Paracetamol UNIFLASH for Buccal Use Phase III Trial in Acute Pain Due to a Tooth Extraction

November 10, 2022 updated by: Unither Pharmaceuticals, France

Comparison of the Analgesic Effect of a New Paracetamol Formulation (Paracetamol UNIFLASH) for Buccal Use and Two Different Doses of an Oral Paracetamol Form Controlled Versus Placebo in Patients Suffering From Moderate Pain Due to a Tooth Extraction.

This study aims to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of single dose of a new paracetamol formulation (paracetamol UNIFLASH) for buccal use in comparison to two different doses of an oral paracetamol form controlled versus placebo.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

407

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bordeaux, France, 33075
        • CHU de Bordeaux
      • Clermont Ferrand, France, 63003
        • CHRU de Clermont Ferrand
      • Colombes, France, 92700
        • Hopital Louis Mourier
      • Montpellier, France, 34070
        • CHU Montpellier
      • Strasbourg, France
        • CHU de Strasbourg
      • Milano, Italy
        • Universita degli Studi di Milano
      • Udine, Italy
        • Department of maxilla facial Surgery -University of Udine
      • Gdansk, Poland
        • University Central Stomatology GDANSK
      • Lodz, Poland, 92213
        • Oral Surgery Department, Central Clinical Hospital
      • Lodz, Poland
        • Dental practice
      • Lublin, Poland
        • Oral surgery Medical University of Lublin
      • Warszawa, Poland
        • AW Clinic
      • Wroclaw, Poland, 50425
        • NZOZ Akademicka Poliklinika Stomatologiczna
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08022
        • Centro Medico Teknon - Grupo Quironsalud
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Hospital Odontológico Universitat Barcelona
      • Granada, Spain
        • Facultad de Odontología de la Universidad de Granada
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Instituto Profesor Sada
      • Murcia, Spain, 30003
        • Faculty of Medicine of the UNIVERSITY OF MURCIA
      • Santiago de Compostela, Spain, 15706
        • Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago (CHUS)
      • Sevilla, Spain
        • Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and female patients aged from 18 years of age
  • Patients scheduled to undergo the removal of one third soft-tissue impacted or not-impacted mandibular molar (associated or not to an ipsilateral erupted maxillary molar) under short-acting local anaesthetic preoperatively;
  • Patients weighing > 50 kg;

Additional inclusion criteria

  • Patients experiencing a moderate pain within 4 hours after the dental extraction, defined by a baseline pain intensity Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) score ≥ 40 mm and ≤ 60 mm;
  • Third mandibular molar extraction completed without any immediate complication, that in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with the study conduct and/or assessments (e.g., suspected neurosensory complication, incomplete removal of tooth).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient who undergoes an extraction of contralateral molar in the same procedure or a bony-impacted molar;
  • Patients treated by analgesics or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) within the 3 days prior to the day of randomization (or within 5 times the elimination half-life whichever the longest);
  • Patient who received other analgesic than short-acting preoperative or intraoperative local anaesthetic agents within 12 hours before the start of the surgery or peri-operatively until randomization;
  • Patients with any known hypersensitivity to paracetamol, ibuprofen or ingredients contained in IMPs and Non-Investigational Medicinal Product (NIMP);

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Paracetamol UNIFLASH 125mg
1 sachet Paracetamol UNIFLASH 125mg + 2 placebo capsule
Oromucosal solution 1.25 mL for buccal use
Dummy treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
1 Placebo sachet + 2 placebo capsule
Dummy treatment
Active Comparator: Paracetamol 500mg
1 Placebo sachet + 1 placebo capsule + 1 capsule Panadol 500mg
Dummy treatment
Tablet masked in capsule
Active Comparator: Paracetamol 1000mg
1 Placebo sachet + 2 capsules Panadol 500mg
Dummy treatment
Tablet masked in capsule

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ranked Efficacy Endpoints: 1. Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID0-60min)
Time Frame: At 60 minutes
Pain Intensity Difference will be calculated using the scores of pain intensity assessed by the patient at defined time-points (T5, T10, T15, T20, T30, T45, T60 min) after the IMP intake and/or right before first intake of rescue medication using a 100-mm Visual Analogic Scale (0= no pain and 100= worst imaginable pain) compared to baseline
At 60 minutes
Onset of pain relief (versus 500 mg of the reference oral paracetamol (Panadol®)
Time Frame: At 60 minutes

Defined as the period for the patient to reach a meaningful pain relief during the first 60 min post-IMP intake.

