- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04711018
Comparison of Various Measures for Anticipating Difficult Laryngoscopy (COMPAD-T)
Comparison of Various Measures for Anticipating Difficult Laryngoscopy in Turkish Population: An Observational Study
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Creating a regression model among selected bedside tests for predicting difficult laryngoscopy )defined as Grade III or IV view during laryngoscopy according to Cormack-Lehane classification) is the primary objective. Recruiting of 145 ASA I-II adult patients who would have an elective surgery under general anesthesia were planned.
Criteria for exclusion were: a history of craniofacial surgery or restriction of cervical mobility, edentulous patients, pregnant women, patients who did not have a proper mouth opening (< 3 cm), and those who might require awake intubation or rapid sequence induction, cancellation of the surgery or change in the anesthetic strategy.
The selected tests and clinical situations were:
The presence of retrognathia (reduced temporomandibular joint-incisor distance) Buck teeth Modified Mallampati test (MMT) in the sitting position without phonation. A scale ranging between 1 and 4 points is used and scores of 3 or 4 are considered as predictors of DL. Upper lip bite test (ULBT) performed in a neutral position. ULBT is graded as 1-3 according to the extension ability of lower incisors.
Sternomental distance - The distance between the mentum and upper border of the manubrium sterni when the head is fully extended and the mouth is closed.
Thyromental distance (TMD) - The distance between mentum and the thyroid notch when the head is fully extended.
Interincisor distance (IID) - The distance between upper and lower incisors when the mouth is fully opened.
Neck circumference (NC) - It was measured at the level of the cricoid cartilage, perpendicular to the cervical axis.
The patients are premedicated with 0.03 mg/kg and oxygenated with the help of a bag-mask. Anesthesia is induced by consequent administration of 2 mcg/kg fentanyl, 1 mg/kg lidocaine, 2 mg/kg propofol, and 0.7 mg/kg rocuronium bromide thereafter. Two minutes after induction, the laryngoscopy is performed
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Istanbul, Turkey, 34320
- Avcılar Murat Koluk State Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- ASA I-II
- Candidate for elective surgery under general anesthesia
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of craniofacial surgery or restriction of cervical mobility,
- Edentulous patients
- Pregnancy
- Patients who do not have a proper mouth opening (< 3 cm)
- Patients who might require awake intubation or rapid sequence induction.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Case-Control
- Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Group DL (+)
Grade III or IV laryngeal view according to Cormack-Lehane classification
|
The laryngoscopy is performed with the help of an appropriate size Macintosh blade.
The patient's head is held in the sniffing position.
External manipulation is not used for improving the view in this investigation.
|
|
Group DL (-)
Grade I or II laryngeal view according to Cormack-Lehane classification
|
The laryngoscopy is performed with the help of an appropriate size Macintosh blade.
The patient's head is held in the sniffing position.
External manipulation is not used for improving the view in this investigation.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Difficult laryngoscopy
Time Frame: Up to two weeks after preoperative examination
|
Grade III or IV laryngeal view before endotracheal intubation
|
Up to two weeks after preoperative examination
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- el-Ganzouri AR, McCarthy RJ, Tuman KJ, Tanck EN, Ivankovich AD. Preoperative airway assessment: predictive value of a multivariate risk index. Anesth Analg. 1996 Jun;82(6):1197-204. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199606000-00017.
- Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Caplan RA, Blitt CD, Connis RT, Nickinovich DG, Hagberg CA, Caplan RA, Benumof JL, Berry FA, Blitt CD, Bode RH, Cheney FW, Connis RT, Guidry OF, Nickinovich DG, Ovassapian A; American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology. 2013 Feb;118(2):251-70. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31827773b2. No abstract available.
- Shiga T, Wajima Z, Inoue T, Sakamoto A. Predicting difficult intubation in apparently normal patients: a meta-analysis of bedside screening test performance. Anesthesiology. 2005 Aug;103(2):429-37. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200508000-00027.
- Kim JC, Ki Y, Kim J, Ahn SW. Ethnic considerations in the upper lip bite test: the reliability and validity of the upper lip bite test in predicting difficult laryngoscopy in Koreans. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Jan 10;19(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0675-5.
- Yildirim I, Inal MT, Memis D, Turan FN. Determining the Efficiency of Different Preoperative Difficult Intubation Tests on Patients Undergoing Caesarean Section. Balkan Med J. 2017 Sep 29;34(5):436-443. doi: 10.4274/balkanmedj.2016.0877. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
- Selvi O, Kahraman T, Senturk O, Tulgar S, Serifsoy E, Ozer Z. Evaluation of the reliability of preoperative descriptive airway assessment tests in prediction of the Cormack-Lehane score: A prospective randomized clinical study. J Clin Anesth. 2017 Feb;36:21-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.08.006. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- HasekiTRERH
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Difficult Laryngoscopy
-
Samsung Medical CenterCompletedDifficult LaryngoscopyKorea, Republic of
-
Eskisehir Osmangazi UniversityCompletedIntubation; Difficult or Failed | Difficult LaryngoscopyTurkey
-
Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Education and Research...RecruitingPediatric Anesthesia | Difficult LaryngoscopyTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Tanta UniversityCompletedUltrasound | Prediction | Difficult LaryngoscopyEgypt
-
Institut Universitari DexeusCompletedLaryngoscopy | Difficult or Failed Intubation | VoiceSpain
-
Tanta UniversityRecruitingPediatric | Elective Surgery | Airway | Difficult Laryngoscopy | UltrasonographicEgypt
-
Mongi Slim HospitalNot yet recruitingAirway Complication of Anesthesia | Ultrasound | Laryngoscopy | Difficult Airways
-
Lawson Health Research InstituteNot yet recruitingAirway Management | Intubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult or Failed | Video Laryngoscopy
-
Masarykova Nemocnice v Usti nad Labem, Krajska...Not yet recruitingDifficult Airway | Laryngoscopy | Airway Complication of Anaesthesia | High Flow Nasal Canula | Airway Anesthesia | Difficult / Failed Intubation
-
Ordu UniversityNot yet recruitingAnesthesia Morbidity | Intubation; Difficult or Failed | Anesthesia Intubation Complication | Laryngoscopy
Clinical Trials on Laryngoscopy
-
Tunis UniversityRecruitingThe Time Taken for Successful Tracheal Intubation in Each TechniqueTunisia
-
Universidad de AntioquiaIPS Universitaria-Universidad de AntioquiaCompletedAirway Complication of Anesthesia | Airway TraumaColombia
-
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center...UnknownIntubation, IntratrachealUnited States
-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterNot yet recruitingSurfactant Deficiency Syndrome Neonatal | Respiratory Distress Syndrome (Neonatal)United States
-
Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and PharmacyCompleted
-
University College DublinLeiden University Medical Center; National Maternity Hospital, IrelandRecruitingIntubation | Infant Respiratory Distress Syndrome | Infant, Newborn | Intubation Complications | Video LaryngoscopyNorway, Poland, Czechia, Italy, Spain, Greece, Croatia, Romania, Ukraine, Hungary
-
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical CentreCompleted
-
Fundación para la Investigación Biosanitaria del...Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias; Fundación AsturcorCompleted
-
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiCompletedDifficult IntubationUnited States
-
Medical University of ViennaCompletedDifficult Airway | InfantsAustria