A Study of Bedside Versus Hallway Rounding

February 11, 2021 updated by: Tracey Milligan, Brigham and Women's Hospital

A Study of Bedside Versus Hallway Rounding for Neurology Inpatient Teams

The purpose of this study is to compare bedside rounding with hallway and conference room rounding on the neurology inpatient ward service at an academic hospital and identify best practices associated with educational and patient care outcomes. Specifically, this study will determine which rounding practices are associated with a positive educational experience for learners, greatest patient and care team communication, and time efficiency.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study will evaluate the efficacy of bedside rounding and compare it to hallway and conference room rounding on the neurology ward service at the Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH). The neurology ward service consists of two teams, each with 10-15 vascular neurology and general neurology patients. The teams perform daily attending rounds.

Each team consists of an attending physician, a senior supervisory resident, two junior residents, several rotating residents and interns from other departments, medical students, as well as a physician assistant who alternates daily between the teams. Neurology attendings spend two weeks at a time on a team.

During a two-week attending rotation, we plan to designate one of the teams as the "bedside rounding team" and the other team as the "hallway rounding team", which will serve as the control group. The bedside rounding team will carry out patient presentations at the bedside, with a focus on the patient, while ensuring nursing involvement in each patient's room. The hallway rounding team ("the usual method") will present patients outside of the patient's room, without an added emphasis on nurse participation. Halfway through the two-week rotation, the team designation will switch in a crossover fashion, so that the initial bedside rounding team will become the hallway rounding team, and vice versa. Our planned study period is Monday through Friday for a consecutive 6-8 week period, and we anticipate including about 150-200 patients in our study.

To evaluate staff educational experience, patient and interprofessional communication, and clinical care outcomes of these two rounding approaches, we plan to survey patients, resident trainees, attendings, and nurses on both teams. For collection of data, a student observer or research assistant familiar with the study purpose and methods will accompany a neurology team during weekday morning rounds and record data about the composition and timing of rounds.

Eligible participants include adult patients and providers (nurses; physicians, including residents and attendings; and ancillary providers) involved in the inpatient neurology service at BWH. Patients whose primary language is English will be included in the study with notation of this feature. Observations will focus on activities of the physician providers. Surveys for medical education will involve physician participants who give consent. Surveys of patient care and communication will involve patients and nurses who give consent.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

81

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115-6128
        • Brigham Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • new admission to neurology team

Exclusion Criteria:

  • comfort measures as sole treatment goal

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Bedside
The bedside rounding team will perform patient presentations at the bedside, with a focus on the patient, and will ensure nursing involvement when rounding on each patient,
Team rounded on new admissions either in hallway or at the bedside
Active Comparator: Hallway
The hallway rounding team will present patients outside of the patient's room, without an emphasis on nurse participation.
Team rounded on new admissions either in hallway or at the bedside

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean patient rounding time as assessed by time-motion analysis
Time Frame: 90 days
The first primary outcome measure will be mean rounding time in minutes per patient in the bedside and hallway groups.
90 days
Mean rounding proportion spent at the patient's bedside as assessed by time-motion analysis
Time Frame: 90 days
The second primary outcome measure will be mean rounding proportion in percent spent at the patient's bedside in the bedside and hallway groups
90 days
Mean rounding proportion spent on various rounding activities as assessed by time-motion analysis
Time Frame: 90 days
The third primary outcome measure will be mean rounding proportion in percent spent on history taking, review of data such as imaging, physical exam, answering patient questions, teaching, and discussion of plan in the bedside and hallway groups
90 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient, nurse, resident, and attending physician satisfaction with rounds as assessed by surveys
Time Frame: 90 days
The secondary outcome will be patient, nurse, resident, and attending physician satisfaction with and perception of rounds as assessed by surveys using a 5-point Likert scale with 5 being the highest satisfaction.
90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 5, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 11, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 15, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 15, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 11, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2019P002584

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Education, Medical

Clinical Trials on Assigned to a rounding style

Subscribe