Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Angiography-derived IMR (CHART-MiCro)

March 28, 2021 updated by: Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital

Diagnostic Value of Angiography-derived Index of Microvascular Resistance in Coronary Artery Disease Patients and Its Prognostic Implication After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

The importance of the microvasculature in determining clinical outcomes has been highlighted in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). For patients with stable CAD, despite the success of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in relieving a stenosis in the epicardial coronary artery, microvascular dysfunction may preclude sufficient coronary flow and myocardial perfusion, possibly leading to worse clinical outcome. With the technical development of computational fluid dynamics, angiographic derivation of index of Index of Microcirculatory Resistance (IMR) without pressure wire, hyperemic agents, or theromdilution method is available as a potential alternative for pressure wire-derived IMR. In this regard, the current study will evaluate diagnostic implication of angiography-derived IMR and its prognostic implication after PCI in patients with stable CAD.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The importance of the microvasculature in determining clinical outcomes has been highlighted in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). For patients with stable CAD, despite the success of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in relieving a stenosis in the epicardial coronary artery, microvascular dysfunction may preclude sufficient coronary flow and myocardial perfusion, possibly leading to worse clinical outcome. With the technical development of computational fluid dynamics, angiographic derivation of IMR without pressure wire, hyperemic agents, or theromdilution method is available as a potential alternative for pressure wire-derived IMR. In this regard, the current study will evaluate diagnostic implication of angiography-derived IMR and its prognostic implication after PCI in patients with stable CAD.

This study cohorts consist with 3 separate cohort: first, internal diagnostic accuracy cohort, which will evaluate correlation between angiography-derived IMR and hyperemic microvascular resistance calculated using Cadmium-Zinc-Telluride Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (CZT-SPECT)-derived myocardial blood flow and invasively measured pressure data. For this, 53 consecutive patients with available CZT-SPECT within 3 months of measuring FFR in the left anterior descending coronary artery will be evaluated. Second: external diagnostic cohort, in which diagnostic accuracy of angiography-derived IMR will be assessed in patients with ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA) and normal controls, whose results were previously published (J Nucl Cardiol. 2020 Sep 30. doi: 10.1007/s12350-020-02252-8.) Among this cohort, 45 patients with no obstructive CAD and normal CZT-SPECT perfusion imaging will be regarded as normal controls, in 35 INOCA patients, vessels with normal corresponding perfusion territory will be regarded as internal control. Third, prognosis cohort, in which 138 consecutive CAD patients received PCI with available angiograms and who were suitable for angiographic fractional flow reserve and IMR measurement will be analyzed. Primary clinical outcome will be cardiac death or congestive heart failure at 2 years from index procedure. Secondary outcome will be any myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, definite or probable stent thrombosis, congestive heart failure admission and angina pectoris admission at 2 years from index procedure.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

271

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Shanghai, China, 200091
        • Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Wenliang Che, MD, PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Wenliang Che, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Diagnostic Accuracy Cohort, 53 stable CAD patients who underwent CZT-SPECT MBF and invasive pressure measurements in LAD within 7 days.

Diagnostic Accuracy Cohort, 35 INOCA patients confirmed by CZT-SPECT and coronary angiography and 45 normal controls Prognosis Cohort 138 stable patients received PCI with available angiograms and who were suitable for angiographic FFR and IMR measurement and have 28 months follow-up data.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • CAD patients with available CZT-SPECT within 3 months of measuring FFR in the left anterior descending coronary artery (Cohort 1)
  • INOCA patients and normal controls confirmed by CZT-SPECT and angiography (Cohort 2)
  • Stable CAD patients received PCI (Cohort 3)
  • analyzable angiograms at the index procedure

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous coronary artery bypass grafting
  • Chronic total occlusion patients
  • limited image quality of coronary angiography
  • Insufficient angiographic project for TIMI frame count
  • Severe tortuosity of target vessel
  • No optimal projection for reconstruction

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Internal Diagnostic Accuracy Cohort
Consecutive patients with available CZT-SPECT within 3 months of measuring FFR in the left anterior descending coronary artery. In these patients, correlation between angiography-derived IMR and hyperemic microvascular resistance will be assessed.

From coronary angiographic images, angiography-derived IMR will be calculated based on mathematical calculation.

Angiography-derived IMR = (hyperemic Pa x angiography-derived FFR) x (vessel length / {K x V diastole}).

Hyperemic Pa will be estimated from resting Pa according to prespecified equation.

Other Names:
  • Angio-IMR
  • CaIMR
External Diagnostic Accuracy Cohort
Patients are subgroup of previously published study (J Nucl Cardiol. 2020 Sep 30. doi: 10.1007/s12350-020-02252-8.), INOCA patients and normal controls confirmed by CZT-SPECT and angiography will be included for the assessment of angiography-derived IMR in diagnosing microvascular dysfunction.

From coronary angiographic images, angiography-derived IMR will be calculated based on mathematical calculation.

Angiography-derived IMR = (hyperemic Pa x angiography-derived FFR) x (vessel length / {K x V diastole}).

Hyperemic Pa will be estimated from resting Pa according to prespecified equation.

Other Names:
  • Angio-IMR
  • CaIMR
Prognosis Cohort
Prognosis cohort, in which angiography-derived IMR will be measured in the target vessel after successful revascularization. Those patients have follow-up data after 2 years from index procedure.

From coronary angiographic images, angiography-derived IMR will be calculated based on mathematical calculation.

Angiography-derived IMR = (hyperemic Pa x angiography-derived FFR) x (vessel length / {K x V diastole}).

Hyperemic Pa will be estimated from resting Pa according to prespecified equation.

Other Names:
  • Angio-IMR
  • CaIMR

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic accuracy
Time Frame: at the index procedure
Correlation between angiography-derived IMR and HMR
at the index procedure
Major adverse cardiac events
Time Frame: at 28 months from index procedure
Major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including cardiac death and readmission due to heart failure.
at 28 months from index procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
A composite of cardiac death, readmission due to heart failure and angina
Time Frame: at 28 months from index procedure
A composite of cardiac death, readmission due to heart failure and angina
at 28 months from index procedure
A composite of cardiac death, readmission due to heart failure, spontaneous MI, target vessel revascularization and angina
Time Frame: at 28 months from index procedure
A composite of cardiac death, readmission due to heart failure, spontaneous MI, target vessel revascularization and angina.
at 28 months from index procedure
Cardiac death
Time Frame: at 28 months from index procedure
Cardiac death
at 28 months from index procedure
Readmission due to heart failure
Time Frame: at 28 months from index procedure
Readmission due to heart failure
at 28 months from index procedure
Spontaneous MI
Time Frame: at 28 months from index procedure
Spontaneous MI
at 28 months from index procedure
Target vessel revascularization
Time Frame: at 28 months from index procedure
Target vessel revascularization
at 28 months from index procedure
Readmission due to angina
Time Frame: at 28 months from index procedure
Readmission due to angina
at 28 months from index procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

April 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 28, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ZS-20210328

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myocardial Ischemia

Clinical Trials on Angiography-drived Index of Microcirculatory Resistance

3
Subscribe