- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04880824
Analysis of Frailty Syndrome Within the Framework of the Innovation Fund Project PRÄP-GO (ANA-PRÄP-GO)
Analysis of the Pathophysiology of Frailty Syndrome and Clinical Development of Frailty Within the Framework of the Innovation Fund Project PRÄP-GO (ANA-PRÄP-GO)
The patients included in PRÄP-GO and the corresponding comparison cohorts will be offered to participate in this complementary study in order to be able to carry out a detailed characterization and phenotyping of the frailty complex.
Amendment vote of 08/05/2024: Recruitment extension of Non-frail surgical control group (NFC cohort) until August 31, 2025.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
As part of the innovation fund project PRÄP-GO (EA1/225/19), a multimodal intervention is being conducted in patients with a frailty syndrome. However, the health care research project is limited to evaluating clinical issues only. In order to be able to research further pathophysiological, clinical, psychosocial and work-organizational connections, different groups of participants will be offered the participation in this scientific support program of PRÄP-GO.
The groups of participants in this accompanying program ANA-PRÄP-GO are:
- Randomized study patients with a frailty syndrome of the intervention study PRÄP-GO (PG cohort)
- Non-frail surgical control group (NFC cohort)
- Non-surgical comparison group (NO cohort)
- Participants with health professions (GB cohort)
Additionally, relatives of the patients can be included.
Subprojects are included to reflect research questions of interest in sub groups:
- Success of endoprosthetic implants (clinical outcome and gait pattern after total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty in frail patients)
- Functional treatment outcome and health-related quality of life after elective spinal surgery in the PG cohort, in the NFC cohort, and in the NO cohort
- Hemodynamic evaluation in patients of the PG and NFC cohort with preoperative abnormal cardiovascular function
- Establishment of a German standard database for 14 CANTAB tests by CANTAB Connect technology
- Aggregated evaluation of the cognitive data of different surgical cohorts from studies carried out at the department of anesthesiology to describe domain-specific changes in the perioperative course
- Perspectives of different health professional groups regarding barriers and facilitators in the implementation of a prehabilitation program and necessary changes in skill, organizational and management, and communication in an interdisciplinary setting
- Perspectives of patients and significant others regarding the organizational pathway of the prehabilitation program
- Frequency, pathophysiology and trajectory of muscle weakness as well as functional impairments of patients admitted to intensive care units of the PG and NFC cohort and their long-term outcomes.
- The gut microbiome as a potential risk factor for perioperative neurocognitive disorders (PNDs) in the elderly
- Evaluation of nutrition data in all cohorts (e.g. adherence to mediterranean diet, nutrition habits, nutritional status, dental status etc.)
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Berlin, Germany, 13353
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité - University Medicine
-
Berlin, Germany, 13589
- Paul Gerhard Diakonie - Evangelisches Waldkrankenhaus Spandau
-
Berlin, Germany, 14129
- Paul Gerhard Diakonie - Evangelisches Krankenhaus Hubertus
-
Berlin, Germany, 14193
- Paul Gerhard Diakonie - Martin-Luther-Krankenhaus
-
Berlin, Germany
- Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin
-
Berlin, Germany
- Auguste-Viktoria-Klinikum - Vivantes - Netzwerk für Gesundheit GmbH
-
Berlin, Germany
- CARITAS Klinik Maria Heimsuchung
-
Berlin, Germany
- Dominikus-Krankenhaus
-
Berlin, Germany
- Humboldt-Klinikum - Vivantes - Netzwerk für Gesundheit GmbH
-
Berlin, Germany
- Klinikum im Friedrichshain - Vivantes - Netzwerk für Gesundheit GmbH
-
Berlin, Germany, 10117
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Physical Medicine
-
Berlin, Germany, 12163
- Praxis Landgraf
-
Berlin, Germany, 12203
- Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine (CBF)
-
Berlin, Germany
- Sankt Jospeph Krankenhaus
-
Berlin, Germany
- Universitätsklinikum Mannheim GmbH
-
Berlin, Germany
- Wenckebach-Klinikum - Vivantes - Netzwerk für Gesundheit GmbH
-
Cottbus, Germany
- Carl-Thiem-Klinikum
-
Eberswalde, Germany
- Werner Forßmann-Krankenhaus
-
Frankfurt (Oder), Germany
