Fluoride Therapies on Hypersensitive Carious Lesions in Primary Teeth

May 5, 2021 updated by: University Medicine Greifswald

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Fluoride Therapies on Hypersensitive Carious Lesions in Primary Teeth

This observational cohort study aims to evaluate the short-term (3 months) efficacy of the standard fluoride therapy in the German National Health System for managing hypersensitive carious lesions in primary teeth (fluoride varnish application), and further compare it to a different fluoride therapy utilizing a silver-containing fluoride agent combined with potassium iodide solution.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A single trained investigator will screen for possible study participants of children aged 2-5 years old, and their parents will be asked to participate in the study. The participants will be consecutively recruited from regular clinic attendees of the Department of Preventive and Pediatric Dentistry at the University of Greifswald, from whom present with active carious lesions (ICDAS 5) along symptoms of hypersensitivity to be treated with fluoride varnish, and further compared to participants treated with silver fluoride and potassium iodide application.

Eligibility to the study will be determined by a single trained examiner through clinical findings of caries activity according to Bjørndal criteria, and reported history of hypersensitivity symptoms obtained from the parent/caregiver of the participant, followed by hypersensitivity confirmatory test using a triple syringe air blast on the exposed surface of the carious lesion to allocate areas with suspected dentin hypersensitivity.

After clinical examination and obtainment of an informed consent, eligible children will be treated with fluoride varnish application (Duraphat®), or silver fluoride and potassium iodide application (Riva Star®) according to manufacturer's instructions.The participant's behavior shall be evaluated at the beginning, during and after treatment. Plaque Index (API) and Papillary Bleeding Index (PBI) will also be assessed prior to treatment and at the 3-months mark. Procedures will be performed by six different dentists (four pediatric specialists and two post-graduate pediatric dentistry students), all of whom were briefed on the study protocol and received instructions in carrying in the interventions according to the manufacturer's guide, and their technical opinions regarding the performed procedures will be obtained following the procedure. Follow up examinations after 3 months will be done by a single examiner. Only one tooth per child will be included in the analysis.

Data and information of this study will be recorded, handled, and stored in an organized and secure way, to allow its accurate reporting, interpretation, and verification. To assure confidentiality of clinical records, an unambiguous subject identification code will be used. Patients who are no longer willing to continue in the study will have the right to quit at any time without any penalty.

All variables will be statistically analyzed using descriptive statistics, plots, and tests of normality. Means and standard deviations (SD) will be calculated for all quantitative variables, while frequencies and percentages will be calculated for categorical variables.

Comparison between the two study groups will utilize independent samples t-test for quantitative normally distributed variables, and Mann-Whitney U for quantitative non-normally distributed variables and qualitative ordinal variables. Chi-squared and Fisher exact tests will be performed for comparing qualitative nominal variables between the two study groups. Comparing the baseline and follow-up shall be done using paired t-test when the variable is normally distributed, and Wilcoxon signed rank test when the variable is not normally distributed. For comparing lesion activity before and after treatment, McNemar test will be used and Friedman test for comparing the children's behavior at 3 different time points (before, during and after treatment).

A Significance will be set at p<0.05. Data will be analyzed using IBM SPSS statistical software for windows (version 25).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Mecklenburg-Vorpommern
      • Greifswald, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany, 17475
        • The Department of Preventive and Pediatric Dentistry, University of Greifswald

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 5 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Reported hypersensitivity in primary teeth associated with the presence of active carious lesions (ICDAS 5).
  • Healthy children aged 2-5 years.
  • Not using any desensitizer for 1-month prior the study.
  • Willing to be examined.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previously restored teeth.
  • Teeth with signs or symptoms of irreversible pulpitis.
  • Patients with any systemic disease requiring special considerations during their dental treatment.
  • Parents/children who declined to participate in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Fluoride varnish (Duraphat®)
Fluoride varnish application is recommended by the German National Health System for managing hypersensitivity and dental caries. Sodium fluoride varnish (Duraphat®) will be applied on hypersensitive active carious lesions (ICDAS 5).
22,600 ppm sodium fluoride varnish will be applied on the surface of the affected hypersensitive active carious lesions.
Other Names:
  • Duraphat®
Experimental: Silver fluoride and potassium iodide (Riva Star®)
Silver fluoride and potassium iodide (Riva Star®) is primarily indicated for relieving hypersensitivity will be applied on hypersensitive active carious lesions (ICDAS 5) following isolation of the affected teeth and according to manufacturer's instructions.
38% silver fluoride will be applied to the surface of the isolated hypersensitive carious lesion followed by application of potassium iodide solution and according to manufacturer's instructions.
Other Names:
  • Riva Star®

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hypersensitivity pain relief
Time Frame: 3 Months
The degree of pain severity will be quantified by a visual analogue scale - VAS; 0-10, ranging across a continuum from none (0) to a severe amount of pain (10).
3 Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Activity of carious lesions
Time Frame: 3 Months

Lesions will be assessed for caries activity using visual tactile criteria (Bjørndal Criteria; 0 - 9= sound -missing tooth) 0. Sound

  1. Active lesion in enamel , without cavity ( bright surface with brown discoloration )
  2. Active cavity in enamel ( opaque enamel surface and loss of substance )
  3. Active cavity in enamel ( bright surface , brown discoloration, wet dentin )
  4. Inactive cavity in enamel ( bright surface, brown discoloration and loss of substance )
  5. Active cavity in enamel/dentin ( yellow or light brown discoloration , wet dentin )
  6. Inactive cavity in enamel/dentin ( dark brown discoloration, hard and dry dentin )
  7. Pulpal involvement or root stumps
  8. Filled tooth
  9. Missing tooth
3 Months
Patient Acceptance
Time Frame: Only at baseline (begining, during and after procedure)

Children's behavior before, during and after treatment was assessed using Frankl's Scale

  1. Definitely positive: Good rapport with the dentist, interested in the dental procedure, laughing and enjoying the situation
  2. Positive: Acceptance of treatment; at time cautious, willingness to comply with the dentist, at times with reservation but patient follows the dentist's directions cooperatively
  3. Negative: Reluctant to accept treatment; uncooperative, some evidence of negative attitude but not pronounced
  4. Definitely negative: Refusal of treatment, crying forcefully, fearful, or any other overt evidence of extreme negativism
Only at baseline (begining, during and after procedure)
Operating Dentists' Opinion About the Procedure Performed
Time Frame: Will be recorded immediately after the procedure
Dentist's technical opinion regarding the procedures and materials used in the study groups will be collected directly after performing the procedure using 5-point Likert scales.
Will be recorded immediately after the procedure

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
O'Leary Plaque Control Index
Time Frame: 3 Months

Visual assessment of plaque covered surfaces following application of a disclosing solution. The number of positively scored surfaces is divided by the total number of tooth surfaces evaluated, and the result is multiplied by 100 to express the index as a percentage

O'Leary Palque Index will be clinically evaluated prior to treatment and at the 3-months follow up visit.

3 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mohamed H Abudrya, BDS, MSc., The Department of Preventive and Pediatric Dentistry, University of Greifswald

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 13, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 4, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 15, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dentin Hypersensitivity

Clinical Trials on Sodium fluoride varnish (generic name; Duraphat®)

Subscribe