Nanocrystalline Hydroxyapatite Bone Substitute for Treating Periodontal Intrabony Defects

November 24, 2020 updated by: Weam Ahmed Elbattawy

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Open Flap Debridement With or Without Nanocrystalline Hydroxyapatite Bone Graft in Management of Periodontal Intrabony Defects

The present clinical trial included 20 patients (11 females and 9 males, aged 36 to 56 years) suffering from moderate or advanced chronic periodontitis. Subjects were recruited from the outpatient clinic, Department of Oral Medicine and Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University. This clinical trial was meant to assess clinically and radiographically the possible predictable results regarding the use of nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite bone graft substitute together with open flap debridement versus open flap debridement alone in the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

periodontal intrabony defects in patients with moderate or advanced chronic periodontitis were treated with open flap debridement only in the control group while open flap debridement and Nanocrystalline Hydroxyapatite bone graft substitute was performed for the intervention group. probing pocket depth, clinical attachment level, gingival index, plaque index, gingival recession and bone defect area were assessed at baseline and six months post surgically to evaluate the possible improvement in the clinical and radiographic outcomes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 11865
        • Cairo University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

35 years to 56 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • systemically healthy patients
  • diagnosed with moderate to advanced chronic periodontitis
  • periodontal defects with at least one site with probing pocket depth (PPD) ≥ 5mm, clinical attachment loss (CAL) ≥ 4mm and two or three-walled intra-bony defects ≥ 3mm
  • evidence of intrabony defects using periapical radiographs

Exclusion Criteria:

  • teeth with suprabony defects or 1-wall intrabony defects
  • pregnant or lactating women
  • patients taking any medication 3 months prior to the study
  • patients receiving any periodontal treatment 6 months prior to study initiation
  • former or current smokers.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: OFD control group
open flap debridement for periodontal intrabony defects
open flap debridement for managing two and three walls intrabony periodontal defects
Experimental: n-HA bone graft intervention group
Nanocrystalline Hydroxyapatite (n-HA) bone graft substitute was added to periodontal intrabony defects
open flap debridement for managing two and three walls intrabony periodontal defects
Nanocrystalline Hydroxyapatite bone graft substitute for managing two and three walls intrabony periodontal defects

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in probing pocket depth
Time Frame: baseline and after six months
William's graduated periodontal probe used to measure probing pocket depth from the gingival margin to the base of the sulcus
baseline and after six months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in clinical attachment level
Time Frame: baseline and after six months
William's graduated periodontal probe used to measure clinical attachment level from the cementoenamel junction to the base of the sulcus
baseline and after six months
change in the bone defect area
Time Frame: baseline and after six months
periodical digital radiographs using Digora software to measure the bone defect area
baseline and after six months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 25, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

May 25, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 25, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 27, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • nano version 1

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Periodontitis

Clinical Trials on open flap debridement

Subscribe