Interbody Systems: Post Market Clinical Follow-up Study

March 9, 2022 updated by: K2M, Inc.

Multi Center, Prospective Evaluation for Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Utilizing Stryker Spine Cervical and Lumbar Interbody Systems: Observational Post Market Clinical Follow up Study

This is a prospective, multi-center study of subjects who will undergo spinal fusion surgery utilizing Stryker Interbody Systems that require post market clinical follow up (PMCF).

The primary study hypothesis for each system is that the mean change in NDI (cervical) or ODI (lumbar) from baseline to Month 12 < -10, that is, the mean improvement exceeds 10 points. In supporting analysis, the same hypotheses will be tested for mean change from baseline to 24 months to demonstrate durability of effectiveness.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

460

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Louisiana
      • Shreveport, Louisiana, United States, 71101
        • Recruiting
        • Spine Institute of Louisiana Foundation, Inc.
        • Contact:
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73114
        • Recruiting
        • The Spine Clinic of Oklahoma City
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Brett Braly, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study sample will include patients that present with on-label conditions that will be surgically treated by participating investigators.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Must be planned to undergo spinal fusion surgery utilizing Stryker Interbody Systems for on label indications, which are listed below as inclusion criteria.
  2. Diagnosed with degenerative disc disease (DDD).

    Please note for Lumbar devices:

    • Can also be diagnosed with up to Grade 1 Spondylolisthesis and/or Degenerative Scoliosis. (Chesapeake is not indicated for degenerative scoliosis)
    • Cascadia/Mojave/ Sahara/ Monterey AL can also be diagnosed with up to Grade 1 Retrolisthesis.

    Outside of USA, Tritanium is indicated for use in patients with diagnosis of Degenerative Spine Disorders, Spine Revision, Discal and Vertebral Instability; and there is no restriction to Spondylolisthesis Grade.

  3. Willingness and ability to comply with the requirements of the protocol including follow up requirements.
  4. Willing and able to sign a study specific informed consent form.
  5. Skeletally mature (age at least 18 years) and:

    1. Have had six months of lumbar non operative therapy.
    2. Have had six weeks of cervical non operative treatment.
  6. Will undergo interbody fusion at one or two contiguous levels (Chesapeake Cervical Ti is only indicated for use at one level) at:

    1. L2 L5 for Cascadia lateral hyperlordotic (>22°l).
    2. L2 S1 for all other lumbar interbody systems.
    3. C2 T1 for cervical interbody systems.
  7. Self reports Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score 30% (raw score of 15/50) for lumbar patients and Neck Disability Index (NDI) score 30% (raw score of 15/50) for cervical patients at pre operative visit.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any condition where the implants interfere with anatomical structures or precludes the benefit of spinal surgery.
  2. For the Tritanium and Monterey AL systems: Any neuromuscular deficit which places an unsafe load on the device during the healing period.
  3. For the Cascadia, Chesapeake, Mojave and Sahara systems: Metabolic disorders of calcified tissues.
  4. Biological factors such as smoking or using nonsteroidal anti inflammatory agents/ anticoagulants.
  5. Immunosuppressive disorders.
  6. Grossly distorted anatomy. N/A for Tritanium TL, Tritanium Cervical and Monterey AL
  7. Inadequate tissue coverage or open wounds.
  8. Infection at index level(s) at the time of surgery.
  9. Patients with known sensitivity to materials in the device.
  10. Has a neuromuscular disorder or mental condition (including general neurological conditions, mental illness, senility, and drug/alcohol abuse) which would create an unacceptable risk of fixation failure or complications in postoperative care or willingness to restrict activities or follow medical advice.
  11. Obesity.
  12. Other medical or surgical condition which would preclude the potential benefit of spinal implant surgery, such as the presence of tumors, congenital abnormalities, elevation of sedimentation rate unexplained by other diseases, elevation of white blood cell count (WBC) or marked left shift in the WBC differential count.
  13. For the Tritanium and Monterey AL systems: Any abnormality which affects the normal process of bone remodeling including, but not limited to severe osteoporosis involving the spine, bone absorption, osteopenia, primary or metastatic tumors involving the spine or certain metabolic disorders affecting osteogenesis.

    Please note for Tritanium cervical this also includes rapid joint disease, bone absorption, osteopenia, osteomalacia, and/or osteoporosis.