- Klinikum Frankfurt Oder GmbH
-
Hamburg, Germany
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
-
Harburg, Germany
- Asklepios Klinikum Harburg
-
Kremmen, Germany
- Sana Kliniken Sommerfeld
-
Lübeck, Germany
- Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Universität zu Lübeck
-
München, Germany
- Munchen Klinik Bogenhausen
-
München, Germany
- Klinikum der Universität München, LMU Campus Großhadern
-
München, Germany
- Klinikum rechts der Isar - Technische Universität München
-
-
Brandenburg
-
Schwante, Brandenburg, Germany, 16727
- Praxis Prof. Dr med. Ulrich Schwantes
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
The groups of participants in this scientific accompanying program ANA-PRÄP-GO are:
- Randomized study patients with a frailty syndrome of the intervention study PRÄP-GO (PG cohort)
- Non-frail surgical control group (NFC cohort)
- Non-surgical comparison group (NO cohort)
- Participants with health professions (GB cohort)
- Relatives of the included patients
Description
PG cohort:
Inclusion criteria
- Consent given and inclusion in PRÄP-GO
- Patient capable of giving consent or existing legal guardian in the case of patients not capable of giving consent
Exclusion criteria
- None
NFC cohort:
Inclusion criteria
- Patient capable of giving consent or existing legal guardian in the case of patients not capable of giving consent
- Age ≥ 70 years
- Elective surgery planned
- Expected anesthesia duration> 60 min
- No frailty syndrome (0 positive out of 5 standardized parameters) according to the physical frailty phenotype (Fried et al., 2001)
Exclusion criteria
- Severe cardiac or pulmonary disease (NYHA IV, Gold IV)
- Intracranial interventions
- Moribund patients (palliative situation)
- Patients with a neuropsychiatric clinical picture or severe hearing and / or visual acuity impairment (not compensated by visual or hearing aids), which limit the performance of the neurocognitive tests
- Insufficient language skills
- Participation in another interventional rehabilitation study or a study according to the German Drug Law or the medical Device Law that has not been approved by the study leader (Exception: parallel participation in adjuvant therapy study).
NO cohort:
Inclusion criteria
- Age ≥ 70 years
- No elective surgery planned
- No surgery within 6 months prior to study enrollment
Exclusion criteria - See NFC cohort
GB cohort:
Inclusion criterion
- Doctor, nurse or therapist from the cooperation partners of PRAEP-GO who were involved in the project
Exclusion criterion
- Language barrier
Relatives:
Inclusion criteria
- Member of a patient in the PRÄP-GO cohort
- Age ≥ 18 years
Exclusion criterion
- Language barrier
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
PG cohort
800 randomized surgical study patients with a frailty syndrome (Pre-frail and frail) of the intervention study PRÄP-GO (PG cohort).
400 study patients receive the intervention and 400 study patients receive standard of care.
|
The participants in the intervention group take part in a shared decision-making (SDM) conference to plan the intervention.
The therapeutic content of the prehabilitation is defined individually for each patient in the SDM conference.
Prehabilitation will be a structured and individually tailored 3-week program.
|
|
NFC cohort
400 non-frail surgical control group (NFC cohort)
|
|
|
NO cohort
300 non-operative control group (NO cohort)
|
|
|
GB cohort
Skill-Change-Management: a maximum of 30 coworkers and analysis of guiding principle: to a maximum of 35 patients, 30 relatives and 45 coworkers
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Frailty
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Frequency of frailty is measured by modified Fried criteria (category 1 +2 = pre-frail, category 3 -5 = frail)
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Neuro-cognitive disorder (NCD)
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Frequency of neuro-cognitive disorder (mild / major NCD)
|
Up to 1 year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Delirium days
Time Frame: During the hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
|
The duration of delirium is measured in days.
|
During the hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
|
|
COVID-19
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
SARS-CoV-2 infection
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Cardiovascular function 1
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Cardiovascular function is measured by Transesophageal Echocardiography.
