Shared Decision Making in Surveillance for Distant Metastasis in Breast Cancer (SMART-FU)

May 30, 2023 updated by: Hyeong-Gon Moon, Seoul National University Hospital

Shared Decision Making in Follow-up Imaging Surveillance for Distant Metastasis in Treated Breast Cancer Patients [SMART-FU]: A Prospective, Single-institution, Randomized Pragmatic Trial

In this study, clinical impacts of shared decision making between physicians and patients in strategy of surveillance for asymptomatic patients who ended the primary treatments on quality of life would be investigated

Study Overview

Detailed Description

[Background]

  1. Shared decision making between patients and physicians when breast cancer patients encounter decision making in the initial treatment process has already been included in the recommendations for breast cancer treatment in each country. However, in the follow-up stage using various imaging tests after the initial breast cancer treatment, the evidence of decision making is very poor and the patient who understands this well and actively participates in the process of deciding the follow-up strategy are almost none.
  2. Major guidelines including NCCN, ASCO and ESMO recommend surveillance with routine imaging such as sonography and mammography, and does not recommend advanced imaging tests for asymptomatic patients. These guidelines are based on two prospective randomized trials conducted in 1994. Despite many international medical recommendations, many institutions around the world are increasingly using distant metastasis tests in belief of improving the survival rate through early detection of distant metastasis and of improving the emotional stability of doctors and patients.
  3. In this study, clinical impacts of shared decision making in strategy of surveillance for asymptomatic patients on quality of life would be investigated by prospective randomized pragmatic trial. Additionally, oncological results would be analyzed and real world data of patients preference would be gathered

[Study design] Prospective, single-institutional, randomized pragmatic trial

[Statistical considerations] With 5% significance level and 90% power, 132 patients are needed in each group. Assuming a 28% drop out rate, 368 patients need to be recruited.

[Randomizations] Web-based randomization would be conducted stratified to subtypes.

[Objectives]

  1. Primary objective

    - QoL (when enrollment, after 1 and 2 year - FACT-B score)

  2. Secondary objectives

    • Depression - anxiety scale (HADS score)
    • Recurrence-free survival
    • Patients' preference for surveillance in SDM group
    • Cross over rate in SDM group

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

368

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women between 20-70 years
  • Invasive unilateral breast carcinoma with histological confirmation
  • History of invasive breast cancer
  • TMN stage I-II according to AJCC 7th
  • Histologically or radiologically no suspicion of distant metastases
  • Performance status corresponding to ECOG grade 0-2
  • No psychological and geographical restriction in follow-up
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of any cancer in the previous 5 years
  • Bilateral breast cancer
  • Male breast cancer
  • Patients who are planning for surveillance in other institutions
  • Unable to understand and fill out questionnaires

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Shared decision making group
The Study arm - shared decision making when deciding surveillance strategy
Shared decision making and decide surveillance strategy between "standard follow-up according to the institutional practice and decide what to do advanced imagings for surveillance" and "guideline-based surveillance"
Other: Usual surveillance group
The control arm - surveillance with usual care
standard follow-up according to the institutional practice

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of life (QoL)
Time Frame: At the point of enrollment
Evaluated QoL with Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast (FACT-B) questionnaire
At the point of enrollment
Quality of life (QoL)
Time Frame: After 1 year of enrollment
Evaluated QoL with Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast (FACT-B) questionnaire
After 1 year of enrollment
Quality of life (QoL)
Time Frame: After 2 year of enrollment
Evaluated QoL with Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast (FACT-B) questionnaire
After 2 year of enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Depression-anxiety scale
Time Frame: At the point of enrollment, after 1 year and 2 years
Evaluated with Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) questionnaire
At the point of enrollment, after 1 year and 2 years
Recurrence-free survival (RFS)
Time Frame: 3 years
Evaluated locoregional / distant metastasis free-survival
3 years
Rate of patients who choose guideline-dependent surveillance rather than advanced imaging-dependent in SDM group
Time Frame: 3 years
Rate of patients who choose guideline-dependent surveillance in SDM group (Patients' preference for surveillance)
3 years
Cross over rate in SDM group
Time Frame: 3 years
Evaluated Patients' cross-over rate in SDM group
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hyeong-Gon Moon, Seoul National University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 6, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 18, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 27, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 31, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 30, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2012-090-1182

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on Shared decision making

3
Subscribe