An Efficacy Study of Secukinumab In Enthesitis of Psoriatic Arthritis Patients

July 19, 2021 updated by: Peking Union Medical College Hospital

An Efficacy Study of Secukinumab in Enthesitis of Psoriatic Arthritis Patients as Measured by Imaging Test

Given the role of IL-17 in the development of entheseal-driven pathology, a therapeutic strategy aimed at blocking IL-17 would be a logical option for the treatment of enthesitis in psoriatic arthritis patients. This study will be the first randomized trial of a biologic therapy in participants with psoriatic arthritis, using imaging test.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Xiaomei Leng, Dr.
  • Phone Number: +8613681057089
  • Email: lpumch@126.com

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100730
        • Recruiting
        • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • aged 18 years or older,;
  • had received a diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis at least 6 months previously, fulfilled the Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR);
  • had at least 1 active enthesitis (confirmed by ultrasound) ;
  • had active arthritis (at least 3 tender/painful and 3 swollen joints) ;
  • had active plaque psoriasis (there was no criteria for minimum psoriasis severity) at screening and baseline.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of surgery or trauma at the site examined by ultrasound (hand, elbow, knee, ankle, etc.);
  • Local injection of glucocorticoids or other drugs at the site examined by ultrasound in recent 6 weeks;
  • Peripheral neuropathy;
  • Use of IL-17 or IL-12/23 inhibitors in the last 12 months;Use of infliximab, adamumab, golimumab, and cetuzumab in the last 10 weeks;PUVA treatment for the last 4 weeks;Use of topical treatment or UVB phototherapy that may have an effect on psoriasis in the last 2 weeks;
  • recent history of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, hepatic, hematological, gastrointestinal, metabolic, endocrine, pulmonary, cardiovascular, or neurologic disease; evidence of active or latent or inadequately treated Mycobacterium tuberculosis; aspartate transaminase (AST) or alanine transaminase (ALT) >3x upper limit of normal (ULN) at screening; estimated creatinine clearance <40 mL/min.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Secukinumab 300mg
Randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to secukinumab 300mg or secukinumab 150mg or MTX 15mg qw
Secukinumab 150 mg s.c. with loading dose at baseline, week 1,2,3,4 and then every 4 weeks from week 5 up to 12 weeks. After which, if MASEI ultrasound enthesitis score improvement is less than 50%, Secukinumab 150 mg will be with a switch to 300 mg.
EXPERIMENTAL: Secukinumab 150mg
Randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to secukinumab 300mg or secukinumab 150mg or MTX 15mg qw
Methotrexate 15 mg po. every week up to 12 weeks. After which, if MASEI ultrasound enthesitis score improvement is less than 50%, methotrexate with a switch to Secukinumab 150 mg at 12 weeks.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: methotrexate
methotrexate

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in the Madrid Sonographic Enthesis Index (MASEI) ultrasound enthesitis score
Time Frame: Baseline,Week 12 and Week 24
Twelve entheses will be scored in terms of inflammatory and morphological components according to the OMERACT enthesitis composite semi-quantitative scale (0 to 3). The lowest OMERACT score a participant can have at baseline is 1 (based on Inclusion Criterion, which requires at least 1 points in the B-mode or the Doppler mode in at least one active enthesis ). The highest OMERACT score expected at baseline will be 136, assuming that each of the 12 entheses assessed shows a maximum of 3 points in the gray scale score, and a maximum of 3 points in the Doppler score.
Baseline,Week 12 and Week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in the OMERACT Heel Enthesitis MRI Scoring System(HEMRIS)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24
Heel Entheses will be scored in terms of inflammatory and morphological components according to the RAMRIS and PsAMRIS composite semi-quantitative scale (0 to 3). The lowest HEMRIS score a participant can have at baseline is 0. The highest HEMRIS score expected at baseline will be 6, assuming that the heel entheses assessed shows a maximum of 3 points in inflammatory score, and a maximum of 3 points in structure damage.
Baseline and Week 24
Change from Baseline in the PsASon13 unilateral ultrasound composite score of synovitis
Time Frame: Baseline,Week 12 and Week 24
Joints examined by the PsASon13 unilateral ultrasound composite score: Small finger joints: MCP2, MCP5, H-PIP1, H-PIP2, H-PIP3; Distal interphalangeal finger joints: H-DIP3; Small joints of feet: MTP1, MTP5, F-PIP1; Distal interphalangeal joints of feet: F-DIP2, F-DIP3; Large joints: wrist and knee. Lowest score a participant may have at baseline is 0. Highest score a participant may have at baseline is 184 (5 small finger joints, each ranging from 0 to 18; 1 distal interphalangeal finger joint, each ranging from 0 to 16; 3 small joints of feet, each ranging from 0 to 12; 2 distal interphalangeal joints of feet, each ranging from 0 to 12; 1 wrist ranging from 0 to 12; and 1 knee ranging from 0 to 6). Largest change expected from baseline to Week 16 is -118 points (improvement).
Baseline,Week 12 and Week 24
Proportion of patients achieving ACR20、ACR50 and ACR70 response.
Time Frame: Baseline,Week 12 and Week 24
The ACR is a standard criteria originally developed to measure the effectiveness of various arthritis medications or treatments in clinical trials for RA, but is also widely used in PsA. The ACR measures improvement in tender joint count (TJC) or swollen joint count (SJC), and improvement in at least 3 of the following 5 parameters: Patient Global Assessment (PtGA), Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGA), physical function (using HAQ-DI) and acute phase reactant (using CRP). ACR 20 response is achieved if ≥ 20%≥ 50%/≥ 70% improvement in tender joint count (TJC) or swollen joint count (SJC) as well as a ≥ 20%/≥ 50%/≥ 70% improvement in ≥ 3 of the other 5 parameters.
Baseline,Week 12 and Week 24
Number of participants who achieve Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI 75)
Time Frame: Baseline,Week 12 and Week 24
Scores range from 0 to 72. A score of more than 10 generally translates to "moderate-to-severe". Usually, the higher your PASI score, the lower the quality of life. A PASI 75 is at least a 90% improvement (reduction) in PASI score.
Baseline,Week 12 and Week 24
Change from Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24
A 10-item measure to assess health-related quality of life in adults with skin diseases. Scores range from 0-30 with a higher score being less quality of life.
Baseline and Week 24
Change from Baseline in HAQ-DI score
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) is a 20-question scale assessing functional ability. The final HAQ-DI score ranges from 0 (no problems functioning) to 3 (not able to function).
Baseline and Week 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

July 15, 2021

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

October 31, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 8, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 19, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

July 20, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

July 20, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 19, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Psoriatic Arthritis

Clinical Trials on Methotrexate

Subscribe