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Cardiovascular function 2
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Cardiovascular function is measured by cardiovascular complications.
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Ethical aspects
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Wishes of the patient about the intensity of therapy and therapy goals are measured with a questionnaire.
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Patient satisfaction score is measured with a likert scale (0 - 10)
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Patient-related outcome measures (PROMS)
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Different tools and questionnaires are combined to measure Patient-related outcome.
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Patient-related experience measures (PREMS)
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Patient-reported experiences of health care are measured with a questionnaire.
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Findings of Memory consultation
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
During memory consultation cognitive diagnostic findings are measured.
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Stress
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Stress is measured by Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ20), which ranges from 20-80 points
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Anxiety 1
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Anxiety is measured by Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7, points range from 0-21
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Anxiety 2
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Anxiety 2 is measured by Faces Anxiety Scale, a valid single-item for self-report measure of state
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Demand of health services
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
The need of treatment for curing an illness.
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Adverse events
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Adverse events are measured in all participants, who receive study measurements
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Sarcopenia
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
The composite outcome measure "Sarcopenia" is defined by the following three criteria: 1) low muscle strength (hand grip strength), 2) low muscle quantity (calf circumference and 3) low physical performance (gait speed).
Criterion (1) identifies probable sarcopenia, additional documentation of criterion (2) confirms sarcopenia diagnosis, and if all criteria (1), (2) and (3) are met, sarcopenia is considered severe.
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Calf circumference
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Calf circumference is measured in a standardized position and documented in centimeter.
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Arm circumference
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Arm circumference is measured in a standardized position and documented in centimeter.
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Dental status
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
(number of teeth, Oral Health Assessment Tool (OHAT), Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GO-HAI), questions regarding prothesis, dentist visits and dental care)
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Quality of life
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Quality of life is measured by Care Related Quality of Life (CarerQoL)
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Postoperative complications
Time Frame: Up to 30 days
|
Complications are measured according to the Clavien-Dindo classification
|
Up to 30 days
|
|
Number of participants with changes in laboratory values 1
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Routine laboratory results were planned to be documented in the hospital including hemoglobin, lymphocytes, total neutrophils, platelet count and white blood cell (WBC) count from blood samples.
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Number of participants with changes in laboratory values 2
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Routine laboratory results were planned to be documented from the general practitioner including hemoglobin, lymphocytes, total neutrophils, platelet count and white blood cell (WBC) count from blood samples.
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
APOE polymorphisms
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
APOE polymorphisms are measured from whole blood once during hospital stay, an expected average of one week.
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Cholinesterases 1
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Acetylcholinesterase and Butyrylcholinesterase are measured from liquor
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Cholinesterases 2
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Acetylcholinesterase and Butyrylcholinesterase are measured from whole blood
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Intracellular pH
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Intracellular pH is measured from whole blood.
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Autophagy of platelets
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Autophagy of platelets is measured from whole blood.
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell are measured from whole blood.
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Multiplex gene expression analyzes (neuroinflammation and micro RNA panels)
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Multiplex gene expression analyzes (neuroinflammation and micro RNA panels) are measured from whole blood
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Autoantibodies
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Autoantibodies against beta2-adrenergic receptor, muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (M3 / M4), serotonin receptor, dopamine receptor are measured from serum
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Trypotophan metabolites and short-chain fatty acids
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Trypotophan metabolites and short-chain fatty acids are measured from serum with metabolomic analysis
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Biomarker panel
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Biomarker are measured from serum by metabolomic analyses to characterize the frailty complex.
