Feasibility of Remote Home Support Coaches (SOCIAL Study)

April 21, 2023 updated by: Shalendar Bhasin, MD, Brigham and Women's Hospital

The SOCIAL Study: Feasibility of Remote Home Support Coaches to Decrease the Physical and Psychological Impact of Social Distancing on Older Adults

The goal of this this study is to develop and test the feasibility of a remotely delivered brief behavioral activation intervention to decrease the negative physical and psychological consequences of being homebound among older adults during the time of COVID.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The goal of this study is to develop and test the feasibility of a remotely delivered brief behavioral activation intervention to decrease the negative physical and psychological consequences of being homebound among older adults during the time of COVID.The intervention will focus on decreasing the impact of social isolation, inactivity and poor nutrition on old people during a time when many in-person social activities are not possible. It will be delivered through telephone and other communication tools that allow remote (i.e. not in person) communication over 10 sessions. Subjects will be a total of 60 people aged 75 years an older, who will be recruited from primary care in the Boston MA region and senior living facilities in the Baltimore MD region. Coaches will be trained using an on-line based modules developed to support this intervention. Self-report outcomes will be measured by telephone at baseline and 4-month follow-up.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21201
        • University of Maryland School of Medicine
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Brigham and Women's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

75 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • • Men or women who are 75 years or older

    • Must be a patient of Mass General Brigham affiliated with Primary Care Physician departments in Boston, MA OR be a resident of Brightview Senior Living and Assisted Living facilities near Baltimore, MD

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • Men or women who are 74 years and younger

    • Participants who are not affiliated with Primary Care Physician departments at Mass General Brigham or a resident of an assisted living facility in Baltimore, MD
    • Unable to adequately complete the Evaluation to Provide Consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Primary Aim
Brief Behavioral Activation coaching will be delivered by telephone and other remote technology by trained coaches. Over 10 sessions, the coaches will help people to find meaningful activities to decrease loneliness, increase physical activity and improve nutrition.
A telephone-based brief behavioral activation coaching program that will involve 10 sessions over 4 months. Sessions will focus on helping people to identify meaningful activities that they can safely do to decrease loneliness, increase physical activity and improve nutrition.
Other Names:
  • Remote coaching

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physical Activity - Self-report survey to measure engagement in activities
Time Frame: change from baseline to 4-month follow-up
Yale Physical Activity Survey (self-report)
change from baseline to 4-month follow-up
Loneliness assessment - 20 item, self-report assessment to measure loneliness
Time Frame: change from baseline to 4-month follow-up
UCLA Loneliness Scale 3.0 (self-report) 20 item, self-report assessment to measure loneliness. Scale from 1(never) to 4(often)
change from baseline to 4-month follow-up
Physical Activity - step activity monitor to track daily steps walked
Time Frame: change in steps from the first week of study to final week (week 16) of study
average steps walked per day
change in steps from the first week of study to final week (week 16) of study

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PROMIS Short form to measure level 2 adult depression
Time Frame: change from baseline to 4-month follow up
PROMIS Depression (Short Form 8-item, self report)
change from baseline to 4-month follow up
PROMIS short-form to measure anxiety in adults
Time Frame: change from baseline to 4-month follow up
PROMIS Anxiety (Short form 8-item, self report)
change from baseline to 4-month follow up
Late Life Function Instrument to assess functionality in elderly
Time Frame: change from baseline to 4-month follow up
Late Life Function Instrument (LLFDI - self report)
change from baseline to 4-month follow up
Late Life Function Instrument to access disability in elderly
Time Frame: change from baseline to 4-month follow up
Late Life Disability Instrument (LLFDI - self report)
change from baseline to 4-month follow up
Duke Social Support short scale to measure social support among older people
Time Frame: change from baseline to 4-month follow up
Duke Social Support Index (self-report)
change from baseline to 4-month follow up
Mini-nutritional assessment to determine if there is risk of malnourishment
Time Frame: change from baseline to 4-month follow up
Mini-nutritional assessment - Short Form
change from baseline to 4-month follow up
Likert 0-7 rating scale of participants satisfaction with the program
Time Frame: 4 month follow-up
Likert rating of satisfaction
4 month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nancy Latham, PhD, Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Denise Orwig, PhD, University of Maryland School of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 15, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 23, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 23, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 26, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 25, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2020P004113
  • 3P30AG031679-10S2 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Telephone-based coaching

Subscribe