An Episodic Future Thinking Intervention to Promote Weight Loss in Breast Cancer Survivors

February 5, 2025 updated by: Sagar Sardesai, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center

Episodic Future Thinking: An Interventional Pilot Study to Promote Weight Loss in Breast Cancer Survivors

This clinical trial evaluates the use of an Episodic Future thinking Intervention to promote weight loss in breast cancer survivors. Obesity is associated with multiple negative health sequelae in breast cancer survivors. This includes an increased risk of cancer recurrence and mortality, multiple quality of life issues, and increased risk of co-morbidities.

Delay Discounting is a behavioral health economic target that refers to the "discounting" of a larger benefit in the future for a smaller, more immediate reward in the present. A high delay discounting rate is correlated with poor dietary choices and sedentary lifestyle. Episodic Future Thinking (EFT) simulates positive events that may occur in one's future, engaging the science of prospection. EFT decreases delay discounting rate, resulting in healthier diet choices and weight reduction. However, valuation of the future may impact cancer survivors differently due to adjusted mortality perception and cancer-related stress.

This study will determine the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of remotely delivered (smartphone application) EFT as a behavioral intervention for weight loss in breast cancer survivors. Implementation of EFT as a complementary approach to standard lifestyle interventions could lead to improvement in weight loss, food choice, and quality of life, thereby positively impacting overall health and longevity in cancer survivors.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. To evaluate the feasibility of the 12-week remotely delivered episodic future thinking (EFT) intervention.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To evaluate the impact of EFT compared to control (episodic recent thinking [ERT]) on weight loss and delay discounting (DD) in overweight and obese breast cancer survivors at 12 and 24 weeks.

II. To evaluate the baseline and 12 week change in:

IIa. Patient reported outcomes (PROs) measured by standard instruments: Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scales 29 Profile version (v)2.1 (domains: physical function, social roles, fatigue, depression, anxiety, pain, sleep disturbance) and Global Health Short Form (general physical and mental health).

IIb. Insulin resistance (Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance [HOMA-IR]) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).

IIc. Diet quality, measured by Health Eating Index (HEI)-2015 on Vioscreen food frequency questionnaire (FFQ).

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

ARM I: Patients participate in EFT over 12 weeks, in which they will receive prompts via a guided smartphone application to engage in EFT in their daily lives. Patients are asked to recall future positive experiences to create text cues which vividly describes these experiences.

ARM II: Patients participate in Episodic Recent Thinking (ERT; control arm) over 12 weeks, in which they will receive prompts via a guided smartphone application to engage in control thinking in their daily lives. Patients are asked to recall past positive experiences to create text cues which vividly describes these experiences.

After completion of study intervention, patients are followed up for an additional12 weeks.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >= 18 years
  • Breast cancer (BC) survivors (pathologically proven ductal carcinoma in situ or stage I-III invasive BC and completed primary breast surgery, radiation, chemotherapy >= 21 days prior to enrollment)
  • Body mass index (BMI) >= 25 kg/m^2
  • Endocrine and HER2- directed therapy is permitted
  • Have access to a mobile electronic device
  • Motivated to lose weight (readiness to change assessment)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Stage IV BC
  • Have not completed definitive locoregional therapy (surgery +/- radiation therapy)
  • Participating in another weight loss clinical trial
  • Not able to speak and understand English
  • Cognitive impairment which would interfere with performance of DD task or EFT procedures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm I (EFT)
Patients participate in EFT over 12 weeks, in which they will receive prompts via a guided smartphone application to engage in EFT in their daily lives. Patients are asked to recall future positive experiences to create text cues which vividly describes these experiences.
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
  • Quality of Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Participate in EFT
Other Names:
  • Behavior Conditioning Therapy
  • Behavior Modification
  • Behavior or Life Style Modifications
  • Behavior Therapy
  • Behavioral Interventions
  • Behavioral Modification
  • Behavioral Therapy
  • Behavioral Treatment
  • Behavioral Treatments
Participate in ERT
Other Names:
  • Behavior Conditioning Therapy
  • Behavior Modification
  • Behavior or Life Style Modifications
  • Behavior Therapy
  • Behavioral Interventions
  • Behavioral Modification
  • Behavioral Therapy
  • Behavioral Treatment
  • Behavioral Treatments
Active Comparator: Arm II (ERT)
Patients participate in ERT over 12 weeks, in which they will receive prompts via a guided smartphone application to engage in ERT in their daily lives. Patients are asked to recall past positive experiences to create text cues which vividly describes these experiences.
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
  • Quality of Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Participate in EFT
Other Names:
  • Behavior Conditioning Therapy
  • Behavior Modification
  • Behavior or Life Style Modifications
  • Behavior Therapy
  • Behavioral Interventions
  • Behavioral Modification
  • Behavioral Therapy
  • Behavioral Treatment
  • Behavioral Treatments
Participate in ERT
Other Names:
  • Behavior Conditioning Therapy
  • Behavior Modification
  • Behavior or Life Style Modifications
  • Behavior Therapy
  • Behavioral Interventions
  • Behavioral Modification
  • Behavioral Therapy
  • Behavioral Treatment
  • Behavioral Treatments

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility measured by Adherence
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
A one-sample t-test will be used to evaluate adherence (average proportion of smartphone prompts participants open and attended to during the 12-week trial recorded by the web application)
Up to 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in total body weight
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
Evaluated using a linear mixed effects model. The model will include baseline measure, timepoint (12 and 24 weeks), treatment assignment, and the timepoint by treatment interaction as fixed effects. A subject-level random effect will be included to account for the correlation of multiple measurements of the same individual.
Up to 12 weeks
Change in total body weight
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
Evaluated using a linear mixed effects model. The model will include baseline measure, timepoint (12 and 24 weeks), treatment assignment, and the timepoint by treatment interaction as fixed effects. A subject-level random effect will be included to account for the correlation of multiple measurements of the same individual.
Up to 24 weeks
Change in delay discounting rate
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Evaluated using a linear mixed effects model. The model will include baseline measure, timepoint (12 weeks), treatment assignment, and the timepoint by treatment interaction as fixed effects. A subject-level random effect will be included to account for the correlation of multiple measurements of the same individual.
Baseline to 12 weeks
Change in delay discounting rate
Time Frame: Baseline to 24 weeks
Evaluated using a linear mixed effects model. The model will include baseline measure, timepoint (24 weeks), treatment assignment, and the timepoint by treatment interaction as fixed effects. A subject-level random effect will be included to account for the correlation of multiple measurements of the same individual.
Baseline to 24 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in patient reported outcome (PRO)
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
PRO measured by standard instruments: PROMIS® scales 29 Profile v2.1 (domains: physical function, social roles, fatigue, depression, anxiety, pain, sleep disturbance) and Global Health Short Form (general physical and mental health)
Baseline to 12 weeks
Change in Insulin Resistance
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Insulin Resistance will be measured by Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)
Baseline to 12 weeks
Change in quantity of serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Inflammatory Biomarker
Baseline to 12 weeks
Change in diet quality
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Measured by Health Eating Index 2015.
Baseline to 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sagar D Sardesai, MBBS MPH, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 3, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

November 3, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 13, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 11, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 19, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 5, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anatomic Stage I Breast Cancer AJCC v8

Clinical Trials on Quality-of-Life Assessment

Subscribe