Effectiveness of Combined Erector Spinae and Pecto-intercostal Fascial Plane Blocks Versus Thoracic Paravertebral Block in Perioperative Pain in Modified Radical Mastectomy

The Effectiveness of Combined U.S. Guided Erector Spinae and Pecto-intercostal Fascial Plane Blocks Versus U.S.Guided Thoracic Paravertebral Block in Controlling Perioperative Pain in Modified Radical Mastectomy, a Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a new evolving fascial pain block in the era of regional anaesthesia. ESPB was applied in varieties of surgeries and provided an eminent role in trauma patient especially those with fracture ribs. ESPB exhibits simple, safe and easy technique with minimal or no sympathetic blockade effects, thus gaining popularity in wide range of surgeries. The optimum effective dose of local anaesthetic, the effective volume of drug used for desired dermatomes. Comparison with different regional blocks is preferable to know the optimum analgesic technique for those population of patients (4). Many studies have already compared solo ESPB with thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA), thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB), serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) and pectoral nerves block. Only few case reports described the combination effect of rhomboid intercostal, transversus thoracic muscle and parasternal plane blocks to ESPB in modified radical mastectomy.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Modified Radical Mastectomy
• Intervention / Treatment: Drug: Bupivacaine Hydrochloride; Drug: Dexamethasone phosphate

Detailed Description

patients scheduled for modified radical mastectomy and axillary dissection under general anesthesia (GA) will be included in the study. The patients will be randomly allocated by a computer-generated table into one of the two study groups.Thoracic paravertebral block group (TPV group) and combined erector spinae and pecto-intercostal fascial plane blocks group (ES-PI group).

0.25% bupivacaine and 1 mg dexamethasone will be injected with different volumes in each block.

The first time to ask for rescue analgesia post-operatively will be measured. Using MedCalc Software version 14 (MedCalc Software bvba, Ostend, Belgium), 24 patients (12 patients per group) were calculated for a relative difference of 10% (0.635 hours) in the time to first analgesic request between both groups, with a study power of 95% and an alpha error of 0.05. This number will be increased to 30 patients (15 patients per group) to compensate for possible dropouts.

Analysis of data will be performed using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) software, version 21 for Microsoft Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, iL, USA). Categorical data will be reported as numbers and percentages and will be analyzed using the chi-squared test. Continuous data will be checked for normality using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Normally distributed data will be presented as means (standard deviations) and will be analyzed using the unpaired student t-test. Skewed data will be expressed as medians(quartiles) and will be analyzed using the Mann Whitney U test. For repeated measures, a two-way repeated measures ANOVA will be used to evaluate block (between-groups factor) and time (repeated measures)". Post-hoc pairwise comparison will be performed using the Bonferroni test. A P value of 0.05 or less will be considered significant.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 30
• Phase: Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Egypt
  • Kasr Al Aini
    • Cairo, Kasr Al Aini, Egypt, 2222
      • Kase Al Aini teaching hospital

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years to 60 years (Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• • 18-60 years of age

  • ASA I-II
  • Elective unilateral modified radical mastectomy with axillary lymph node dissection
  • Body weight (50-90 kg)

Exclusion Criteria:

• • Patient refusal

  • Known allergy to any of the study drugs
  • Bleeding disorders (platelets < 50 000, PC <60%, INR>1.5)
  • Infection at the site of needle puncture or sepsis
  • Obesity (BMI > 30 kg/m2)
  • Chronic opioid user eg; morphine addict
  • Chronic pain disease eg certain cancer patients, rheumatological disease
  • Inability to comprehend or use the numeric rating pain scoring system
  • Psychiatric illness eg, psychiatric patients on hypnotic treatment

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Double

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: TPVB (thoracic paravertebral block); TPVB will be performed in the sitting position A high frequency linear ultrasound probe will be applied in the parasagittal plane approximately 2-3 cm lateral to the midline till identification of the 3rd thoracic vertebra (T3) in the same side of surgery. Then the transducer will be moved progressively more medially until transverse processes are identified.The image acquired will have the transverse process located superiorly and an image of lower rib located inferiorly on the screen.The needle tip is to be observed to enter through the superior costotransverse ligament and loss of resistance sensation will be experienced. After confirming the anterior displacement of pleura with 2-3 mL of local anesthetic (LA), 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine and 4 mg dexamethasone will be administered for the block.	Drug: Bupivacaine Hydrochloride; We hypothesize that combined ESPB and PIPB are as effective as TPVB in controlling perioperative pain in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy (MRM) with lesser complications using bupivacaine hydrocloride; Other Names: marcaine; Drug: Dexamethasone phosphate; used as additive to bupivacaine; Other Names: decadrone
Experimental: ES-PI (erector spinae-pectointercostal block); ESPB In the second group (ES-PI) Using a high frequency linear ultrasound probe, it will be located in a longitudinal orientation at the level of T3 spinous process and then will be placed 3 cm laterally from the midline to the side involved in the surgery. .a 22-gauge block needle will be inserted in-plane at an angle of 30-40°. 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine hydrochloride and 3 mg dexamethasone will be injected in the plane deeper to the erector spinae muscle. PIPB While the patient is in the supine position, a high frequency linear probe will be placed parallel to the long axis of the sternum at a distance 2-3 cm from the attachment of the second rib and sternum to identify the Pectoralis major muscle, external intercostal muscles and the second rib in the superficial plane. by separation of fascial layers of between the external intercostal and the pectoralis muscles, a total of 10 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine and 1 mg dexamethasone will be injected.	Drug: Bupivacaine Hydrochloride; We hypothesize that combined ESPB and PIPB are as effective as TPVB in controlling perioperative pain in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy (MRM) with lesser complications using bupivacaine hydrocloride; Other Names: marcaine; Drug: Dexamethasone phosphate; used as additive to bupivacaine; Other Names: decadrone

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
The first time to ask for rescue analgesia post-operatively	after how many hours postoperatively the patient will ask for analgesia	48 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
The total postoperative opioid consumption (in the first 48 hrs)	total milligrams of opioid given to the patient in the 48 hours postoperatively	48 hours
NRS scores	Postoperative pain will be assessed, using numeric rating scale (NRS)	48 hours postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Kasr El Aini Hospital

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): March 12, 2021
• Primary Completion (Actual): March 9, 2023
• Study Completion (Actual): March 10, 2023

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: February 15, 2021
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: February 26, 2021
• First Posted (Actual): March 3, 2021

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): March 13, 2023
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 10, 2023
• Last Verified: March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Physiological Effects of Drugs; Central Nervous System Depressants; Autonomic Agents; Peripheral Nervous System Agents; Sensory System Agents; Anesthetics; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Antineoplastic Agents; Antiemetics; Gastrointestinal Agents; Glucocorticoids; Hormones; Hormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone Antagonists; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Anesthetics, Local; Dexamethasone; Bupivacaine; Dexamethasone 21-phosphate
• Other Study ID Numbers: MD-342-2020

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No