Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Paracetamol in Manament of Labour Pain

February 4, 2021 updated by: Mohamed Elsibai Anter, Menoufia University

Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Paracetamol in Manament of Labour Pain in a Low Resource Setting

to compare between the use of single dose of paracetamol and pethidine hydrochloride intravenously in management of labour pains

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

investigators conducted a randomized clinical study included including 96 primiparous women admitted to Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Menoufia University Hospitals, starting the study from May 2019 to March 2020 to assess the use of paracetamol intravenously versus Pethidine HCL intravenously in management of intrapartum pain. After obtaining approval from the local ethics committee, women who agreed to participate gave their signed informed consent after explanation of the trial benefits and hazards

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

96

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Menoufia
      • Shibīn Al Kawm, Menoufia, Egypt, 11111
        • Menoufia University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 35 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Primiparous
  • aged 18-35 years,
  • Term live singleton pregnancy,
  • Vertex presentation,
  • Spontaneous onset of labor at term 37-42 weeks gestation,
  • In active phase of of 1st stage of labour (cervix dilatation 3- 4 cm).

Exclusion Criteria:

Clinical evidence of cephalopelvic disproportion

  • Use of any kind of analgesia prior to study
  • Any medical disorder during pregnancy (liver or kidney impairment)
  • Induction of labor, Intrauterine fetal death
  • Evidence of fetal distress
  • Antenatal diagnosis of congenital malformation
  • Previous history of hypersensitivity to either drug
  • Extremes of age (i.e. below 18 or above 35)
  • Multiple pregnancies
  • Cervical dilatation more than 6 cm.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: paracetamol group
Included 48 pregnant women who received 1000 mg of intravenous paracetamol. The treatment was administered at the begining of the active phase of 1st stage of labor [roughly defined as a cervical dilatation of 3-4 cm and a cervical effacement ≥ 50%].
100 ml containing 1000 mg paracetamol -50 mg pethidine HCL
Active Comparator: pethidine group
Included 48 pregnant women who received 50 mg of intravenous pethidine HCL diluted in 10 ml normal saline. The treatment was administered at the beginning of the active phase of 1st stage of labor [roughly defined as a cervical dilatation of 3-4 cm and a cervical effacement ≥ 50%].
100 ml containing 1000 mg paracetamol -50 mg pethidine HCL

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change of the intensity of perceived labor pain.
Time Frame: immediately after the intervention and up to 3 hours after the intervension
Labour pain was semi-objectively assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS). In this technique, the patient is shown a ten cm line which represent at one end no pain and the other worst pain, and the patient is asked to point on the line where her pain lies. This scale has the added advantage that the pain can be given a numerical value.
immediately after the intervention and up to 3 hours after the intervension

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
duration of the active phase of the 1st stage of labor
Time Frame: immediately from start of active phase of the 1st stage of labor till the end of first stage
immediately from start of active phase of the 1st stage of labor till the end of first stage
duration of the 2nd stage of labor
Time Frame: immediately from start of second stage till deliver of fetus
immediately from start of second stage till deliver of fetus
need for further analgesia
Time Frame: immediately after the intervention till the end of first stage of labour
immediately after the intervention till the end of first stage of labour
maternal dizziness, nausea and/or vomiting
Time Frame: immediately after the intervention till the end of first stage
immediately after the intervention till the end of first stage
mode of delivery (vaginal or by caesarian
Time Frame: immediately after the intervention
immediately after the intervention
1- and 5-minutes Apgar scores.
Time Frame: immediately after delivery of the fetus
immediately after delivery of the fetus
need for neonatal resuscitation
Time Frame: immediately after delivery of the fetus
immediately after delivery of the fetus
need for NICU admission
Time Frame: immediately after delivery of the fetus
immediately after delivery of the fetus
Neonatal respiratory distress .
Time Frame: immediately after delivery of the fetus
immediately after delivery of the fetus

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Mohamed Anter, Faculty of medicine-Menoufia university-shebin elkom -egypt

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 10, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

May 10, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 1, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 9, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 9, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Labor Pain

Clinical Trials on paracetamol-pethidine

Subscribe