- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04899739
Intraoperative Endoscopic Ultrasound for Pancreatic Cancer (EchoSurg)
Prospective Study of Preoperative Diagnostic Endoscopy for the Diagnosis of Occult Metastatic Lesions of Operable Pancreatic Cancer
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Nowadays pancreatic cancer is one of the deadliest oncological pathologies today. Even after curative surgery, considered the only effective curative tool, 5-years survival does not exceed 5%. Before surgery, an endoscopic ultrasound is performed on the patient to carry out the biopsy of the main tumor. However, the evaluation being devoted to the pancreas, this study wishes to extend echoendoscopie to lymph node staging away from the surgical field. The proposed study is based on the hypothesis that the implementation of a simple classification of lymph nodes, based on non-invasive ultrasound criteria, would facilitate the location and qualification of peripancreatic lymph nodes and distant from the tumor, and therefore the staging of the tumor.
At the same time, the video data obtained will be collected in a computer database in order to create an artificial intelligence lesion detection and qualification tool.
This study plans to recruit 45 adult patients, male or female, with a solid or cystic pancreatic tumor and for whom a surgical resection (first line and after neoadjuvant treatment) is planned. The main objective is to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of a simple classification "benign / malignant" of the nodes, established by the endoscopist using endoscopic ultrasound criteria's, compared to the gold standard (anatomopathology).
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Armelle TAKEDA, PhD
- Phone Number: 0390413608
- Email: armelle.takeda@ihu-strasbourg.eu
Study Locations
-
-
-
Strasbourg, France, 67000
- Recruiting
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Endocrinienne
-
Contact:
- Patrick PESSAUX, MD
- Email: patrick.pessaux@chru-strasbourg.fr
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient over 18 years old
- Patient with a solid or degenerated cystic tumor of the pancreas requiring curative surgery
- Patient with a complete clinical examination performed
- Patient with no contraindication to anesthesia, upper digestive endoscopy and pancreatic surgery
- Patient able to receive and understand information relating to the study and give informed written consent
- Patient affiliated to the French social security system
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient presenting with bleeding disease with disorder hemostasis and coagulation (PT <60%, TCA> 40 s and platelets <60,000 / mm3)
- Patient on anticoagulant or antiaggregant treatment that cannot be temporarily interrupted
- Patient carrying a right-left shunt, a severe pulmonary arterial hypertension (high blood pressure pulmonary> 90 mm Hg), uncontrolled systemic hypertension or suffering from respiratory distress syndrome.
- Pregnant or breastfeeding patient
- Patient in exclusion period (determined by a previous study or in progress)
- Patient under legal protection
- Patient under guardianship or trusteeship
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Peripancreatic and distant lymph node assessment
All patients programmed for an endoscopic ultrasound in the context of a pancreatic cancer
|
Peripancreatic lymph nodes and at a distance from the pancreas assessment by endoscopic ultrasound, elastography an doppler to record their anatomical location and characteristics.
All lymph nodes suspected of metastatic disease will be marked with sterile black ink.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Rate of lymph nodes correctly categorised by ultrasound endoscopy. (Sensitivity)
Time Frame: 1 month
|
Number of lymph nodes correctly categorised by ultrasound endoscopy compared to the gold standard (anatomopathology).
|
1 month
|
Rate of lymph nodes wrongly categorised by ultrasound endoscopy. (Specificity)
Time Frame: 1 month
|
Number of lymph nodes wrongly categorised by ultrasound endoscopy compared to the gold standard (anatomopathology).
|
1 month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Rate of metastases actually diagnosed
Time Frame: 1 month
|
Comparison between the number of suspected lymph nodes identified during preoperative endoscopic ultrasound and results of the histological analysis of these resected lymph nodes.
|
1 month
|
Location of hidden lymph node metastases
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Description of the location of hidden lymph node metastases identified by endoscopic ultrasound
|
1 day
|
Number of distant nodes detected during the endoscopic ultrasound
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Number of distant nodes detected during the preoperative endoscopic ultrasound
|
1 day
|
Number of distant malignant lymph nodes
Time Frame: 1 month
|
Number of distant lymph nodes detected during the preoperative endoscopic ultrasound and whose malignancy has been confirmed by the gold standard
|
1 month
|
Rate of patients for whom contraindications for surgery has been detected during the endoscopic ultrasound
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Number of patients for whom a contraindication to surgery has been detected during the endoscopic ultrasound, on the total number of patients included.
|
1 day
|
Rate of patients for whom elastography was required to identify lymph node metastases hidden away from the surgical site
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Number of patients for whom elastography was required to identify distant hidden lymph node metastases
|
1 day
|
Measurement of the operating time required to perform preoperative elastography
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Measurement of the operating time (in minutes) required to perform preoperative elastography.
|
1 day
|
Measurement of the additional costs generated by materials required for preoperative elastography
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Measurement of the additional costs (in euros) generated by materials required for preoperative elastography in resectable pancreas cancer patients
|
1 day
|
Impact of sterile black ink marking of distant nodes during the preoperative EA
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Analysis of the impact of sterile black ink marking of distant lymph nodes during preoperative ultrasound endoscopy on the surgical procedure by the mean of a questionnaire completed by the surgeon.