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Cytokines
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Cytokines (IFN-Ɣ IL-1β IL-4 IL-6 IL-10 IL-17A IL-17E IL-17F IL-21 IL-23 TGF-β1) are measured from plasma
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Chemokines
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Chemokines (CCL2 (MCP-1) CCL3 CCL4 CCL5 (RAN-TES) CCL11 (Eotaxin) CCL19 CCL20 CXCL1 CXCL8 (IL-8) CXCL10 (IP-10) CXCL12 (SDF1A) are measured from plasma
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Markers immune-brain axis and gut-brain axis
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Markers immune-brain axis and gut-brain axis (zonulin, endothelial cell-specific molecule 1, S100A6, S100A8, S100A9, S100P, S100beta, Interleu-kin-16, CD162, BDNF, CD272, p-selectin, be-ta2microglobulin , Haptoglobin, cathelicidin, NCAM-1, BTLA and CXCR5) are measured from plasma
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Protein panel
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Proteins are measured from plasma by proteome analysis.
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Microbiome 1
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Analyzes of bacteria-specific 16S DNA from different biomaterial.
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Microbiome 2
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Analyzes of sequences of known microorganisms from different biomaterial.
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Serum albumin
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Serum albumin is measured from whole blood
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
HbA1c
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
HbA1c is measured from whole blood
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Vitamin D (cholecalciferol)
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Vitamin D is measured from whole blood
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Dementia markers
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Dementia markers: beta amyloid 1-40, beta-amyloid 1-42, beta-amyloid ratio (42/40 * 10), phospho-TAU, protein 14-3-3, PRPSc, TAU (total tau) are measured from liquor
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Analysis of microbiome
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Microbial diversity is measured from blood, urine and feces (e.g.
Shannon index)
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Analysis of urine
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Relative frequency of metabolites is measured in urine
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Biobanks samples
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Secondary use of the biological samples in particular for research purposes
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome is measured from Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) in orthopedic patients from PG cohort
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome is measured from Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome (KOOS) in orthopedic patients from PG cohort
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Gait analysis 1
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Temporal (e.g.: total activity duration, stance time) parameters are measured in orthopedic patients from PG cohort.
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Gait analysis 2
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Kinetic parameters (e.g.: vertical plantar loading, loading symmetry) are measured in orthopedic patients from PG cohort.
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Range of Motion of the hip/knee
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Range of Motion of the hip/knee is measured during orthopedic investigation of PG cohort patients
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Hip abduction force (for total hip arthroplasty patients)
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Hip abduction force is measured during orthopedic investigation of PG cohort patients
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Knee extension and flexion force measurement (for total knee arthroplasty patients)
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Knee extension and flexion force measurement is measured during orthopedic investigation of PG cohort patients
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Clinical investigation
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Clinical investigation is measured by a neurosurgical method in patients from PG and NFC cohorts who undergo elective spine surgery and in control patients from NO cohort
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Oswestry disability index (ODI)
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
ODI is measured in patients from PG and NFC cohorts who undergo elective spine surgery and in control patients from NO cohort.
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Back pain
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Low Back pain is measured by the Roland Morris Low Back pain and disability questionnaire in patients (PG, NFC, NO cohorts) with lumbal spine problems.
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Leg pain
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Leg pain is measured by 100mm visual analog scale in patients (PG, NFC, NO cohorts) with lumbal spine problems.
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Sciatica Bothersomeness Index
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
To establish values for paresthesia, weakness and leg pain the Sciatica Bothersomeness Index is measured n patients (PG, NFC, NO cohorts) with lumbal spine problems.
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (DASH)
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
To measure Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand the DASH questionnaire is used in patient (PG, NFC, NO cohort) in patients with cervical spine problems
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Modified Japanese orthopaedic association scale
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
The modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale is used to establish criteria for mild, moderate and severe impairment in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy in patients (PG, NFC, NO cohorts) with cervical spine problems
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS)
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
ASIA Impairment Scale is used to measure for patients with spinal myelopathies or spinal cord injuries in patients from PG and NFC cohorts who undergo elective spine surgery and in control patients from NO cohort
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Skill management
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Multiprofessional skill management is evaluated in all participating occupations of the GB cohort in qualitative interviews.
