Promoting Resilience in Stroke Survivor-carepartner Dyads (ReStoreD) (ReStoreD)

January 28, 2026 updated by: Alexandra Terrill, University of Utah

Testing Efficacy of an Intervention to Promote Resilience in Stroke Survivor-carepartner Dyads (ReStoreD)

Affecting nearly 800,000 people in the US every year, stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability, and has serious consequences for stroke survivors and their carepartners. Our project uses a scientifically rigorous efficacy study to evaluate a remotely delivered 8-week dyadic (couples-based) positive psychology intervention to reduce emotional distress in stroke survivors and their carepartners. If successful, couples may be better emotionally equipped to cope with the sequelae of stroke, and have better rehabilitation outcomes and quality of life.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The impact of stroke is shared between the stroke survivor and their spousal/partner caregiver (carepartner). An estimated 30-50% of stroke survivors and carepartners experience depressive or anxiety symptoms that negatively affect rehabilitation outcomes and quality of life. Yet, interventions to support couples post-stroke are largely insufficient or inaccessible. To address this need, we developed a novel remotely-delivered dyadic intervention to promote Resilience in Stroke survivor-carepartner Dyads (ReStoreD), in which couples learn and practice goal-setting, communication strategies, and positive psychology activities like expressing gratitude, finding meaning, and fostering connections. Preliminary pilot study results were promising, showing reduced depressive symptoms and increased resilience in participants. The purpose of the current study is to conduct a Stage II efficacy trial of the 8-week ReStoreD intervention with a sample of 200 dyads (n=400) consisting of one individual who has sustained an ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke between 3 months and 3 years prior to enrollment and a cohabitating carepartner. Using a fully-powered, randomized waitlist-control design, we will determine efficacy of ReStoreD to reduce emotional distress in both dyad members (Aim 1). We will also examine effects of ReStoreD on secondary outcomes (resilience, relationship quality, stress-related stroke, meaningful activity engagement) as potential mediators (Aim 2), and explore moderators to determine whether certain subgroups respond better to the intervention (Aim 3). All participants will complete standardized, validated assessments at baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks, and 6-month follow up. All aspects of the study, including intervention activities and assessments, are conducted remotely, online.

This is the first rigorously designed efficacy trial to test a positive psychology intervention for stroke survivors and their carepartners. When the aims of this study are realized, we will 1) have a remotely-delivered, dyadic intervention to support couples post-stroke; 2) have a better understanding of the mechanisms involved in the intervention's effect on emotional distress, and can use this information to inform future interventions; and 3) be able to identify a more specific target population for whom the intervention works best. Ultimately, if found efficacious, this intervention will offer sustainable and accessible support for couples who are coping with stroke to improve rehabilitation outcomes and quality of life.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

400

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84108
        • University of Utah

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Community-dwelling cohabitating couple where one partner has a had an ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke
  • The stroke must have occurred between 3 months and 3 years prior to enrollment
  • The adult couple must have been living together since before the stroke and for at least 6 months prior to enrollment
  • One or both partners must report some anxiety and/or depressive symptoms
  • Participants must be able to read, understand, and follow instructions, and be able to provide their own consent

Exclusion Criteria:

• Either dyad partner has significant aphasia (difficulties with speech), visual, psychiatric, and/or significant cognitive impairment that would limit their ability to participate in the intervention in a meaningful way

