Genetic Counseling Service Delivery and Outcomes in Diverse and Underserved Populations

January 8, 2024 updated by: Sara Pirzadeh-Miller, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

This 2-arm prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial compared outcomes of telephone genetic counseling (intervention) versus in-person genetic counseling (control) in an underserved, multilingual patient population referred for cancer genetic counseling at two North Texas safety-net hospitals.

The main question[s] it aims to answer are:

  • Is telephone genetic counseling equal to in-person genetic counseling in the patient reported outcomes? Cancer genetics knowledge, attitude towards GT, and informed choice as well as GC-specific empowerment.
  • Is telephone genetic counseling-based clinical outcomes the same as in-person genetic counseling for visit completion and testing rates? Participants will be randomized to either in-person or telephone genetic counseling arm and complete standard of care genetic counseling visit process where testing is offered. Both arms will complete a series of surveys to assess the outcomes of interest.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The overarching goal of this pilot prospective randomized controlled study is to compare patient-reported and clinical operations outcomes between in-person genetic counseling (IPGC - control) and telephone-based genetic counseling (TGC - intervention) in an indigent English or Spanish-speaking population seeking genetic counseling for hereditary cancer syndromes to create a framework for effective and efficient genetic service delivery in these populations nationally. General genetic education and principles will be conveyed through a standard genetic counseling session including a pre-test education video in both the TGC and IPGC arms. Our primary project objectives are to compare the following outcomes between the IPGC and TGC study arms. Aim 1: Patient reported outcomes - A. Patient satisfaction with genetic counseling visit; B. Knowledge of basic principles of cancer genetics and implications of genetic testing for personal healthcare and relatives. Secondary objectives for this aim are: 1. Patient ability to make informed choice; and 2. Genetic counseling-specific empowerment outcomes. Aim 2: Clinical outcomes - visit completion rate; Secondary objectives are: 1. Genetic testing completion rate; and 2. Genetic testing cancelation/failure rate. We hypothesize that patients in the TGC arm will not have significant differences in knowledge, satisfaction, informed choice or genetic counseling-specific empowerment compared to the IPGC arm. We also expect significantly increased visit completion rate and lower test completion rate in the TGC arm compared to the IPGC arm, but no significant difference in sample failure rate.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

201

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390
        • Parkland Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are English or Spanish-speaking adults (18 years and older) already scheduled for cancer genetic counseling. Participants must either be uninsured or have Medicaid, and they must not have previously had germline genetic testing or cancer genetic counseling. Participants must have a working telephone number and valid e-mail address. Internet access is a requirement to complete electronic study surveys, receive study-related documents electronically.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients referred for surgical planning pending genetic test results. Minors (under age 18 years). Pregnant women. Decisionally impaired. Students/ residents. Patients who do not speak English or Spanish. Prisoners. Individuals without working telephone number and valid e-mail address or internet access.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: In-person genetic counseling
Patients referred for standard of cancer genetic counseling are seen in-person with a genetic counselor for service.
Active Comparator: Telephone genetic counseling
Patients referred for standard of cancer genetic counseling are on the telephone with a genetic counselor for service.
genetic counseling service delivered audio-only
Other Names:
  • service delivery type

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient reported outcome
Time Frame: Survey administered within 7 days of visit
Service satisfaction
Survey administered within 7 days of visit
Patient reported outcome
Time Frame: Survey administered within 7 days of visit
Genetic knowledge
Survey administered within 7 days of visit
Clinical outcome
Time Frame: Completion of visit on scheduled date
Genetic counseling visit completion rate
Completion of visit on scheduled date

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient reported outcome
Time Frame: Survey administered within 7 days of visit
Informed choice for genetic testing
Survey administered within 7 days of visit
Clinical outcome
Time Frame: Testing must be complete within 90 days of visit
Genetic testing completion rate
Testing must be complete within 90 days of visit
Clinical outcome
Time Frame: Within 90 days of visit
Genetic test sample failure/cancelation rate
Within 90 days of visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sara Pirzadeh-Miller, M.S., UT Southwestern Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 20, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 8, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

January 18, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Genetic Predisposition

Clinical Trials on Telephone genetic counseling

3
Subscribe