Genome Sequencing in the Intensive Care Unit Population (PISCES)

January 7, 2026 updated by: Jerry Vockley, MD, PhD
The purpose of this study is to understand how the use of whole genome sequencing (WGS) may be able to increase the speed with which a diagnosis is made for patients in an intensive care unit population. This is not an assessment of a new device, test, or technology. This project is an investigation of the utility of this technology in clinical care when compared to standard of care testing. The study will look at the ability to more quickly diagnose a patient (time to diagnosis and efficacy of testing) as compared to standard of care testing. The study will also look at the impact of WGS on patient outcomes and cost of clinical care.

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Detailed Description

This is an observational study to understand if the use of whole genome sequencing (WGS) increases the speed to diagnosis and how clinical management is changed in an intensive care population of neonates. This project utilizes approved genome sequencing methods at CLIA-certified facilities.

  1. Neonate subjects who are eligible and whose parents consent to the study will undergo blood sample which will be sent for WGS and bioinformatics analysis, filtering first with a targeted panel of 1722 genes most likely to cause genetic disorders in the first year of life, and then with a whole exome filter if no obvious diagnosis is determined using the 1722 gene panel filter. Testing is completed in a CLIA-certified laboratory. Pathogenic, likely-pathogenic, and variants of uncertain significance in genes related the child's clinical features will be returned to the care team and to the parents in the setting of genetic counseling for use in clinical decision making about management. A report is added to the neonates EMR. Consent will include permission to access financial records of the hospitalization, to compare costs and length-of-stay to matched controls.
  2. Parents of identified neonates who consent to the study for the for the purpose of trio analysis will have samples collected which will undergo concurrent analysis with the child to assist in determining the pathogenicity of variants in genomic sequencing. Pathogenic and likely-pathogenic secondary findings in the ACMG 59 later-onset medically actionable genes will be reported to the parents in the setting of genetic counseling ONLY if the parents opt in to learn these results AND they are identified in the child.
  3. Siblings of participating neonates, if needed for interpretation of the neonate's genetic studies, will have samples collected for use in the genetic analysis. Pathogenic and likely-pathogenic results in childhood-onset disorders will be reported to the parents in the setting of genetic counseling.
  4. Historical controls will be identified and matched to study participants. Historical controls will include infants in the ICU having a genetics consult ordered during their initial admission over the prior 24 months. Matching between study participants and matched controls will be performed using Propensity Scores. We will fit a logistical regression model to the combined treatment and control groups, and will then use the nearest neighbor matching to create matched pairs. The matching will help reduce bias and increase power to detect true effects. These controls will only be used for the fiscal and length of stay analyses; no genetic testing will be done on this cohort.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

400

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15224
        • UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 2 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Neonates: In order to be approached to participate, a neonate must meet all of the following criteria:

    1. Greater than 24 weeks gestational age
    2. Birth weight greater than 600 grams
    3. Admitted to the intensive care unit at UPMC Children's Hospital (CHP) and/or Magee Women's Hospital
    4. Possibility of a genetic disorder based on signs, symptoms, and laboratory values triggering a formal clinical medical genetics consult by the clinical care team.
    5. Triaged by PI or attending co-investigators and prioritized to introduction of this research study based on patient-specific clinical concerns
    6. Documented informed consent from parent/guardian
  • Parents: Parent of a neonate who meets the above inclusion criteria and who has been consented to participate in the study.
  • Siblings: Siblings of a neonate who meets the above inclusion criteria and who has been consented to participate in the study. Siblings will only be recruited if their participation has been determined to be essential to the accurate interpretation of the neonate's genetic studies.
  • Historical Controls: Individuals who have been evaluated by Medical Genetics within the last 24 months and who meet the criteria for matched controls as defined by propensity score matching.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neonates: An individual who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participating in this study:

    1. Has a known etiologic diagnosis (e.g. prenatal testing)
    2. Has a major congenital anomaly (renal, cardiac, hepatic, neurological, or pulmonary malformations) associated with a chromosomal anomaly detected on prenatal testing (e.g. ultrasound, genetic testing)
    3. Sequencing sent after birth for any other reason than the genetics consult that triggers the study
    4. Presence of documented significant congenital infection (e.g. congenital cytomegalovirus)
  • Parents:

    1. Is not the biological parent of the identified neonate
    2. There is no exclusion for parent participation. If the parent is less than 18 years of age, however, these individuals will be asked to assent to the study and their parent(s) will be asked to provide permission/consent for the minor parent's participation
    3. Having had previous genetic testing does not exclude the parent from participating in this study.
  • Siblings:

    1. Is not a biological sibling of a neonate who meets the inclusion criteria
    2. Is not require for accurate interpretation of neonate results
    3. Having had previous genetic testing does not exclude the sibling from participating in this study.
  • Historical Control: Has not been seen within the past 24 months and/or does not meet the criteria for matched control as defined by propensity score matching. Part of this matching requires that the historical control be matched to a study participant based on age, thus they will be selected based on all matching criteria and will be excluded if they do not meet the criteria, including age.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Neonate WGS Testing
Neonate subjects who are eligible and whose parents consent to study will undergo blood sampling which will be sent for whole genome sequencing and bioinformatics analysis, filtering first a targeted panel of 1722 genes most likely to cause genetic disorders in the first year of life, and then with a whole exome filter if no obvious diagnosis is determined using the 1722 gene panel filter.

Neonates will undergo whole genome sequencing, and analysis with a targeted panel of genes likely to cause genetic disorders in the first year of life. If no diagnosis is identified, sequenced data will be analyzed using a whole exome filter. Performed in a CLIA-certified lab. Pathogenic, likely pathogenic, and VUS in genes related to the phenotype will be returned to the care team and family.

Parents will be enrolled for the purpose of trio analysis with the child to assist in determining the pathogenicity of variants in genomic sequencing. Pathogenic and likely-pathogenic findings will be reported to the parents in the setting of genetic counseling.

Sibling will be enrolled and have samples collected for use in the genetic analysis only if deemed essential. Results will be reported to the parents in the setting of genetic counseling.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Confirmed Diagnosis
Time Frame: Up to 4 years
Categorical Y/N confirmed diagnosis in the neonate participant detected with WGS, compared to results from standard of care (SOC) or as seen in the historical control (HC)
Up to 4 years
Diagnostic Rate
Time Frame: Up to 4 years
Diagnostic rate with analysis via WGS, the 1722 neonatal specific gene filter, vs whole exome filter
Up to 4 years
Time to Diagnosis
Time Frame: Up to 4 years
Time to diagnosis in days with WGS as compared to SOC testing or HC
Up to 4 years
Clinical Utility of WGS
Time Frame: Up to 4 years
Clinical utility of WGS (e.g. changes in care management) compared to SOC or HC. Clinical utility is rated by a physician involved with case following the return of results using a Likert scale (1 - Not Useful at all, 2 - Not Very Useful, 3 - Neutral, 4 - Useful, 5 - Very Useful)
Up to 4 years
Care Cost Evaluation
Time Frame: Up to 4 years
Total care cost in dollars in those receiving WGS as compared to HC
Up to 4 years
Length of Stay
Time Frame: Up to 4 years
Total length of hospital stay in days in those receiving WGS as compared to HC
Up to 4 years
Need for Medical Utilization
Time Frame: Up to 4 years
Number of major medical procedures, imaging studies, or consulting services encounters in subjects receiving WGS compared to those in HC
Up to 4 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gerard Vockley, MD, PhD, University of Pittsburgh

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 13, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 13, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 19, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 9, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Genetic Disease

Clinical Trials on Neonate WGS Testing

Subscribe