The Together Webinar Programme For Military Partners (TTP-Webinar)

August 18, 2021 updated by: Prof. Dominic Murphy, Combat Stress

Supporting the Mental Health Needs of Military Partners Through The Together Webinar Programme: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Military partners are at risk of mental health difficulties, including depression, anxiety and secondary traumatization. However, many partners face a range of barriers in accessing psychological support. As such, there remains a need to investigate how to make support for military partners more accessible.

The present study was a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) investigating the effectiveness of The Together Webinar Programme (TTP-Webinar) in reducing psychological distress and secondary trauma symptoms and improving quality of life among partners of veterans with PTSD and other mental health difficulties. The pilot RCT compared the TTP-Webinar intervention to a waitlist condition. The primary aim was to assess the acceptability and feasibility of offering web-based support to military partners and to investigate the efficacy of the remote-access support.

It was hypothesized that, compared to the waitlist condition, the TTP-Webinar would result in significant reductions in psychological distress and secondary symptoms, and improvements in overall quality of life.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Evidence has found that living alongside a veteran suffering from mental health difficulties can have an adverse outcome on relationships and the health of family members. Military partners, in particular, have been highlighted as a high-risk group for developing mental health difficulties due to their close relationship with the veteran, exposure to adverse details of the veteran's military experiences and, in some cases, need to take on a caregiving role. Investigation of the impact on military partners suggests that they are an increased risk of depression, anxiety, alcohol use difficulties, as well as symptoms of secondary traumatization.

Despite an interest and need for mental health support among military partners, many face a range of barriers that prevent accessing and engaging in support. Such barriers include stigma around help seeking behaviors, difficulties in travelling to support venues, and work or childcare responsibilities that may limit their availability to engage with support. As such, there remains a need to make mental health support for military partners more accessible.

The Together Webinar Programme (TTP-Webinar) is a six-week online intervention developed to increase the accessibility of mental health support for military partners. TTP-Webinar was adapted from a five-week community-based TTP programme that was piloted across nine UK locations. Despite the community-based TTP programme demonstrating promising effects on mental health difficulties among military partners, the pilot revealed that many partners were unable to engage with support because of issues traveling to and from community centres around balancing other commitments.

The present study was a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed at investigating the utility of TTP-Webinar as an online intervention to increase the accessibility of support. 60 partners of veterans with PTSD and other mental health difficulties were randomised to either the TTP-Webinar intervention (n = 30) or waitlist condition (n = 30). Measures of general psychological distress, secondary trauma symptoms and quality of life were administered at baseline, end of treatment, and one-month follow-up.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

196

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United Kingdom
    • Surrey
      • Leatherhead, Surrey, United Kingdom, KT22 0BX
        • Combat Stress

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be over the age of 18
  • Live in the UK
  • Currently be in relationship with a veteran
  • Provide written consent

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: The Together Webinar Programme (TTP-Webinar)
Participants receive the six weekly session TTP-Webinar intervention.
Behavioral: The Together Webinar Programme

The TTP-Webinar consists of six hour-long sessions. Each session focuses on psychoeducation and self-management strategies for supporting veteran mental health difficulties as well as self-management tools to enhance partners' own wellbeing.

The TTP-Webinar treatment protocol incorporates a range of techniques used in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), Dialectical Behavioral Therapy (DBT), Compassion Focused Therapy (CFT), and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT).

Other Names:
  • TTP-Webinar
No Intervention: Waitlist condition
Participants do not receive any intervention as part of waitlist condition. Note: Following the collection of measures at the follow-up time point, participants assigned to the waitlist condition were offered four TTP-Webinar groups to sign up to.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in symptoms of the psychological distress on the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) from baseline to end of treatment to 1-month follow-up
Time Frame: Baseline, end of treatment (6 weeks), and one-month follow-up.
The GHQ-12 (Goldberg & Williams, 1988) is 12-item measure of symptoms of general psychological distress. Items are scoring using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 ('Not at all'/'Much less than usual') to 4 ('Much more than usual'/'More so than usual'), indicating how much they have been bothered by symptoms within the past month. Six positive items are reverse scored, before calculating a total score with larger scores indicating greater psychological distress.
Baseline, end of treatment (6 weeks), and one-month follow-up.
Change in symptoms of secondary traumatization on the Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale (STSS) from baseline to end of treatment to 1-month follow-up
Time Frame: Baseline, end of treatment (6 weeks), and one-month follow-up.
The STSS (Bride et al., 2004) is a 17-item measure assessing symptoms of secondary traumatization. Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 ('Never') to 5 ('Very often'), indicating how much they have been bothered by symptoms within the past month. Total scores are created per subscales (avoidance, arousal, and intrusions) and across all subscales, with larger scores indicating greater secondary trauma symptoms.
Baseline, end of treatment (6 weeks), and one-month follow-up.
Change in Quality of life (QoL) from baseline to end of treatment to 1-month follow-up.
Time Frame: Baseline, end of treatment (6 weeks), and one-month follow-up.
QoL was assessed with a single item, using a scale ranging from 1 ('Very good') to 5 ('Very bad'). Scores were reverse scored, for larger scores to reflect greater quality of life.
Baseline, end of treatment (6 weeks), and one-month follow-up.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Combat Stress

Collaborators

Royal British Legion

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dominic Murphy, Combat Stress

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 7, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 26, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

September 26, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 29, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 18, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 19, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 19, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 18, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • EGR17Q4\100016

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Psychological Distress

Clinical Trials on The Together Webinar Programme

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Venezuela

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe