A 12 Week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of an Eye Cream

November 27, 2023 updated by: Revision Skincare

A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of an Eye Cream for Moderate to Severe Dark Circles and Undereye Puffiness

This single center, open-label clinical study was conducted to assess the efficacy and tolerance of a topical eye cream when used over the course of 12 weeks by healthy women with moderate to severe under-eye dark circles, moderate under eye puffiness, and mild fine lines and wrinkles. A total of 37 subjects were enrolled into the study.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This single center, open-label clinical study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of an eye cream on healthy female subjects between 35 to 60 years of age with Fitzpatrick Skin Type I - VI, and moderate to severe dark circles and under-eye puffiness. This study aims to evaluate the following objectives:

  1. To evaluate the eye cream impact on undereye dark circles, undereye puffiness, fine lines and wrinkles periorbital eye area, and overall appearance periorbital eye area, as evaluated by investigator clinical grading, chromameter, VISIA clinical photography, and subjective questionnaire performed at baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12.
  2. To evaluate the eye cream impact on under eye blood flow, as evaluated by laser doppler performed at baseline, week 8, and week 12.
  3. To assess objective and subjective tolerability of Dryness, Erythema, and Edema, and Burning, Stinging, Peeling, and Itching evaluated by investigator and subjective grading at baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12.

A total of 37 subjects completed the study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New Jersey
      • Teaneck, New Jersey, United States, 07666
        • Validated Claim Support, LLC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Females in good general health
  • With Fitzpatrick Skin Type I - VI
  • Moderate to severe under eye dark circles
  • Moderate undereye puffiness
  • Mild to moderate fine lines and wrinkles

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who have used retinol or eye cream / serum 7 days prior to study commencement
  • Nursing, pregnant, or planning a pregnancy during this study
  • Having a health condition and / or pre-existing or dormant dermatologic disease on the face

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Eye Cream

Eye Cream composed of botanical extracts, bioavailable peptides, THD Ascorbate and Caffeine.

Subjects to apply a dime size amount onto the under-eye area and crow's feet area while avoiding direct eye contact twice daily for the duration of the 12-week clinical study.

Facial cleansing lotion to be used by study participants (morning and evening, 2x daily).
Anti-aging facial moisturizer to be used by study participants after anti-aging daily serum before sunscreen (morning and evening, 2x daily).

Neutrogena Ultra Sheer Dry Touch SPF 30. Sunscreen to be applied after application of the facial moisturizer in the morning. Participants were asked to reapply every 2 hours.

Per FDA this intervention is an over the counter

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Investigator Clinical Grading versus Baseline
Time Frame: 12 weeks

The primary efficacy endpoint will be investigator clinical grading using a Modified Griffiths 10 point scale and a validated photonumeric scale for undereye dark circles

A decrease in scores at post baseline timepoints (weeks 4, 8, and 12) in comparison to baseline indicates an improvement for the indicated parameter.

The efficacy parameters will be assessed globally on each subject's face using a validated photonumeric scale for dark circles and Modified Griffiths 10-point scale according to the following numerical definitions (half-point scores may be used as necessary to more accurately describe the skin condition):

0 = none (best possible condition); 1 to 3 = mild; 4 to 6 = moderate; 7 to 9 = severe (worst possible condition). The lower the score equates to the best possible outcome.

12 weeks
Bioinstrumentation: Laser Doppler
Time Frame: 12 weeks

Bioinstrumentation measurements includes INL 191 Blood FlowMeter laser doppler

A standard surface probe approximately 17mm in diameter was placed on the right or left undereye area per randomization and measurements in perfusion units (AU) were obtained at baseline week 8 and week 12.

An increase in AU values indicates an improvement in dark circles

12 weeks
Bioinstrumentation: Chromameter
Time Frame: 12 weeks

Bioinstrumentation measurements includes Chroma Meter CR-200 (Konica Minolta, Tokyo, JPN)

Measurements were taken on the right or left undereye area, per randomization on each subject in triplicate and averaged at baseline, week 4, 8 and 12. Three color value characteristics are evaluated: L* (100 = white, 0 = black) and a* (red-green)

An increase in L* indicates an improvement A decrease in a* indicates an improvement

12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lack of significant increase in objective investigator tolerability parameters at week 4, 8, and 12 compared to baseline
Time Frame: 12 weeks

The second outcome measure is objective tolerability endpoint. Investigator Tolerability Assessment includes Erythema, Edema and Dryness.

A decrease in scores or lack of significant increase at week 4, 8, and 12 in comparison to Baseline indicates tolerability/safety of the test material. Five point scale with a lower score indicating a better outcome.

Example for Erythema: Erythema 0 = None No erythema of the treatment area

  1. = very slight erythema (barely perceptible)
  2. = well-defined erythema
  3. = Moderate to severe erythema
  4. = Severe erythema (beet redness) to slight eschar formation
12 weeks
Lack of significant increase in Subjective investigator tolerability parameters at week 4, 8, and 12 compared to baseline
Time Frame: 12 weeks

The secondary tolerability endpoint will be the Subjective Tolerability Assessment of Stinging, Tingling, Itching, and Burning

A decrease in scores or lack of significant increase at week 4, 8, and 12 in comparison to Baseline indicates tolerability/safety of the test material. Four point scale with a lower score indicating a better outcome.

Example Burning.

0 = None

  1. = Mild
  2. = Moderate
  3. = Severe
12 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change In Facial parameters in a self-assessment questionnaire versus Baseline and % Agreement
Time Frame: 12 weeks

Self-Assessment Questionnaire and the Subject Treatment Satisfaction. A decrease or increase in response values at week 4, 8, and 12, and indicates an improvement compared to baseline response values.

Subjects are asked to rate based on a scoring system of the following:

from 5 (completely agree) to 1 (completely disagree). The best outcome is to Completely Agree with the statement/ question being asked.

12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Anna Hardy, Validated Claim Support

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 20, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 30, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 27, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data will not be shared with other researchers

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Wrinkle

Clinical Trials on Gentle Cleansing Lotion

3
Subscribe