Dual-task Training in Children With Cerebral Palsy

March 1, 2021 updated by: Sema BÜĞÜŞAN ORUÇ

The Effect of Dual-task Training on Activity and Participation in Children With Cerebral Palsy

There are studies investigating the dual-task effect in sitting, standing up without sitting and walking in children with spastic CP. Some of these studies investigated motor-motor, some of them motor-cognitive dual-task states, and children with CP were compared to typically developing children. In all these studies, it is clearly seen that children with CP have more dual-task complexities than their typically developing peers. Some of these studies draw attention to dual-task education in children with CP. However, other than a randomized controlled study and a case report in the literature, we did not find any studies investigating the effectiveness of dual-task training in children with CP. When the literature is examined in detail, there is no study that examines the effect of dual-task exercise programs on walking activities and children's participation in daily life in children with CP.

This study has been planned based on this deficiency in the literature. Based on ICF, This study has been planned dual-task training for children with CP.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

25

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ordu, Turkey
        • Ordu Uni

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

7 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being diagnosed with cerebral palsy,
  • Having spastic type unilateral and bilateral involvement,
  • Being between the ages of 7-18,
  • Being GMFCSS Level I and Level II,
  • Continuing normal education (not being a mainstreaming student),
  • Not having any surgical operation involving the musculoskeletal system in the last 6 months,
  • Not having Botulinum Toxin application in the last 6 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Failing to accomplish the cognitive task (starting from a number between 0-100 and not counting back 1 each)
  • Being a behavioral problem that makes it difficult to participate in the study,
  • Inability to walk without support

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: control group
classical physical therapy+ classical physical therapy
dual-task training
Other: study group
classical physical therapy+ dual-task training
dual-task training

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
10m walking test
Time Frame: 5 min
10m walking test (the speed of gait is measured)
5 min
10m walking test with dual-task
Time Frame: 5 min
10m walking test with dual-task (the speed of gait is measured) (dual- task is counting backwards)
5 min
10m backward walking test
Time Frame: 5 min
10m backward walking test (the speed of gait is measured)
5 min
10m backward walking test with dual-task
Time Frame: 5 min
10m backward walking test with dual-task (the speed of gait is measured) (dual- task is counting backwards)
5 min
balance
Time Frame: 15 min
Balance skills of participators are assessed with 'Pediatric Berg Balance' .
15 min
participation of daily life
Time Frame: 15 min
Participation of daily life of children are assessed with PODCI questionnaire.
15 min
Visual Gait Assessment
Time Frame: 10 min
Participators' positions of joints are assessed with Edinburg Visual Score. Children walked 10m walking pathway. The camera records were frontside, backward, and laterals.
10 min

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 27, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 27, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

February 27, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 26, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 1, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

March 2, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 2, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 1, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cerebral Palsy

Clinical Trials on dual-task training

Subscribe