- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04911257
Interbody Systems: Post Market Clinical Follow-up Study
Multi Center, Prospective Evaluation for Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Utilizing Stryker Spine Cervical and Lumbar Interbody Systems: Observational Post Market Clinical Follow up Study
This is a prospective, multi-center study of subjects who will undergo spinal fusion surgery utilizing Stryker Interbody Systems that require post market clinical follow up (PMCF).
The primary study hypothesis for each system is that the mean change in NDI (cervical) or ODI (lumbar) from baseline to Month 12 < -10, that is, the mean improvement exceeds 10 points. In supporting analysis, the same hypotheses will be tested for mean change from baseline to 24 months to demonstrate durability of effectiveness.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Ajay Rastogi, BS
- Phone Number: 201-749-2347
- Email: ajay.rastogi@stryker.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Joerg Kintscher, PhD
- Phone Number: +49 (0) 171 915 3032
- Email: joerg.kintscher@stryker.com
Study Locations
-
-
Louisiana
-
Shreveport, Louisiana, United States, 71101
- Recruiting
- Spine Institute of Louisiana Foundation, Inc.
-
Contact:
- Cody McConnell
- Phone Number: 318-629-6341
- Email: CMcConnell@louisianaspine.org
-
-
Oklahoma
-
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73114
- Recruiting
- The Spine Clinic of Oklahoma City
-
Contact:
- Ashley Mason
- Phone Number: 405-419-5614
- Email: amason@okss.com
-
Principal Investigator:
- Brett Braly, MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Must be planned to undergo spinal fusion surgery utilizing Stryker Interbody Systems for on label indications, which are listed below as inclusion criteria.
Diagnosed with degenerative disc disease (DDD).
Please note for Lumbar devices:
- Can also be diagnosed with up to Grade 1 Spondylolisthesis and/or Degenerative Scoliosis. (Chesapeake is not indicated for degenerative scoliosis)
- Cascadia/Mojave/ Sahara/ Monterey AL can also be diagnosed with up to Grade 1 Retrolisthesis.
Outside of USA, Tritanium is indicated for use in patients with diagnosis of Degenerative Spine Disorders, Spine Revision, Discal and Vertebral Instability; and there is no restriction to Spondylolisthesis Grade.
- Willingness and ability to comply with the requirements of the protocol including follow up requirements.
- Willing and able to sign a study specific informed consent form.
Skeletally mature (age at least 18 years) and:
- Have had six months of lumbar non operative therapy.
- Have had six weeks of cervical non operative treatment.
Will undergo interbody fusion at one or two contiguous levels (Chesapeake Cervical Ti is only indicated for use at one level) at:
- L2 L5 for Cascadia lateral hyperlordotic (>22°l).
- L2 S1 for all other lumbar interbody systems.
- C2 T1 for cervical interbody systems.
- Self reports Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score 30% (raw score of 15/50) for lumbar patients and Neck Disability Index (NDI) score 30% (raw score of 15/50) for cervical patients at pre operative visit.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any condition where the implants interfere with anatomical structures or precludes the benefit of spinal surgery.
- For the Tritanium and Monterey AL systems: Any neuromuscular deficit which places an unsafe load on the device during the healing period.
- For the Cascadia, Chesapeake, Mojave and Sahara systems: Metabolic disorders of calcified tissues.
- Biological factors such as smoking or using nonsteroidal anti inflammatory agents/ anticoagulants.
- Immunosuppressive disorders.
- Grossly distorted anatomy. N/A for Tritanium TL, Tritanium Cervical and Monterey AL
- Inadequate tissue coverage or open wounds.
- Infection at index level(s) at the time of surgery.
- Patients with known sensitivity to materials in the device.
- Has a neuromuscular disorder or mental condition (including general neurological conditions, mental illness, senility, and drug/alcohol abuse) which would create an unacceptable risk of fixation failure or complications in postoperative care or willingness to restrict activities or follow medical advice.
- Obesity.
- Other medical or surgical condition which would preclude the potential benefit of spinal implant surgery, such as the presence of tumors, congenital abnormalities, elevation of sedimentation rate unexplained by other diseases, elevation of white blood cell count (WBC) or marked left shift in the WBC differential count.
For the Tritanium and Monterey AL systems: Any abnormality which affects the normal process of bone remodeling including, but not limited to severe osteoporosis involving the spine, bone absorption, osteopenia, primary or metastatic tumors involving the spine or certain metabolic disorders affecting osteogenesis.
Please note for Tritanium cervical this also includes rapid joint disease, bone absorption, osteopenia, osteomalacia, and/or osteoporosis.
- For the Tritanium, Monterey AL, Chesapeake and Sahara systems: Prior fusion at the level to be treated (as indicated in the IFU).
- Pregnancy, or if the patient intends to become pregnant during the course of the study.
- Incarcerated at the time of study enrollment.
- Current participation in an investigational study that may impact study outcomes.
- Involved in current or pending litigation regarding a spine surgery.
- Receiving worker's compensation.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Degenerate Disc Disease
Subjects who will undergo spinal fusion surgery utilizing Stryker Interbody Systems.
|
This is a prospective, multi-center study of subjects who will undergo spinal fusion surgery utilizing certain Stryker Interbody Systems.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Mean Oswestry Disability Index Change
Time Frame: 12 Months
|
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (lumbar) improvement from baseline to 12 months.
Scale of Oswestry Disability Index from 0-50, 0 meaning no disability.
|
12 Months
|
Mean Neck Disability Index Change
Time Frame: 12 Months
|
Neck Disability Index (NDI) (cervical) improvement from baseline to 12 months.
Scale of Neck Disability Index from 0-50, 0 meaning no disability.
|
12 Months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Mean Oswestry Disability Index Change
Time Frame: 24 Months
|
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (lumbar) change from baseline to 24 months.