After completion of the 5-point verbal rating scale (VRS) at T5, T10, T15, T20, T30, T45, T60 min post-IMP intake assessment time points, the patient will have to answer this question "Do you consider this level of pain relief as meaningful - Yes or No?"

At 60 minutes
Proportion of responder patients at 60 minutes (versus 500 mg of the reference oral paracetamol (Panadol®)).
Time Frame: At 60 minutes
A responder patient is defined as a subject who achieves a reduction of 50 % of pain intensity compared to baseline.
At 60 minutes
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) versus 1000 mg of the reference oral paracetamol (Panadol®)
Time Frame: At 60 minutes
At 60 minutes
Onset of pain relief (versus 1000 mg of the reference oral paracetamol (Panadol®)).
Time Frame: At 60 minutes

Defined as the period for the patient to reach a meaningful pain relief during the first 60 min post-IMP intake.

After completion of the a 5-point verbal rating scale at T5, T10, T15, T20, T30, T45, T60 min post-IMP intake assessment time points, the patient will have to answer this question "Do you consider this level of pain relief as meaningful - Yes or No?"

At 60 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sum of Pain Intensity Difference at 5 minutes (SPID0-5min), 10 minutes (SPID0-10min), 30 minutes (SPID0-30min), 45 minutes (SPID0-45min), 1 hour (SPID0-1h), 2 hours (SPID0-2h), 4 hours (SPID0-4h), and 6 hours (SPID0-6h).
Time Frame: At 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 30 minutes, 45 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, and 6 hours.
Pain Intensity Difference will be calculated using the score of pain intensity assessed by the patient at defined time-points (T5, T10, T15, T20, T30, T45, T90, T120, T180, T240, T300 and T360 min) after IMP intake or right before first intake of rescue medication using a 100-mm Visual Analogic Scale compared to baseline.
At 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 30 minutes, 45 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, and 6 hours.
Proportion of responders at 60 minutes (versus 1000 mg of the reference oral paracetamol (Panadol®)).
Time Frame: At 60 minutes
A responder patient is defined as a subject who achieves a reduction of 50 % of pain intensity compared to baseline.
At 60 minutes
Proportion of responders at 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 30 minutes, 45 minutes, 2 hours, 4 hours and then 6 hours.
Time Frame: At 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 30 minutes, 45 minutes, 2 hours, 4 hours and then 6 hours.
A responder patient is defined as a subject who achieves a reduction of 50 % of pain intensity compared to baseline at each time point of the study.
At 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 30 minutes, 45 minutes, 2 hours, 4 hours and then 6 hours.
Total Pain Relief at 1 hour (TOTPAR0-1h), 2 hours (TOTPAR0-2h), 4 hours (TOTPAR0-4h) and 6 hours (TOTPAR0-6h)
Time Frame: At 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours and 6 hours.
Pain relief (PAR) will be assessed by the patient at defined time points (T5, T10, T15, T20, T30, T45, T60, T90, T120, T180, T240, T300 and T360 min) after IMP intake and/or right before first intake of rescue medication using a 5-point verbal rating scale.
At 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours and 6 hours.
Period of time before taking rescue analgesic treatment intake.
Time Frame: Up to 24 hours after dose
Up to 24 hours after dose
Proportion of patients taking a rescue analgesic treatment.
Time Frame: At 6 hours
At 6 hours
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) versus 500 mg of the reference oral paracetamol (Panadol®)
Time Frame: At 60 minutes
At 60 minutes
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) versus 500 mg and 1000 mg of the reference oral paracetamol (Panadol®)
Time Frame: At 360 minutes
At 360 minutes

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Occurrence and severity of serious and non-serious Adverse Events (AEs).
Time Frame: Up to 24 hours after dose
Up to 24 hours after dose
The test volume formulation acceptability
Time Frame: At 6 hours
Patients will answer a question enquiring about the satisfaction with the new oromucosal solution in terms of solution volume
At 6 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 24, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 8, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

November 10, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 16, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 23, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 10, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

At this stage, IPD sharing plan has to been discussed and finalised

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Pain

Clinical Trials on Paracetamol Uniflash 125mg

Subscribe