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Acceptance of participatory decision-making
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Acceptance of participatory decision-making before and after participating in an SDM conference.
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Insomnia
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Insomnia is measured by Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), which ranges from 0- 21 points
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Neuroimaging
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Routine neuroimaging results were planned to be documented in the hospital including all techniques to image the nervous system as ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, conventional radiography, computed tomography and positron emission tomography.
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Adherence to Mediterranean diet (MD)
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Adherence to Mediterranean diet (MD) is measured with a German Medi-Score, could range from 0 to 9, with higher scores (6-9) indicating greater MD adherence.
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Psychometric properties of the Meta Memory questionnaire
Time Frame: During the hospital stay, at the beginning of the investigation, an average of two hours.
|
Psychometric properties of the Meta Memory questionnaire are measured twice before surgery.
|
During the hospital stay, at the beginning of the investigation, an average of two hours.
|
|
Total interleukin-8
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Total interleukin-8 is measured from whole blood
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Depth of anesthesia
Time Frame: During surgery, an expected average of 2 hours
|
Depth of anesthesia is measured by brainwaves in different patient states which range from awake, sedated, unresponsive, surgically anesthetized to deeply anesthetized.
|
During surgery, an expected average of 2 hours
|
|
Electroencephalography spectral analysis
Time Frame: During the hospital stay, at the beginning of the investigation, an average of one hour.
|
Electroencephalography spectral analysis is measured by brainwaves preoperatively.
|
During the hospital stay, at the beginning of the investigation, an average of one hour.
|
|
Electroencephalography band power
Time Frame: During the hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
|
Electroencephalography band power is measured postoperatively by an electroencephalography monitor at postoperative day 3 in all patients and in patients with delirium until 48 hours without positive delirium screening
|
During the hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
|
|
Incidence of delirium
Time Frame: During the hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
|
Incidence of delirium, defined according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-V), Richmond Agitation Scale (RASS), Nursing Delirium Screening Scale (Nu-DESC), Confusion Assessment Method (CAM), Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU), along with the delirium severity scores Confusion Assessment Method Severity-Score (CAM-S) in English, Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC), Delirium Rating Scale Revised 98 (DRS-R-98) in English and patient chart review.
The assessment period is from the recovery room up to five postoperative days or until hospital discharge.
|
During the hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
|
|
Severity of delirium
Time Frame: During the hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
|
Severity of delirium defined as a composite score based on: Confusion Assessment Method Severity-Score(CAM-S); Confusion Assessment Method (CAM), Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU), Delirium Rating Scale Revised (DSR-R-98) in English, Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) and Nursing Delirium Screening Scale (Nu-DESC) and patient chart review.
|
During the hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
|
|
Confusion Assessment Method (CAM)
Time Frame: During the hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
|
Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) score is indicative of delirium, if the items 1 and 2 and 3 or the items 1 and 2 and 4 are measured positively.
|
During the hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
|
|
Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU)
Time Frame: During the hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
|
Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) score is indicative of delirium, if the items 1 and 2 and 3 or the items 1 and 2 and 4 are measured positively.
|
During the hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
|
|
Confusion Assessment Method Severity-Score (CAM-S Long Form) in English
Time Frame: During the hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
|
The Confusion Assessment Method Severity-Score (CAM-S Long Form) is an 10-item delirium screening instrument (range: 0-19 points, 19 = most severe).
|
During the hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
|
|
Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC)
Time Frame: During the hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
|
The ICDSC is an 8-item delirium screening instrument (range: 0-8 points).
The score is indicative of delirium, if the item is > 3.
|
During the hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
|
|
Delirium Rating Scale Revised 98 in English (DRS-R-98)
Time Frame: During the hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
|
The delirium rating scale revised 98 is a delirium screening instrument (range 0-46).
