Localization of the Reward Positivity to ACC

January 4, 2024 updated by: University Hospital, Ghent
The exact function of the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) is one of the largest riddles in cognitive neuroscience and a major challenge in mental health research. ACC dysfunction contributes to a broad spectrum of neurological and psychiatric disorders, such as depression, ADHD, Parkinson's disease, OCD and many others, but nobody knows what it actually does. Recently a new theory has been developed about ACC function; the HRL-ACC (Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning Theory of ACC). This theory proposes that the ACC selects and motivates high-level tasks based on the principles of hierarchical reinforcement learning. The ACC associates values with tasks, selects the correct tasks and applies control over other neural networks (such as the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia), which execute the tasks. The values of these tasks are attributed based on "reward prediction error signals", which are sent from the midbrain dopamine system to the ACC. These signals can be recorded using scalp-EEG as an "event-related brain potential" (ERP), which is called the "reward positivity". Until this day, the exact origin of the reward positivity is not yet known. Studies have delivered strong indirect evidence that the reward positivity is generated in the ACC. However, there is an important lack of direct evidence to support this hypothesis. The goal of this study is to provide direct evidence that the reward positivity is generated in the ACC by letting a group of patients with refractory epilepsy perform the virtual T-maze task (which is known to elicit reward positivity) and simultaneously recording intracranial video-EEG.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is a monocentric prospective interventional clinical trial that will include patients with refractory epilepsy and for whom a hospitalization at the Centre for Neurophysiological Monitoring (CNM) at the University Hospital Ghent is planned for invasive video-EEG recording. This hospitalization is part of a pre-surgical work-up to determine if the patient is eligible for resective surgery. It is important to note that the decision to plan the patient for invasive video-EEG monitoring is made by neurologists and neurosurgeons specialized in refractory epilepsy and is in no way connected to this study.

Every patient that will be admitted to the CNM for invasive video-EEG monitoring has a consultation with Prof. Dr. Alfred Meurs about one month before hospitalization. During this consultation, Prof. Meurs will ask if the patient is willing to participate in this study. If the patient agrees and has given informed consent, the first session of the study will take place directly after the consultation. However, if the patient is not available at that time, a new appointment will be made for the first session. The first session has to take place before admission to the CNM.

The study consists of two experimental sessions. The first session takes place after giving informed consent and before admission to the hospital for invasive video-EEG monitoring. Therefore, this session is completely study-specific and may require and extra visit to the hospital if the patient is not available right after the consultation with Prof. Meurs.

During this session, the patient will perform the virtual T-maze task for 20 minutes while scalp-EEG will be recorded simultaneously. During this task, patients will see a T-maze on a computer screen and have to choose at every junction whether they go left or right. Depending on the direction they choose, they get rewarded or not. This feedback will elicit the reward positivity.

The rationale for this first session is that it is important to know whether or not the patient produces a normal reward positivity measured by scalp EEG, before the intracranial electrodes are placed.

The second session takes place during the admission at the CNM, after the intracranial electrodes are placed. The invasive video-EEG monitoring is part of a pre-surgical work-up and is planned independently from the study. During this session, the patient will once again have to perform the virtual T-maze task while scalp-EEG and intracranial-EEG will simultaneously be recorded.

After the two sessions, the data will be analysed using ERP analysis and the amplitude of the reward positivity will be calculated for every electrode. It is expected that the amplitude of the reward positivity ERP-component will be largest for patients with electrodes in the frontal lobe, located closely to the ACC. This will deliver direct evidence that the reward positivity is in fact generated in the ACC.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Oost-Vlaanderen
      • Ghent, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium, 9000
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Neurology, University Hospital Ghent
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Patients with refractory epilepsy
  • Planned hospitalization at CNM for invasive video-EEG recording with subdural, epidural and/or depth electrodes
  • Patients have to be able to give informed consent themselves
  • Imaging after placement of electrodes (CT and/or MRI) has to be available

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients known with dementia or severe cognitive and/or psychiatric disorders that makes it impossible for patients to participate in this study
  • Active alcohol and/or drug abuse

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention group
Each participant will undergo two sessions, consisting of performing the virtual T-maze task, scalp-EEG recording and/or intracranial video-EEG recording.
Patients will have to perform the virtual T-maze task, which is known to elicit reward positivity. During this task, the patients will see a virtual T-maze on a computer screen and have to choose at every junction whether they go right or left. Depending on the direction they choose, they either get positive or negative feedback (reward or no reward). This feedback is chosen completely at random, on a 50% reward/50% no reward basis.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Distribution of reward positivity amplitude
Time Frame: Date of inclusion to date of second session (about one month)
Calculation of amplitude of reward positivity ERP-component recorded by intracranial electrodes and scalp-distribution of amplitude across all subjects
Date of inclusion to date of second session (about one month)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Location in brain most likely to represent source of reward positivity
Time Frame: Date of inclusion to date of second session (about one month)
Electrode with highest reward positivity amplitude and corresponding location in brain, analysis across all subjects
Date of inclusion to date of second session (about one month)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alfred Meurs, MD PhD, University Hospital Ghent, Department of Neurology

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 4, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 21, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 28, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Refractory Epilepsy

Clinical Trials on Virtual T-maze task

Subscribe