Cancer Predisposition Testing by Family-based Whole-genome Sequencing (WGS) in Every Child With Newly Diagnosed Cancer (PREDICT)

November 2, 2022 updated by: Kathy Tucker, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network

Assessment of the Utility of Family-based (Trio) Whole-genome Sequencing for Cancer Predisposition Testing in Sequential Newly Diagnosed Paediatric and Adolescent Cancer Patients

Assessment of the utility of family-based (trio) whole-genome sequencing for cancer predisposition testing in sequential newly diagnosed paediatric and adolescent cancer patients

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Cancer Predisposition Syndromes (CPS), caused by germline mutations in cancer predisposition genes (CPG) are heritable disorders associated with an increased risk of developing certain types of cancer.

Knowledge of CPG will advance the understanding of tumorigenesis, improve patient care, and facilitate genetic counselling of patients and families. But the prevalence of CPS in Australian children with cancer and the psychosocial impact of germline sequencing to identify CPG have not been studied.

The clinical benefit of family-based WGS in every new child with cancer compared with conventional predictive factors is currently unknown. By testing every child with newly diagnosed cancer the aim is to determine the utility of this approach and its impact on participants and families.

The principal objective of the proposed multicentre prospective study is establish the clinical benefit and utility of family-based WGS to identify underlying CPS in every newly diagnosed child with cancer.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

270

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • New South Wales
      • Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia, 2305
        • Recruiting
        • John Hunter Children's Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Frank Alvaro
      • Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 2031
        • Recruiting
        • Sydney Children's Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Kathy Tucker
      • Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 2145
        • Recruiting
        • The Children's Hospital at Westmead
        • Contact:
          • Luciano Dalla-Pozza

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 21 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Paediatric patients who are being treated for a newly diagnosed cancer in New South Wales, Australia

Description

  • New diagnosis of malignancy
  • Age ≤ 21 years
  • Written informed consent

Psychosocial component:

  • Participants (≥ 12 years)
  • Parent/caregiver(s) of participants
  • Healthcare professionals involved in the care of patients enrolled in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Children and adolescents with newly diagnosed malignancy
  1. Germline whole-genome family-based sequencing and variant identification.
  2. Multidisciplinary Meeting case discussion.
  3. Recommendation of referral to a Cancer Genetics Clinic for further investigation, follow up and/or genetic counselling.
  4. Psychosocial study to analyse the impact of germline sequencing on families.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The proportion of patients with CPS identify by WGS as compared to those correctly identified by clinical information (i.e. family history, tumour type, physical findings).
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The proportion of individuals found to have a reportable germline mutation in a CPG
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
The proportion of patients who have de-novo vs. inherited mutation in CPG.
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Turnaround time for issuing a report to the treating clinician.
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
The proportion of participants with a complete recording of family history of cancer.
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Sensitivity and specificity of WGS versus single/multiple gene panel testing guided by clinical predictive factors.
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
The proportion of participants with CPS who undergo cancer surveillance.
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Test the significance of common cancer risk polymorphisms within a family as a contributing factor in cancer incidence.
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Quantify the frequency of rare noncoding, complex, and oligogenic variation (in units of variants/person, and genes with variants/person), as detected by WGS, in a paediatric cancer population relative to cancer-free parents and population controls.
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Assess the prevalence of subclonal somatic variation (e.g. clonal haematopoiesis of indeterminate potential) in children with non-haematological cancer.
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
The psychological impact of the germline sequencing process, including the informed consent process, on patients and parents.
Time Frame: 5 years
This will be achieved through identifying the incidence of patients and parents enrolled in the study experiencing clinically significant levels of distress, defined as a >7 rating on any of the outcome measures in the Emotion Thermometers Tool©. The incidence of parents and patients experiencing other psychological outcomes such as reduced quality of life will also be identified using the validated scales EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L (parent proxy)/EQ-5D-Y (youth version), Decisional Regret Scale and the Trust In Physician Scale (adapted for a paediatric setting). Psychological outcomes will be re-assessed over the 5 year course of the study to assess impacts of germline sequencing over time.
5 years
Cost of clinical model including WGS for cancer predisposition testing in every child newly diagnosed with cancer.
Time Frame: 5 years
5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 8, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 8, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 15, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 16, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 24, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

May 27, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 4, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 2, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Clinical Trials on Family-based whole genome sequencing

Subscribe