Evaluating the Impact of Incentives on Clinical Trial Participation

March 18, 2021 updated by: University of California, Riverside

Evaluating the Impact of Incentives on HIV Related Clinical Trial Participation

The objective of this study is to investigate the impact of incentives on clinical trial participation. 1) characterize key stakeholders' views on and assessment of incentives, 2) reach consensus among stakeholders on the factors to be considered when choosing incentives and their relative importance, 3) pilot test using vignettes for incentive decision making. We hypothesize that potential study participants make trade-offs regarding the characteristics of a research study when deciding whether to volunteer. This amendment is to document IRB reliance between UCR and USF.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

360

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Riverside, California, United States, 92521
        • Recruiting
        • UC Riverside
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Brandon Brown, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Andrea Polonijo, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

We will recruit patient partners, biomedical HIV researchers and IRB members/bioethicists involved in HIV research and patient partners with HIV co-morbidities (depression, heart disease, arthritis). For the patient populations, we will target men (including MSM) and women aging with HIV, cis and transgender women, and youth (age 18+) of color, but participation will be open to everyone over 18 years of age living with HIV who speaks English and live in the United States.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • people living with HIV
  • biomedical HIV researchers
  • IRB members/bioethicists involved in HIV research

Exclusion Criteria:

  • people under 18 years of age
  • people living outside of the United States
  • people who do not speak English

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
characterize how people living with HIV assess incentives
Time Frame: 3 months
we will conduct a 20 question quantitative survey of a nationally representative sample of people living with HIV asking about specific study payment information and scenarios
3 months
characterize key stakeholders' views on and assessment of incentives
Time Frame: 3 months
focus groups, and key informant interviews will be used to characterize key stakeholders' (people aging with HIV, IRB members, researchers) views on and assessment of incentives, with qualitative analysis of text done using RaDAR. We will use Conjoint Analysis (CJA) to estimate the relative importance (also called "weight") that participants place on each study characteristic when choosing between different hypothetical studies.
3 months
pilot testing vignettes for incentive decision making
Time Frame: 3 months
We will develop HIV related vignettes (hypothetical scenarios) utilizing the data from outcomes 1 and 2. Specifically, once we have 6 to 8 study characteristics from Aim 2, and the final number of choices (2 - 3) per characteristic, we will use a factorial design to create 25 vignettes (hypothetical scenarios). Individuals from each group (i.e., study participants, researchers, and IRB members) will select the most appropriate incentive from a list of possibilities based on various scenarios. These vignettes will be based on studies identified in the literature and a review of consent forms and created in conjunction with the external advisory board (including pre-testing and revision prior to finalization).
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 2, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

March 22, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 22, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 59270

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aging

Clinical Trials on This is not an interventional study

3
Subscribe