The score is indicative of delirium, if the item is > 14.5.
|
During the hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
|
|
Number of Participants with Delirium as Determined by Chart Review
Time Frame: During the hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
|
Delirium is identified chart-based.
|
During the hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
|
|
Effect of analgesics
Time Frame: During the hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
|
Pain is evaluated with the Dolosys Paintracker.
The Paintracker is a handy monitoring device to determine the analgesia needed for patients based on the pain reflex technique.
|
During the hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
|
|
Nursing Delirium Screening Scale (Nu-DESC)
Time Frame: During the hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
|
Nursing Delirium Screening Scale (Nu-DESC) score of ≥ 2 is indicative of delirium, range: 0-10 points, 10 = most severe.
|
During the hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
|
|
Delirium Severity Scale (CAM-ICU-7) in English
Time Frame: During the hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
|
A 7-point rating scale (0-7) was derived from the CAM-ICU and RASS assessments 0-2: no delirium, 3-5: mild to moderate delirium, and 6-7: severe delirium.
|
During the hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
|
|
Incidence of dementia
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
incidence of dementia is measured by MOCA
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Incidence of cognitive impairment
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
incidence of cognitive impairment is measured by a validated score.
|
Up to 1 year
|
|
Nutritional Status
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Changes in the nutritional status after elective surgery
|
Up to 1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Claudia Spies, MD, Prof., Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- ANA-PRAEP-GO
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Frailty Syndrome
-
University of PennsylvaniaCompleted
-
Hospital Universitario GetafeKarolinska Institutet; Medical University of Lodz; Universidad Politecnica de... and other collaboratorsUnknownFrail Elderly Syndrome | Frailty | Frailty SyndromePoland, Spain, Sweden
-
University of AlbertaAlberta Health services; Glenrose FoundationCompletedHealthy | Frail Elderly Syndrome | Frailty | Healthy Aging | Frailty Syndrome | Aging Problems | Aging Disorder | Pre-FrailtyCanada
-
Meridigen Biotech Co., Ltd.Recruiting
-
Wroclaw Medical UniversityCompleted
-
Ageless Regenerative InstituteInstituto de Medicina RegenerativaWithdrawn
-
University of NottinghamMedical Research Council; National Institute for Health Research, United KingdomRecruitingFrail Elderly Syndrome | Frailty | Frailty SyndromeUnited Kingdom
-
Haukeland University HospitalRecruitingFrail Elderly Syndrome | Frailty | Aging | Frailty SyndromeNorway
-
Geriatric Education and Research InstituteSingapore General Hospital; Changi General Hospital; Sengkang General Hospital; Alexandra Hospital and other collaboratorsCompletedFrail Elderly Syndrome | Frailty | Frailty SyndromeSingapore
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalCompletedFrail Elderly Syndrome | Frailty | Aging | Frailty SyndromeUnited States
Clinical Trials on Prehabilitation- new form of care
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyLudwig-Maximilians - University of Munich, The Institute for Medical Information... and other collaboratorsCompletedFrailty | Frail ElderlyGermany
-
University Health Network, TorontoRecruiting
-
Johannes Gutenberg University MainzHochschule für Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft Ludwigshafen Institut für Management... and other collaboratorsRecruiting
-
Linkoeping UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Mayo ClinicCompletedAortic StenosisUnited States
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine,...RecruitingPrehabilitation in Adult Patients Following Selective Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Controlled TrialCardiac Surgery | Prehabilitation | Enhanced RecoveryChina
-
McGill UniversityCanadian Breast Cancer Research AllianceCompleted
-
University of PittsburghCompletedPatient Centered CareUnited States
-
AHS Cancer Control AlbertaCanadian Cancer Society (CCS)Active, not recruitingProstate CancerCanada
-
Fundación Cardioinfantil Instituto de CardiologíaCompleted