  14. For the Tritanium, Monterey AL, Chesapeake and Sahara systems: Prior fusion at the level to be treated (as indicated in the IFU).
  15. Pregnancy, or if the patient intends to become pregnant during the course of the study.
  16. Incarcerated at the time of study enrollment.
  17. Current participation in an investigational study that may impact study outcomes.
  18. Involved in current or pending litigation regarding a spine surgery.
  19. Receiving worker's compensation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Degenerate Disc Disease
Subjects who will undergo spinal fusion surgery utilizing Stryker Interbody Systems.
This is a prospective, multi-center study of subjects who will undergo spinal fusion surgery utilizing certain Stryker Interbody Systems.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Oswestry Disability Index Change
Time Frame: 12 Months
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (lumbar) improvement from baseline to 12 months. Scale of Oswestry Disability Index from 0-50, 0 meaning no disability.
12 Months
Mean Neck Disability Index Change
Time Frame: 12 Months
Neck Disability Index (NDI) (cervical) improvement from baseline to 12 months. Scale of Neck Disability Index from 0-50, 0 meaning no disability.
12 Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Oswestry Disability Index Change
Time Frame: 24 Months
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (lumbar) change from baseline to 24 months. Scale of Oswestry Disability Index from 0-50, 0 meaning no disability.
24 Months
Mean Neck Disability Index Change
Time Frame: 24 months
Neck Disability Index (NDI) (cervical) change from baseline to 24 months. Scale of Neck Disability Index from 0-50, 0 meaning no disability.
24 months
Safety Events
Time Frame: 24 months

The following safety events will be collected through 24 months, including the following: (MedDRA will be used to define these events)

  • Serious adverse events
  • Device-related adverse events
  • Procedure-related adverse events
  • Operative site adverse events
  • Secondary spine surgeries (secondary interventions)
  • Adverse event that negatively impacts the primary endpoint
24 months
Fusion Status
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Fusion will be derived from a logical analysis of three component factors: angular motion, translational motion, and bridging bone. Each treated level must be considered fused in order for the subject to be considered a radiographic success.
3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Angular Motion
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Angular Motion will be measured from lateral flexion-extension radiographs. Angular motion, also known as rotation, is defined as the change in angle between the adjacent endplates of the motion segment. Angular Motion will be reported in units of degrees
3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Translational Motion
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Translational Motion will be measured from lateral flexion-extension radiographs Translational motion is defined as the displacement of the posterior-inferior corner of the superior vertebra in a direction defined parallel to the superior endplate of the inferior vertebra. Translational Motion - Cervical will be reported in units of millimeters and percentage (%) of the anteroposterior (AP) length of the superior endplate of the inferior vertebra.
3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Bridging Bone
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12 and 24 months

Interbody Bridging Bone will be graded in accordance with the following definitions:

  1. Absent: No evidence of continuous bridging bone from endplate to endplate.
  2. Present: Presence of continuous bridging bone from endplate to endplate.
3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Disc Height
Time Frame: PreOp, 2 and 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Disc Height will be calculated from neutral lateral radiographs. Disc Height will be reported in units of millimeters and percentage (%) of the AP length of the superior endplate of the inferior vertebra. Average Disc Height
PreOp, 2 and 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Device Migration
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Migration will be assessed relative to the Week 2 time point or earliest available post-operative visit. Migration will be measured in millimeters.
6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Subsidence
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Subsidence will be assessed relative to the Week 2 time point or earliest available post-operative visit, Subsidence will be measured in millimeters.
6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Adjacent Segment Degeneration
Time Frame: 2 and 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Adjacent Segment Degeneration will be assessed at the adjacent levels using the Kellgren-Lawrence Osteoarthritis Grade.
2 and 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Device and Supplemental Fixation Breakage
Time Frame: 2 and 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Device and Supplemental Fixation Breakage will be assessed via all available x-ray images
2 and 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Visual Analogue Scale Pain Severity
Time Frame: PreOp, 2 and 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
A Visual Analogue Scale patient questionnaire will be used to define the pain in the specific regions (cervical or lumbar) in the course of the study. 0 will be defined as "no pain" and 10 the Worst Possible Pain.
PreOp, 2 and 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
EQ-5D
Time Frame: PreOp, 2 and 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
The EQ-5D questionnaire is a standard generic patient questionnaire used to determine the health-related quality of life changes in the course of the study.
PreOp, 2 and 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Prolo Scale
Time Frame: PreOp, 2 and 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
The Prolo Scale is a 10-point scale consisting of only two questions evaluating the functional and economic status of the patient in the course of this study.
PreOp, 2 and 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 7, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 7, 2026

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 17, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 3, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 24, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Degenerative Disc Disease

Clinical Trials on Cervical or Lumbar Spinal fusion

3
Subscribe