Comparison of Aorto-iliac Endovascular Interventions With and Without the EndoNaut Workstation (COM-ENDO)

January 15, 2021 updated by: Therenva
The aim of this retrospective, multicenter study is to demonstrate that the use of EndoNaut for aortoiliac endovascular procedures has a clinical impact for the patient (reduction in irradiation and the volume of contrast product) as well as for the nursing staff (reduction irradiation) compared to procedures performed without EndoNaut.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Minimally invasive endovascular interventions are increasingly replacing conventional surgeries, and have become the therapeutic benchmark for a large number of pathologies thanks in particular to advances in image-guided therapy. Therenva offers a comprehensive and consistent lightweight navigation solution (EndoNaut®) for endovascular procedures. This navigation station makes it possible to secure and guide the interventional gesture by providing relevant information extracted during the preoperative phase. This information is rendered in augmented reality using artificial intelligence algorithms and digital simulation. This alternative solution to a hybrid room, but which offers equivalent functionality, is compatible with all operating rooms, regardless of the interventional environment. Benefits of imaging fusion remain to be assessed on a larger scale. The aim of this multicenter study is to demonstrate that the use of EndoNaut for aortoiliac endovascular procedures has a clinical impact for the patient (reduction in irradiation and the volume of contrast product) as well as for the nursing staff (reduction irradiation) compared to procedures performed without EndoNaut.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

150

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Rennes, France, 35000
        • Recruiting
        • Chu Rennes
        • Contact:
          • Adrien Kaladji, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Male and female patients with unilateral or bilateral common iliac aneurysm or stenosis, treated with endovascular technique

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Unilateral or bilateral aorto-iliac or iliac aneurysm/stenosis
  • Suitable for endovascular repair
  • Major patients
  • Patients not opposed to their participation in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients requiring conventional surgical revascularization.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Procedures with EndoNaut
Endovascular interventions using the EndoNaut workstation. 3D image fusion is used for overlaying arterial information on top of fluoroscopic images
Percutaneous procedure with stent placement
Procedures without EndoNaut
Control group, endovascular interventions without 3D image fusion
Percutaneous procedure with stent placement

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Volume of contrast product used during the routine care procedure (ml)
Time Frame: At enrollment
Volume are reported in mL
At enrollment
Irradiation parameters: evaluation of the Fluoroscopy duration (min)
Time Frame: At enrollment
Parameter given by the X-ray imaging device
At enrollment
Irradiation parameters: dose-area quantification (mGy/m2)
Time Frame: At enrollment
Parameter given by the X-ray imaging device
At enrollment
Irradiation parameters: measurement of air Kerma (mGy)
Time Frame: At enrollment
Parameter given by the X-ray imaging device
At enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Procedure time (min)
Time Frame: At enrollment
Total procedure time
At enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 15, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

January 19, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 19, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aortic Aneurysm

Clinical Trials on Aorto-iliac endovascular procedure

Subscribe