Dynamic Balance Training in Multiple Sclerosis

January 20, 2021 updated by: Marquette University
This study will test a new technique for improving balance while walking in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). The technique focuses on having people with MS safely practice walking on simulated, uneven terrain that challenges balance and more accurately mimics walking in the community. The goal is to improve balance while walking in order to improve mobility and decrease the risk of falls. Recently, we developed a state-of-the-art treadmill system that allows us to create a challenging walking environment by placing a treadmill onto a motion base. We are able to simulate uneven terrain through movements of the walking surface while maintaining a safe walking environment. We will use this system to conduct tests of balance while walking and to train people to walk on uneven surfaces. Our objective is to evaluate the use of uneven terrain for training gait and balance in people with MS. Participants will undergo a four-week training protocol designed to disrupt and challenge balance while walking. We anticipate that training on uneven terrain will enhance gait stability, improve overall walking function and balance and increase balance confidence compared to training on a stable surface.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants have been clinically diagnosed with multiple sclerosis
  • Must be capable of walking 10 meters independently with no physical assistance
  • Must be able to ascend/descend a small staircase (5 steps)
  • Medically stable
  • Able to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • they suffer from cognitive deficits that prevent them from following 1 step commands
  • unable to give informed consent
  • if they suffer from significant cardiovascular problems, respiratory failure, major orthopedic problems, or other medical conditions that affect balance (e.g. diabetic neuropathy, myopathy, or vertigo)
  • Significant medical comorbidity or concurrent illness limiting their capacity to conform to study requirements

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Training Group
During the 12-training day sessions, subjects will walk on the treadmill for a total of 30 minutes. Participants will walk at a comfortable pace while we perform controlled movements to the treadmill system. Subjects will be fitted with a fall-arrest harness and assisted onto the treadmill system. In the dynamic balance training group, we will move the motion base as participants walk in order to challenge their balance.
Participants in the training group will walk on an elevated treadmill that will move side-to-side in a pseudorandom manner, thereby increasing the difficulty to their balance. Participants are asked to walk independently for 30-minutes per session, for 12 days over 4 weeks.
No Intervention: Control Group
Subjects who are in the control group will also walk on the treadmill, but the motion base will remain stationary. They will complete 12-training day sessions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Functional Gait Assessment
Time Frame: Before and after training (occurs within 5-week period)
The functional gait assessment (FGA) is a clinically accepted tool and is used to measure postural stability before and after the proposed walking paradigm.
Before and after training (occurs within 5-week period)
Change in Dynamic Stability
Time Frame: Before and after training (occurs within 5-week period)
Dynamic Stability is assessed using the margin of stability (MoS). The MoS is defined as the center of mass position and velocity relative to the edge of the person's base of support. If the center of mass falls outside the base of support, the individual may require corrective action to restore balance and/or be at higher risk for loss of balance. For this study, we measured the center of mass motion and foot placement (i.e., base of support) in the medio-lateral direction to calculate each person's MoS before and after the 4-week walking sessions.
Before and after training (occurs within 5-week period)
Change in Step Width
Time Frame: Before and after training (occurs within 5-week period)
Step width was measured for all individuals as the distance (centimeters) between the left and right ankle during double-limb support of each gait cycle. We measured step width before and after the 4-week walking sessions.
Before and after training (occurs within 5-week period)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Step Length
Time Frame: Before and after training (occurs within 5-week period)
Step Length was measured for all individuals as the distance (centimeters) between the left big toe and right big toe at the time the heel of the leading foot made contact with the treadmill belt at each gait cycle. We measured step length before and after the 4-week walking sessions.
Before and after training (occurs within 5-week period)
Change in Step Frequency
Time Frame: Before and after training (occurs within 5-week period)
Step Frequency was measured for all individuals as the number of steps occurring within a 60-second time window (units of Hz). We measured step frequency before and after the 4-week walking sessions.
Before and after training (occurs within 5-week period)
Change in 10-Meter Walk Test
Time Frame: Before and after training (occurs within 5-week period)
The 10-Meter Walk Test was administered at self-selected overground walking speeds for each individual. We assess walking speed with this tool before and after the proposed walking paradigm.
Before and after training (occurs within 5-week period)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 4, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

January 22, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 22, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on Dynamic balance walking training

Subscribe