This questionnaire will be assessed by a score of Likert varying between 1 (not satisfied) and 5 (very satisfied).
|
1 day
|
Development of an algorithm capable of detecting lymph nodes metastases by the mean of artificial intelligence
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Deep learning-based analysis of video data from the ultrasound endoscopy
|
1 day
|
Development of an algorithm capable of characterizing lymph nodes metastases by the mean of artificial intelligence
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Deep learning-based analysis of video data from the ultrasound endoscopy
|
1 day
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Patrick Pessaux, MD, Unité de Chirurgie Hépato-biliaire et Pancréatique, NHC Strasbourg
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013 Jan;63(1):11-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21166. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
- Kleeff J, Reiser C, Hinz U, Bachmann J, Debus J, Jaeger D, Friess H, Buchler MW. Surgery for recurrent pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2007 Apr;245(4):566-72. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000245845.06772.7d.
- Poruk KE, Firpo MA, Adler DG, Mulvihill SJ. Screening for pancreatic cancer: why, how, and who? Ann Surg. 2013 Jan;257(1):17-26. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825ffbfb.
- Butturini G, Stocken DD, Wente MN, Jeekel H, Klinkenbijl JH, Bakkevold KE, Takada T, Amano H, Dervenis C, Bassi C, Buchler MW, Neoptolemos JP; Pancreatic Cancer Meta-Analysis Group. Influence of resection margins and treatment on survival in patients with pancreatic cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Surg. 2008 Jan;143(1):75-83; discussion 83. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2007.17.
- Galasso D, Carnuccio A, Larghi A. Pancreatic cancer: diagnosis and endoscopic staging. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2010 Apr;14(4):375-85.
- Al-Haddad M, Wallace MB, Woodward TA, Gross SA, Hodgens CM, Toton RD, Raimondo M. The safety of fine-needle aspiration guided by endoscopic ultrasound: a prospective study. Endoscopy. 2008 Mar;40(3):204-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-995336. Epub 2007 Dec 4.
- Bhutani MS, Hawes RH, Hoffman BJ. A comparison of the accuracy of echo features during endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of malignant lymph node invasion. Gastrointest Endosc. 1997 Jun;45(6):474-9. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(97)70176-7.
- Kanamori A, Hirooka Y, Itoh A, Hashimoto S, Kawashima H, Hara K, Uchida H, Goto J, Ohmiya N, Niwa Y, Goto H. Usefulness of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography in the differentiation between malignant and benign lymphadenopathy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Jan;101(1):45-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00394.x.
- Giovannini M, Thomas B, Erwan B, Christian P, Fabrice C, Benjamin E, Genevieve M, Paolo A, Pierre D, Robert Y, Walter S, Hanz S, Carl S, Christoph D, Pierre E, Jean-Luc VL, Jacques D, Peter V, Andrian S. Endoscopic ultrasound elastography for evaluation of lymph nodes and pancreatic masses: a multicenter study. World J Gastroenterol. 2009 Apr 7;15(13):1587-93. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.1587.
- Nawaz H, Fan CY, Kloke J, Khalid A, McGrath K, Landsittel D, Papachristou GI. Performance characteristics of endoscopic ultrasound in the staging of pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis. JOP. 2013 Sep 10;14(5):484-97. doi: 10.6092/1590-8577/1512.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 18-007
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pancreatic Cancer
-
Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson...CelgeneWithdrawnPancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma | Stage III Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IV Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IB Pancreatic CancerUnited States
-
University of NebraskaNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedPancreatic Adenocarcinoma | Stage III Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage II Pancreatic Cancer | Stage I Pancreatic Cancer | Resectable Pancreatic Carcinoma | Stage IA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IB Pancreatic CancerUnited States
-
Virginia Commonwealth UniversityNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedPancreatic Adenocarcinoma | Recurrent Pancreatic Carcinoma | Stage III Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IB Pancreatic CancerUnited States
-
Case Comprehensive Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)TerminatedPancreatic Adenocarcinoma | Resectable Pancreatic Cancer | Stage III Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IB Pancreatic Cancer | Poorly Differentiated Malignant Neoplasm | Undifferentiated Pancreatic CarcinomaUnited States
-
Case Comprehensive Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)WithdrawnStage IIA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IB Pancreatic Cancer
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedStage IIA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IB Pancreatic CancerUnited States
-
University of UtahNovartis PharmaceuticalsRecruitingMetastatic Pancreatic Carcinoma | Unresectable Pancreatic Carcinoma | Stage III Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IV Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage II Pancreatic CancerUnited States
-
Shanghai Zhongshan HospitalFudan UniversityNot yet recruitingPancreatic Cancer Stage III | Pancreatic Cancer, Stage IB | Pancreatic Cancer, Stage IIA | Pancreatic Cancer, Stage IIBChina
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonCompletedStage IIA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IB Pancreatic CancerUnited States
-
Fudan UniversityUnknownStage ⅠA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage ⅠB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage ⅡA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage ⅡB Pancreatic CancerChina
Clinical Trials on Echoendoscopy
-
IHU StrasbourgTerminatedRectal Cancer | Rectal AdenocarcinomaFrance
-
Institut BergoniéCompletedHypermetabolic Lymphadenopathy Mediastinum Lower, Posterior and Middle, Detected by PET-CT With 18F-FDG (PET)France