Risk Model for Severe Rebound Pain After Lower Limb Orthopedic Surgery Involving Single-Shot Sciatic Nerve Blocks

October 31, 2022 updated by: Cynthia Yarnold, University of British Columbia

Development and Internal Validation of a Multivariable Risk Prediction Model for Severe Rebound Pain After Lower Limb Orthopedic Surgery Involving Single-Shot Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Blocks: A Single Centre Retrospective Cohort Study

Rebound pain is a well-recognized phenomenon after the effects of a nerve block wear off. Severe rebound pain can happen after outpatient surgery, with patients often needing to come back to the hospital or use other health care resources.

People who are younger, female or have more pain before surgery are at higher risk of having rebound pain. Bone surgeries and upper limb surgeries also increase the chances of having rebound pain after surgery. Patients who have a tourniquet used during leg surgery often have worse pain after surgery compared to patients who get surgery without the use of a tourniquet.

Things that may reduce the chances of getting rebound pain are the use of nerve block catheters, certain additives in nerve blocks and using multiple types of pain killers before the block wears off. Using nerve block catheters can be expensive, so a targeted approach of giving these catheters to patients who have the highest chances of getting rebound pain may be the best way to allocate resources and help patients.

The aim of this study is to create and test a risk model for severe rebound pain after lower limb surgery where patients are getting a sciatic nerve block.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Rebound pain is a well-recognized phenomenon after the resolution of peripheral nerve blocks. Severe rebound pain is prevalent after ambulatory surgery, with potential resultant increased health-care utilization and cost. Risk factors for severe rebound pain may include younger age, female sex, high preoperative pain score, bone surgeries, and upper limb surgeries. Use of tourniquet for lower limb procedures is also associated with worse postoperative pain compared to without. Protective factors may include continuous perineural catheter, regional anesthesia adjuncts, and multimodal oral pain management prior to resolution of peripheral nerve blockade. However, placement of continuous peripheral nerve block catheters utilizes additional health care resources; hence, a targeted approach where continuous perineural catheters are offered to patients at the highest risk of severe rebound pain could potentially offer the biggest benefit.

The aim of the study is to derive and validate a multivariable prediction model for severe rebound pain after lower limb surgery involving popliteal blockade, to assist with risk stratification and shared decision making.

The primary model endpoint is severe rebound pain, defined by transition from well-controlled pain (numerical rating scale [NRS] 3 or less or patient report of satisfactory pain control) in the post anesthetic care unit (PACU) while the block is working to severe pain (NRS pain score 7 or greater) within 48 h of block performance. This definition is modified from that of Barry et al., 2020 as clinically, the investigators have noted some patients having sensory blocks lasting more than 24 hours with the use of adjuncts.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

1270

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6Z 1Y6
        • St. Paul's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients who received a single-shot popliteal sciatic nerve block at St. Paul's Hospital in the study period.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who underwent lower limb surgery and received a single-shot popliteal sciatic nerve block pre-operatively at St. Paul's Hospital from January 4, 2016 to November 1, 2019

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who had uncontrolled pain (defined as NRS greater than 3 and/or nursing note documentation of uncontrolled or severe pain and/or undocumented pain status) in the post anesthesia care unit (post-operatively)
  • Patients who received a popliteal sciatic nerve catheter

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Lower Limb Orthopedic Surgery Patients who Received Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Blocks
All patients undergoing lower limb surgery who received popliteal sciatic nerve blocks (with or without other peripheral nerve blocks) at St. Paul's Hospital from January 4, 2016 to November 1, 2019
This study utilizes data from the St. Paul's Hospital Peripheral Nerve Block Database.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve
Time Frame: Not a time dependent outcome (retrospective participant pain data up to 48 hours after a nerve block was administered)
The Area under the ROC Curve provides a graphical display of sensitivity and specificity and is used to evaluate the discriminative ability of the risk prediction model.
Not a time dependent outcome (retrospective participant pain data up to 48 hours after a nerve block was administered)
Calibration Slope
Time Frame: Not a time dependent outcome (model validation test based on retrospective participant pain data up to 48 hours after a nerve block was administered)
To evaluate the the degree to which numerical predictions are too high or too low compared to outcomes.
Not a time dependent outcome (model validation test based on retrospective participant pain data up to 48 hours after a nerve block was administered)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Scaled Brier Score
Time Frame: Not a time dependent outcome (model evaluation/validation test based on retrospective participant pain data up to 48 hours after a nerve block was administered)
A proper score function that measures the accuracy of probabilistic predictions.
Not a time dependent outcome (model evaluation/validation test based on retrospective participant pain data up to 48 hours after a nerve block was administered)
Nagelkerke R2
Time Frame: Not a time dependent outcome (model evaluation/validation test based on retrospective participant pain data up to 48 hours after a nerve block was administered)
An adjusted version of the Cox & Snell R-square that adjusts the scale of the statistic to cover the full range from 0 to 1.
Not a time dependent outcome (model evaluation/validation test based on retrospective participant pain data up to 48 hours after a nerve block was administered)
Decile Calibration Plots
Time Frame: Not a time dependent outcome (model evaluation/validation test based on retrospective participant pain data up to 48 hours after a nerve block was administered)
Decile Calibration Plots will be generated for the final prediction models to further assess calibration, with Loess-smoothed calibration curves created for each imputed dataset.
Not a time dependent outcome (model evaluation/validation test based on retrospective participant pain data up to 48 hours after a nerve block was administered)
Decision Curve Analysis
Time Frame: Not a time dependent outcome (model evaluation/validation test based on retrospective participant pain data up to 48 hours after a nerve block was administered)
The Decision Curve Analysis is a method to evaluate prediction models and diagnostic tests. It will be performed on the final prediction models.
Not a time dependent outcome (model evaluation/validation test based on retrospective participant pain data up to 48 hours after a nerve block was administered)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Cynthia Yarnold, MD, University of British Columbia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 4, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 26, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

July 26, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 10, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 24, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 1, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 31, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on This is not an interventional study

Subscribe