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ReStoreD
8-week intervention that is remotely delivered, consisting of psychoeducation and positive psychology activities. Participants complete two activities individually and two together each week.
ReStoreD is a remotely-administered behavioral intervention in which couples coping with stroke learn and practice goal-setting, communication strategies, and positive psychology activities, such as expressing gratitude, finding meaning, and fostering connections. Participants are provided with 8 weekly modules, each featuring two components: 1) psychoeducational materials, such as an informational video and resources/links about a general topic related to resilience, coping, and/or overall well-being of the individual and couple, and 2) examples of positive psychology activities that relate to the week's theme or topic. Participants are asked to complete at least two positive psychology activities alone and two together each week.
No Intervention: Waitlist-control
Participants will be waitlisted for 8 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PROMIS Emotional Distress, Anxiety and Depression Scale-Short Form
Time Frame: Baseline
8-item self-report measure of depression (4 items) and anxiety (4 items); higher scores indicate more emotional distress
Baseline
PROMIS Emotional Distress, Anxiety and Depression Scale-Short Form
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8-item self-report measure of depression (4 items) and anxiety (4 items); higher scores indicate more emotional distress
8 weeks
PROMIS Emotional Distress, Anxiety and Depression Scale-Short Form
Time Frame: 16 weeks
8-item self-report measure of depression (4 items) and anxiety (4 items); higher scores indicate more emotional distress
16 weeks
PROMIS Emotional Distress, Anxiety and Depression Scale-Short Form
Time Frame: 6 months
8-item self-report measure of depression (4 items) and anxiety (4 items); higher scores indicate more emotional distress
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC)
Time Frame: baseline
10-item self-report measure of resilience; higher scores indicate greater resilience
baseline
Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC)
Time Frame: 8 weeks
10-item self-report measure of resilience; higher scores indicate greater resilience
8 weeks
Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC)
Time Frame: 16 weeks
10-item self-report measure of resilience; higher scores indicate greater resilience
16 weeks
Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC)
Time Frame: 6 months
10-item self-report measure of resilience; higher scores indicate greater resilience
6 months
Dyadic Coping Inventory (DCI)-short
Time Frame: baseline
11-item self-report measure of how well the couple copes with stress; higher scores indicate better coping
baseline
Dyadic Coping Inventory (DCI)-short
Time Frame: 8 weeks
11-item self-report measure of how well the couple copes with stress; higher scores indicate better coping
8 weeks
Dyadic Coping Inventory (DCI)-short
Time Frame: 16 weeks
11-item self-report measure of how well the couple copes with stress; higher scores indicate better coping
16 weeks
Dyadic Coping Inventory (DCI)-short
Time Frame: 6 months
11-item self-report measure of how well the couple copes with stress; higher scores indicate better coping
6 months
Dyadic Relationship Scale
Time Frame: baseline
Self report measure that assesses care-recipient-caregiver relationship and includes 2 subscales: Dyadic Strain (5 items; higher scores mean more strain) and Positive Dyadic Interactions (6 items; higher scores mean more positive interactions)
baseline
Dyadic Relationship Scale
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Self report measure that assesses care-recipient-caregiver relationship and includes 2 subscales: Dyadic Strain (5 items; higher scores mean more strain) and Positive Dyadic Interactions (6 items; higher scores mean more positive interactions)
8 weeks
Dyadic Relationship Scale
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Self report measure that assesses care-recipient-caregiver relationship and includes 2 subscales: Dyadic Strain (5 items; higher scores mean more strain) and Positive Dyadic Interactions (6 items; higher scores mean more positive interactions)
16 weeks
Dyadic Relationship Scale
Time Frame: 6 months
Self report measure that assesses care-recipient-caregiver relationship and includes 2 subscales: Dyadic Strain (5 items; higher scores mean more strain) and Positive Dyadic Interactions (6 items; higher scores mean more positive interactions)
6 months
PROMIS-Psychosocial Illness Impact Scale-short form
Time Frame: baseline
8-item self report measure on stroke-related stress (completed by person with stroke only); higher scores indicate greater negative impact/more stress.
baseline
PROMIS-Psychosocial Illness Impact Scale-short form
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8-item self report measure on stroke-related stress (completed by person with stroke only); higher scores indicate greater negative impact/more stress.
8 weeks
PROMIS-Psychosocial Illness Impact Scale-short form
Time Frame: 16 weeks
8-item self report measure on stroke-related stress (completed by person with stroke only); higher scores indicate greater negative impact/more stress.
16 weeks
PROMIS-Psychosocial Illness Impact Scale-short form
Time Frame: 6-months
8-item self report measure on stroke-related stress (completed by person with stroke only); higher scores indicate greater negative impact/more stress.
6-months
Zarit Burden Inventory-Short
Time Frame: baseline
12 item self-report measure on caregiving related stress/burden (completed by partner only); higher scores indicate more burden
baseline
Zarit Burden Inventory-Short
Time Frame: 8 weeks
12 item self-report measure on caregiving related stress/burden (completed by partner only); higher scores indicate more burden
8 weeks
Zarit Burden Inventory-Short
Time Frame: 16 weeks
12 item self-report measure on caregiving related stress/burden (completed by partner only); higher scores indicate more burden
16 weeks
Zarit Burden Inventory-Short
Time Frame: 6 months
12 item self-report measure on caregiving related stress/burden (completed by partner only); higher scores indicate more burden
6 months
Meaningful Activity Participation Assessment (MAPA)
Time Frame: baseline
28 activity items are rated on frequency of engaging in these activities (higher score means more frequent) and how meaningful they are to the person (higher score means more meaningful)
baseline
Meaningful Activity Participation Assessment (MAPA)
Time Frame: 8 weeks
28 activity items are rated on frequency of engaging in these activities (higher score means more frequent) and how meaningful they are to the person (higher score means more meaningful)
8 weeks
Meaningful Activity Participation Assessment (MAPA)
Time Frame: 16 weeks
28 activity items are rated on frequency of engaging in these activities (higher score means more frequent) and how meaningful they are to the person (higher score means more meaningful)
16 weeks
Meaningful Activity Participation Assessment (MAPA)
Time Frame: 6 months
28 activity items are rated on frequency of engaging in these activities (higher score means more frequent) and how meaningful they are to the person (higher score means more meaningful)
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alexandra L Terrill, PhD, University of Utah

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 20, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 12, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 15, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 30, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on ReStoreD

Subscribe