Scale of Oswestry Disability Index from 0-50, 0 meaning no disability.
|
24 Months
|
Mean Neck Disability Index Change
Time Frame: 24 months
|
Neck Disability Index (NDI) (cervical) change from baseline to 24 months.
Scale of Neck Disability Index from 0-50, 0 meaning no disability.
|
24 months
|
Safety Events
Time Frame: 24 months
|
The following safety events will be collected through 24 months, including the following: (MedDRA will be used to define these events)
|
24 months
|
Fusion Status
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
|
Fusion will be derived from a logical analysis of three component factors: angular motion, translational motion, and bridging bone.
Each treated level must be considered fused in order for the subject to be considered a radiographic success.
|
3, 6, 12 and 24 months
|
Angular Motion
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
|
Angular Motion will be measured from lateral flexion-extension radiographs.
Angular motion, also known as rotation, is defined as the change in angle between the adjacent endplates of the motion segment.
Angular Motion will be reported in units of degrees
|
3, 6, 12 and 24 months
|
Translational Motion
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
|
Translational Motion will be measured from lateral flexion-extension radiographs Translational motion is defined as the displacement of the posterior-inferior corner of the superior vertebra in a direction defined parallel to the superior endplate of the inferior vertebra.
Translational Motion - Cervical will be reported in units of millimeters and percentage (%) of the anteroposterior (AP) length of the superior endplate of the inferior vertebra.
|
3, 6, 12 and 24 months
|
Bridging Bone
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
|
Interbody Bridging Bone will be graded in accordance with the following definitions:
|
3, 6, 12 and 24 months
|
Disc Height
Time Frame: PreOp, 2 and 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
|
Disc Height will be calculated from neutral lateral radiographs.
Disc Height will be reported in units of millimeters and percentage (%) of the AP length of the superior endplate of the inferior vertebra.
Average Disc Height
|
PreOp, 2 and 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
|
Device Migration
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
|
Migration will be assessed relative to the Week 2 time point or earliest available post-operative visit.
Migration will be measured in millimeters.
|
6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
|
Subsidence
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
|
Subsidence will be assessed relative to the Week 2 time point or earliest available post-operative visit, Subsidence will be measured in millimeters.
|
6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
|
Adjacent Segment Degeneration
Time Frame: 2 and 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
|
Adjacent Segment Degeneration will be assessed at the adjacent levels using the Kellgren-Lawrence Osteoarthritis Grade.
|
2 and 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
|
Device and Supplemental Fixation Breakage
Time Frame: 2 and 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
|
Device and Supplemental Fixation Breakage will be assessed via all available x-ray images
|
2 and 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
|
Visual Analogue Scale Pain Severity
Time Frame: PreOp, 2 and 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
|
A Visual Analogue Scale patient questionnaire will be used to define the pain in the specific regions (cervical or lumbar) in the course of the study.
0 will be defined as "no pain" and 10 the Worst Possible Pain.
|
PreOp, 2 and 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
|
EQ-5D
Time Frame: PreOp, 2 and 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
|
The EQ-5D questionnaire is a standard generic patient questionnaire used to determine the health-related quality of life changes in the course of the study.
|
PreOp, 2 and 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
|
Prolo Scale
Time Frame: PreOp, 2 and 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
|
The Prolo Scale is a 10-point scale consisting of only two questions evaluating the functional and economic status of the patient in the course of this study.
|
PreOp, 2 and 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CAS-017
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Degenerative Disc Disease
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisTerminatedCervical Degenerative Disc Disease | Kyphosis | Lumbar Degenerative Disc DiseaseFrance
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Spine BioPharma, IncMCRARecruitingLumbar Degenerative Disc DiseaseUnited States
-
AxioMed Spine CorporationUnknownDegenerative Disc Disease (DDD)United States, Germany
-
Synthes USA HQ, Inc.CompletedLumbar Degenerative Disc Disease
-
DePuy InternationalTerminatedCervical Degenerative Disc DiseaseAustralia, Germany, Italy, Malaysia, Netherlands, Spain, United Kingdom
-
Synergy Spine SolutionsMCRARecruitingCervical Degenerative Disc DiseaseUnited States
-
Orthofix Inc.TerminatedCervical Degenerative Disc DiseaseUnited States
-
Synergy Spine SolutionsMCRANot yet recruitingCervical Degenerative Disc DiseaseUnited Kingdom
-
ReGelTec, Inc.Not yet recruitingDegenerative Disc Disease (DDD)
Clinical Trials on Cervical or Lumbar Spinal fusion
-
Olympus Biotech CorporationCompleted
-
Rigshospitalet, DenmarkFrederiksberg University HospitalCompleted
-
Bergman ClinicsMICN Lab, University Hospital ZurichCompletedLow Back Pain | Disk Herniated Lumbar | Spinal Stenosis LumbarFrance, Austria, Netherlands
-
Mesoblast, Ltd.CompletedDegenerative Disc Disease | Spinal Stenosis | Degenerative SpondylolisthesisUnited States
-
Induce Biologics USA Inc.Not yet recruitingDegenerative Disc Disease | Spinal Stenosis | Degenerative SpondylolisthesisUnited States
-
Gansu Provincial HospitalActive, not recruiting
-
Mesoblast, Ltd.CompletedSpinal Stenosis | Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease | Degenerative SpondylolisthesisUnited States
-
Justin Parker Neurological InstituteCompletedDegenerative Disc DiseaseUnited States
-
Sitona AGCompletedDegeneration of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc | Degenerative SpondylolisthesisGermany, Switzerland
-
Mesoblast, Ltd.CompletedSpinal Stenosis | Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease | Degenerative SpondylolisthesisAustralia