Comparison of the Ultrasound Supra-inguinal Fascia Iliaca Block vs Femoral Nerve Block

January 2, 2021 updated by: Mechaal Benali, University Tunis El Manar

Fracture of the Upper Femoral Extremity in the Elderly Patients: Comparison of the Supra-inguinal Fascia Iliaca Block VS Femoral Nerve Block Ultrasound Guided in the Positioning and Post-operative Analgesia for Spinal Anesthesia

Patients were randomly assigned to tow groups: infrainguinal ultrasound guided iliaca fascia block (FIBSI) and femoral nerve block (FNB) for FIBSI, the probe is placed transversely between anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) and the pubic spine. The transducer is translated laterally to identify the Sartorius muscle. Cephalic inclination of the probe. The medial end of the transducer faces towards the umbilicus, which is the final position. The 100mm neurostimulation needle is advanced in the In Plan approach to pass through the iliac fascia. Once the correct position is confirmed, 30 ml of 1% Ropivacaine is gradually injected between the iliac fascia and the iliac muscle.

For FNB, the probe was placed under the inguinal ligament. The femoral vessels and the nerve section are visualized; The 100mm neurostimulation needle is advanced in the In Plan approach and 30ml of 1% Ropivacaine has been injected along the nerve sheath

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Patients were randomly assigned to tow groups: infrainguinal ultrasound guided iliaca fascia block (FIBSI) and femoral nerve block (FNB) for FIBSI,the probe is placed transversely between the EIAS and the pubic spine,The transducer is translated laterally to identify the sartorius muscle. Cephalic inclination of the probe: The iliac muscle is located at the medial border in the shadow of the superior anterior iliac spine.The medial end of the transducer faces towards the umbilicus, which is the final position.

The anatomy identified, from superficial to deep, consisting of subcutaneous fat, internal oblique muscle, transverse abdominal muscle, iliaca fascia covering the iliac muscle. The 100mm neurostimulation needle is advanced in In Plan approach to cross the iliaca fascia. With the tip of the needle just below the iliaca fascia, 2 ml of local anesthetic was injected to confirm the location of the tip. Once the correct position is confirmed, 30 ml of 1% Ropivacaine is gradually injected between the iliac fascia and the iliac muscle.

for FNB,The probe was placed under the inguinal ligament. Femoral vessels and sectional nerve are visualized. The nerve was located, an 100mm neurostimulation needle is advanced in In Plan approach, and 30 ml of 1% Ropivacaine was injected along the nerve sheath.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Mrezga
      • Nabeul, Mrezga, Tunisia, 8000
        • Mechaal Benali

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) class I, II, and III patients scheduled for emergency surgery with the diagnosis of proximal femur fracture

Exclusion Criteria:

  • hemorrhagic diathesis,
  • peripheral neuropathies,
  • allergy to amide local anaesthetics,
  • mental disorders,
  • those on analgesics within 8 hour prior to performing nerve block

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: FIBSI group
ultrasound supra inguinal Fascia iliaca block
the supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block versus the femoral nerve block
Experimental: FNB group
ultrasound femoral nerve block
the supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block versus the femoral nerve block

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Positioning pain before performing spinal anesthesia
Time Frame: 20 minutes after realization of blocks
Pain in positioning was assessed by measuring the simple verbal scale (0= no pain- 4= worst pain possible) after 20 minutes for realization block
20 minutes after realization of blocks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative pain
Time Frame: at the third, sixth, twelfth and twenty-four hours postoperatively
Postoperative pain was assessed by the Simple Verbal Scale (SVS) at the third, sixth, twelfth and twenty-four hours postoperatively
at the third, sixth, twelfth and twenty-four hours postoperatively
quality of patient placement in the sitting position
Time Frame: after 20 minutes of realization of block
The quality of patient positioning was subjectively rated as unsatisfactory, good or optimal depending on the ease of positioning for spinal anesthesia
after 20 minutes of realization of block
The level of sensory block at 20 minutes after realization of block
Time Frame: before and 20 minutes after realization of blocks

The quality of the sensory block was evaluated by the PinPrick Test in the external, internal and anterior part of the thigh in comparison with the same stimulation at the level of the contralateral limb.

using a sterile needle at 20 minutes after realization of block on the territory of femoral, obturator and lateral cutaneous nerve of the thigh

before and 20 minutes after realization of blocks
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: five minutes after the end of the realization of spinal anesthesia
Patient satisfaction was evaluated after completion of spinal anesthesia by using a two-point score: 1= good, if necessary, I'll repeat it and 2= bad, I will never repeat it again.
five minutes after the end of the realization of spinal anesthesia

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 20, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 20, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 20, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 25, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 29, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 31, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 5, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 2, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • UTEM FIBSI

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hip Fracture

Clinical Trials on Locoregional analgesia

Subscribe