic brain tumors 50-90% of > 6 months' survivors develop irreversible disabling cognitive decline leading to premature loss of independence, reduced Quality of Life (QOL) as well as significant economic burden both at the individual as societal level. Especially for patients with a good prognosis like benign meningioma, maintaining neurocognitive function is crucial. Understanding the mechanisms underlying radiation induced cognitive decline is complex and which brain areas to spare are an important subject of research.

Evaluation methods to assess cognitive function and predict cognitive decline are urgently needed, this will allow the development of optimized treatment strategies with the aim to preserve or even improve cognitive function in meningioma patients. Improvements in the field of neuroimaging techniques (i.e. advanced MRI techniques) have the possibility to identify areas susceptible to cognitive impairment. This allows in the future a more personalized radiation treatment by identifying patients at risk, by optimizing the radiotherapy dose to specific brain regions, that could eventually reduce or prevent, cognitive decline. Improvements in the field of radiotherapy for example by higher precision treatment such proton therapy have potential in obtaining these more individualized strategies.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

67

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult (18 years or older) patients with meningioma tumours (WHO I) in a good clinical condition treated with curative intend using radiotherapy (proton or photon) without other known malignancies.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Meningioma WHO I, grading based on pathology or radiological features
  • Age ≥ 18 years.
  • Karnofsky Performance Score 70 or above.
  • Ability to comply with the protocol, including neuropsychological testing and imaging.
  • Ability to understand the requirements of the study and to give written informed consent, as determined by the treating physician.
  • Written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Resection meningioma < 3mnd
  • Age < 18 years
  • Pregnancy
  • Any prior cranial radiotherapy
  • Any prior chemotherapy in the last 5 years
  • Contra-indication for MR imaging (i.e. metal implants, claustrophobia)
  • Any other serious medical condition that could interfere with follow-up.
  • Severe aphasia or language barrier interfering with assessing endpoints (i.e. completion of questionnaires or neurocognitive performance)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation cognitive failure and radiotherapy dose
Time Frame: 2 years after radiotherapy
Correlation between the delta cognitive failure score (baseline vs 2 years) and radiotherapy dose in cognition related brain regions (supratentorial brain, hippocampus left/right and anterior/posterior, cerebellum anterior/posterior).
2 years after radiotherapy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation baseline imaging and patient specific parameters
Time Frame: 2 years after radiotherapy
Correlation between baseline imaging (advanced MRI sequence) and patient specific parameters (e.g. baseline cognitive status, age, Karnofsky index (KPS), co-morbidity, alcohol consumption, smoking, medication)
2 years after radiotherapy
RT induced cognitive change measured with extensive cognitive testing
Time Frame: 2 years after radiotherapy
RT-induced cognitive change measured with extensive cognitive testing
2 years after radiotherapy
Correlation advanced MRI and PROMS
Time Frame: 2 years after radiotherapy
Correlation of advanced MRI and treatment/dose parameters to PROMS; EQ/5D, QLQ/C30, QLQ/BN20, Cognitive Failure questionnaire (CFQ) , Multidimentional Fatigue Index (MVI/20)
2 years after radiotherapy
Radiation susceptibility of organs by Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP)
Time Frame: 2 years after radiotherapy
Identification of radiation susceptibility of individual anatomical and functional central nervous system (CNS) organs (e.g. (hippocampi, frontal lobe, cerebellum, brain) for radiation damage by relating dose-volume histogram of the organs with information with neurocognitive test results.
2 years after radiotherapy
Sensitivity neurocognitive tests
Time Frame: 2 years after radiotherapy
Sensitivity of additional extensive neurocognitive tests
2 years after radiotherapy
Correlation advanced MRI and radiotherapy modality
Time Frame: 2 years after radiotherapy
Correlation of advanced MRI and treatment/dose parameters and radiotherapy modality (photon vs proton)
2 years after radiotherapy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Danielle Eekers, Maastro Clinic, The Netherlands
  • Study Chair: Karen Zegers, Maastro Clinic, The Netherlands

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 8, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 8, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 8, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 5, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 20, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 4, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 2, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Meningioma

Clinical Trials on PRECODE-MRI

3
Subscribe